Walton's types of argumentation dialogues as classroom discourse sequences
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Albe, 2008, When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect: Students’ argumentation in group discussions on a socio-scientific issue, Research in Science Education, 38, 67, 10.1007/s11165-007-9040-2
Alexander, 2008
Andriessen, 2014, Arguing to learn, 439
Asterhan, 2009, Argumentation and explanation in conceptual change: Indications from protocol analyses of peer-to-peer dialog, Cognitive Science, 33, 374, 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01017.x
Asterhan, 2016, Argumentation for learning: Well-trodden paths and unexplored territories, Educational Psychologist, 51, 164, 10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458
Baker, 2003, Computer-mediated argumentative interactions for the co-elaboration of scientific notions, 47
Baker, 2009, Argumentative interactions and the social construction of knowledge, 127
Berland, 2009, Making sense of argumentation and explanation, Science Education, 93, 26, 10.1002/sce.20286
Braun, 2006, Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chinn, 1998, The structure of discussions that promote reasoning, Teachers College Record, 100, 315, 10.1177/016146819810000205
Christodoulou, 2014, The science classroom as a site of epistemic talk: A case study of a teacher’s attempts to teach science based on argument, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51, 1275, 10.1002/tea.21166
Dawson, 2010, Teaching strategies for developing students’ argumentation skills about socioscientific issues in high school genetics, Research in Science Education, 40, 133, 10.1007/s11165-008-9104-y
Driver, 2000, Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in science classrooms, Science Education, 84, 287, 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
Duschl, 2002, Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education, Studies in Science Education, 38, 39, 10.1080/03057260208560187
Erduran, 2004, Tapping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse, Science Education, 88, 915, 10.1002/sce.20012
Felton, 2019, Capturing collaborative argument: An analytic scheme for coding deliberative dialogue, Learning, Culture, & Social Interaction
Felton, 2009, Deliberation versus dispute: The impact of argumentative discourse goals on learning and reasoning in the science classroom, Informal Logic, 29, 417, 10.22329/il.v29i4.2907
Felton, 2015, Arguing collaboratively: Argumentative discourse types and their potential for knowledge building, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 372, 10.1111/bjep.12078
Felton, 2001, The development of argumentive discourse skill, Discourse Processes, 32, 135, 10.1207/S15326950DP3202&3_03
Ford, 2008, Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning, Science Education, 92, 404, 10.1002/sce.20263
Garcia-Mila, 2008, Cognitive foundations of learning argumentation, 29
Gomez Zaccarelli, 2018, Learning from professional development: A case study of the challenges of enacting productive science discourse in the classroom, Professional Development in Education, 1
Gregory, 2007, A framework for facilitating classroom dialogue, Teaching Philosophy, 30, 59, 10.5840/teachphil200730141
Hennessy, 2016, Developing a coding scheme for analysing classroom dialogue across educational contexts, Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 9, 16, 10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.12.001
Koslowski, 2008, Information becomes evidence when an explanation can incorporate it into a causal framework, Cognitive Development, 23, 472, 10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.09.007
Kuhn, 1993, Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking, Science Education, 77, 319, 10.1002/sce.3730770306
Kuhn, 2005
Kuhn, 2013, Developing norms of argumentation: Metacognitive, epistemological, and social dimensions of developing argumentive competence, Cognition and Instruction, 31, 456, 10.1080/07370008.2013.830618
Lemke, 1990
Levinson, 1992, Activity types and language, 66
Lyle, 2008, Dialogic teaching: Discussing theoretical contexts and reviewing evidence from classroom practice, Language and Education, 22, 222, 10.1080/09500780802152499
Macagno, 2017, Analyzing the pragmatic structure of dialogues, Discourse Studies, 19, 148, 10.1177/1461445617691702
McBurney, 2001, Chance discovery using dialectical argumentation, 2253, 414
McNeill, 2013, Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of scientific argumentation: The impact of professional development on K–12 teachers, Science Education, 97, 936, 10.1002/sce.21081
McNeill, 2012
McNeill, 2010, Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation, Science Education, 94, 203, 10.1002/sce.20364
Mercer, 1996, The quality of talk in children’s collaborative activity in the classroom, Learning and Instruction, 6, 359, 10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00021-7
Mercer, 1999, Children's talk and the development of reasoning XE "reasoning" in the classroom, British Educational Research Journal, 25, 95, 10.1080/0141192990250107
Nussbaum, 2005, The effects of goal instructions and text on the generation of counterarguments during writing, Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 157, 10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.157
Peirce, 1878, How to make our ideas clear, Vol.1
Pimentel, 2013, Conducting talk in secondary science classrooms: Investigating instructional moves and teachers’ beliefs, Science Education, 97, 367, 10.1002/sce.21061
Rajala, 2016, Dealing with the contradiction of agency and control during dialogic teaching, Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 10, 17, 10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.02.005
Rapanta, 2018, Potentially argumentative teaching strategies and how to empower them, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 52, 451
Rapanta, 2018, Teaching as abductive reasoning. The role of argumentation, Informal Logic, 38, 293, 10.22329/il.v38i2.4849
Rapanta, 2013, What is meant by argumentative competence? An integrative review of methods of analysis and assessment in education, Review of Educational Research, 83, 483, 10.3102/0034654313487606
Reznitskaya, 2017
Sampson, 2012, Science teachers and scientific argumentation: Trends in views and practice, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 1122, 10.1002/tea.21037
Sandoval, 2005, The quality of students’ use of evidence in written scientific explanations, Cognition and Instruction, 23, 23, 10.1207/s1532690xci2301_2
Schegloff, 2007, Sequence organization in interaction, Vol. 1
Scott, 2006, The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons, Science Education, 90, 605, 10.1002/sce.20131
Sinclair, 1975
Von Aufschaiter, 2008, Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies on how students’ argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 101, 10.1002/tea.20213
Walton, 1998
Walton, 1995
Walton, 2008
Walton, 2010, Types of dialogue and burdens of proof, 13
Wilkinson, 2017, Toward a more dialogic pedagogy: Changing teachers’ beliefs and practices through professional development in language arts classrooms, Language and Education, 31, 65, 10.1080/09500782.2016.1230129
Zeidler, 2014, Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis. Theory, research, and practice, 711