Walton's types of argumentation dialogues as classroom discourse sequences

Learning, Culture and Social Interaction - Tập 36 - Trang 100352 - 2022
Chrysi Rapanta1, Andri Christodoulou2
1Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal
2University of Southampton, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Albe, 2008, When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect: Students’ argumentation in group discussions on a socio-scientific issue, Research in Science Education, 38, 67, 10.1007/s11165-007-9040-2

Alexander, 2008

Andriessen, 2014, Arguing to learn, 439

Asterhan, 2009, Argumentation and explanation in conceptual change: Indications from protocol analyses of peer-to-peer dialog, Cognitive Science, 33, 374, 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01017.x

Asterhan, 2016, Argumentation for learning: Well-trodden paths and unexplored territories, Educational Psychologist, 51, 164, 10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458

Baker, 2003, Computer-mediated argumentative interactions for the co-elaboration of scientific notions, 47

Baker, 2009, Argumentative interactions and the social construction of knowledge, 127

Berland, 2009, Making sense of argumentation and explanation, Science Education, 93, 26, 10.1002/sce.20286

Blair, 1987, Argumentation as dialectical, Argumentation, 1, 41, 10.1007/BF00127118

Braun, 2006, Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Chinn, 1998, The structure of discussions that promote reasoning, Teachers College Record, 100, 315, 10.1177/016146819810000205

Christodoulou, 2014, The science classroom as a site of epistemic talk: A case study of a teacher’s attempts to teach science based on argument, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51, 1275, 10.1002/tea.21166

Coffin, 2009, Argument reconceived?, Educational Review, 61, 301, 10.1080/00131910903045948

Dawson, 2010, Teaching strategies for developing students’ argumentation skills about socioscientific issues in high school genetics, Research in Science Education, 40, 133, 10.1007/s11165-008-9104-y

Driver, 2000, Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in science classrooms, Science Education, 84, 287, 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A

Duschl, 2002, Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education, Studies in Science Education, 38, 39, 10.1080/03057260208560187

Erduran, 2004, Tapping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse, Science Education, 88, 915, 10.1002/sce.20012

Felton, 2019, Capturing collaborative argument: An analytic scheme for coding deliberative dialogue, Learning, Culture, & Social Interaction

Felton, 2009, Deliberation versus dispute: The impact of argumentative discourse goals on learning and reasoning in the science classroom, Informal Logic, 29, 417, 10.22329/il.v29i4.2907

Felton, 2015, Arguing collaboratively: Argumentative discourse types and their potential for knowledge building, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 372, 10.1111/bjep.12078

Felton, 2001, The development of argumentive discourse skill, Discourse Processes, 32, 135, 10.1207/S15326950DP3202&3_03

Ford, 2008, Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning, Science Education, 92, 404, 10.1002/sce.20263

Garcia-Mila, 2008, Cognitive foundations of learning argumentation, 29

Gomez Zaccarelli, 2018, Learning from professional development: A case study of the challenges of enacting productive science discourse in the classroom, Professional Development in Education, 1

Gregory, 2007, A framework for facilitating classroom dialogue, Teaching Philosophy, 30, 59, 10.5840/teachphil200730141

Hennessy, 2016, Developing a coding scheme for analysing classroom dialogue across educational contexts, Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 9, 16, 10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.12.001

Koslowski, 2008, Information becomes evidence when an explanation can incorporate it into a causal framework, Cognitive Development, 23, 472, 10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.09.007

Kuhn, 1993, Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking, Science Education, 77, 319, 10.1002/sce.3730770306

Kuhn, 2005

Kuhn, 2013, Developing norms of argumentation: Metacognitive, epistemological, and social dimensions of developing argumentive competence, Cognition and Instruction, 31, 456, 10.1080/07370008.2013.830618

Lemke, 1990

Levinson, 1992, Activity types and language, 66

Lyle, 2008, Dialogic teaching: Discussing theoretical contexts and reviewing evidence from classroom practice, Language and Education, 22, 222, 10.1080/09500780802152499

Macagno, 2017, Analyzing the pragmatic structure of dialogues, Discourse Studies, 19, 148, 10.1177/1461445617691702

McBurney, 2001, Chance discovery using dialectical argumentation, 2253, 414

McNeill, 2013, Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of scientific argumentation: The impact of professional development on K–12 teachers, Science Education, 97, 936, 10.1002/sce.21081

McNeill, 2012

McNeill, 2010, Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation, Science Education, 94, 203, 10.1002/sce.20364

Mercer, 1996, The quality of talk in children’s collaborative activity in the classroom, Learning and Instruction, 6, 359, 10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00021-7

Mercer, 1999, Children's talk and the development of reasoning XE "reasoning" in the classroom, British Educational Research Journal, 25, 95, 10.1080/0141192990250107

Nussbaum, 2005, The effects of goal instructions and text on the generation of counterarguments during writing, Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 157, 10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.157

Peirce, 1878, How to make our ideas clear, Vol.1

Pimentel, 2013, Conducting talk in secondary science classrooms: Investigating instructional moves and teachers’ beliefs, Science Education, 97, 367, 10.1002/sce.21061

Rajala, 2016, Dealing with the contradiction of agency and control during dialogic teaching, Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 10, 17, 10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.02.005

Rapanta, 2018, Potentially argumentative teaching strategies and how to empower them, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 52, 451

Rapanta, 2018, Teaching as abductive reasoning. The role of argumentation, Informal Logic, 38, 293, 10.22329/il.v38i2.4849

Rapanta, 2013, What is meant by argumentative competence? An integrative review of methods of analysis and assessment in education, Review of Educational Research, 83, 483, 10.3102/0034654313487606

Reznitskaya, 2017

Sampson, 2012, Science teachers and scientific argumentation: Trends in views and practice, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 1122, 10.1002/tea.21037

Sandoval, 2005, The quality of students’ use of evidence in written scientific explanations, Cognition and Instruction, 23, 23, 10.1207/s1532690xci2301_2

Schegloff, 2007, Sequence organization in interaction, Vol. 1

Scott, 2006, The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons, Science Education, 90, 605, 10.1002/sce.20131

Sinclair, 1975

Von Aufschaiter, 2008, Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies on how students’ argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 101, 10.1002/tea.20213

Walton, 1998

Walton, 1995

Walton, 2008

Walton, 2010, Types of dialogue and burdens of proof, 13

Wilkinson, 2017, Toward a more dialogic pedagogy: Changing teachers’ beliefs and practices through professional development in language arts classrooms, Language and Education, 31, 65, 10.1080/09500782.2016.1230129

Zeidler, 2014, Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis. Theory, research, and practice, 711