Voting for direct democratic participation: evidence from an initiative election

Althaus, S. L. (1996). Opinion polls, information effects and political equality: Exploring ideological biases in collective opinion. Political Communication, 13, 3–21.

Altonji, J. G., Elder, T. E., & Taber, C. R. (2005). Selection on observed and unobserved variables: Assessing the effectiveness of catholic schools. Journal of Political Economy, 113(1), 151–184.

Altonji, J. G., Elder, T. E., & Taber, C. R. (2008). Using selection on observed variables to assess bias from unobservables when evaluating swan-ganz catheterization. American Economic Review, 98(2), 345–50.

Arnold, F., & Freier, R. (2015). Signature requirements and citizen initiatives: Quasi-experimental evidence from Germany. Public Choice, 162, 43–56.

Asatryan, Z., Baskaran, T., & Heinemann, F. (2014). The effect of direct democracy on the level and structure of local taxes. ZEW Discussion Papers, Number 14-003.

Asatryan, Z., Baskaran, T., Grigoriadis, T., & Heinemann, F. (2016). Direct democracy and local public finances under cooperative federalism. Scandinavian Journal of Economics. doi: 10.1111/sjoe.12169 .

Bayerischer Landtag (1991). Plenarprotokoll 12/9. 12. Wahlperiode, 9. Sitzung, 21.02.1991, Muenchen.

Bayerischer Landtag (1994a). Gesetzentwurf Sechstes Gesetz zur Aenderung der Verfassung des Freistaates Bayern. Drucksache 13/208, 13. Wahlperiode, Gesetzentwurf SPD und BUENDNIS 90 DIE GRUENEN, Schmidt et al., 15.12.1994, Muenchen.

Bayerischer Landtag (1995a). Gesetzentwurf zur Einfuehrung von Buergerantrag, Buergerbegehren und Buergerentscheid in Gemeinden und Landkreisen. Drucksache 13/1333, 13. Wahlperiode, Gesetzentwurf CSU, Glueck et al., 26.04.1995, Muenchen.

Bayerischer Landtag (1994b). Gesetzentwurf zur Aenderung der Gemeindeordnung und der Landkreisordnung. Drucksache 13/209, 13. Wahlperiode, Gesetzentwurf SPD und BUENDNIS 90 DIE GRUENEN, Schmidt et al., 15.12.1994, Muenchen.

Bayerischer Landtag (1995b). Plenarprotokoll 13/16. 13. Wahlperiode, 16. Sitzung, 27.04.1995, Muenchen.

Bayerischer Landtag (1995c). Plenarprotokoll 13/23. 13. Wahlperiode, 23. Sitzung, 04.07.1995, Muenchen.

Bayerischer Landtag (1995d). Plenarprotokoll 13/8. 13. Wahlperiode, 8. Sitzung, 24.01.1995, Muenchen.

Benz, M., & Stutzer, A. (2004). Are voters better informed when they have a larger say in politics? Evidence for the European Union and Switzerland? Public Choice, 119, 31–59.

Bierl, P. (1995). Die Schadensgrenze fest im Auge. Sueddeutsche Zeitung—Landkreis Fuerstenfeldbruck 19.09.1995, 2.

Bohnet, I., & Frey, B. S. (1994). Direct-democratic rules: The role of discussion. Kyklos, 47, 341–54.

Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Karp, J. A. (2007). Enraged or engaged? Preferences for direct citizen participation in affluent democracies. Political Research Quaterly, 60, 351–362.

Bowler, S., & Donovan, T. (1994). Information and opinion change on ballot propositions. Political Behavior, 16(4), 411–435.

Brunner, E., Ross, S. L., & Washington, E. (2013). Does less income mean less representation? American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 5(2), 53–76.

Carey, J. M., & Hix, S. (2013). District magnitude and representation of the majority’s preferences: A comment and reinterpretation. Public Choice, 154(1–2), 139–148.

Collingwood, L. (2012). Levels of education and support for direct democracy. American Politics Research, 40(4), 571–602.

Craig, S. C., Kreppel, A., & Kane, J. G. (2001). Public opinion and support for direct democracy: A grassroots perspective. In M. Mendelsohn & A. Perkin (Eds.), Referendum democracy: Citizens, elites and deliberation in referendum campaigns (pp. 25–46). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

CSU Parteitag (1982). Wir in Bayern CSU 82’ Kraftvoll in die Zukunft: Programm zur Landtagswahl ’82. Abteilung Oeffentlichkeitsarbeit der CSU-Landesleitung.

Cummings, R. G., Elliott, S., & Harrison, G. W. (1997). Are hypothetical referenda incentive compatible? Journal of Politcal Economy, 105(3), 609–621.

Dalton, R. J., Bürklin, W., & Drummond, A. (2001). Public opinion and direct democracy. Journal of Democracy, 12(4), 141–153.

Diamond, P., Hausman, J. A., Leonard, G. K., & Denning, M. A. (1993). Does contingent valuation measure preferences? Experimental evidence. In J. A. Hausman (Ed.), Contingent valuation. A critical assessment (pp. 41–89). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.

Diamond, P. A., & Hausman, J. A. (1994). Contingent valuation: Is some number better than no number? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4), 45–64.

Donovan, T., & Karp, J. A. (2006). Popular support for direct democracy. Party Politics, 12(5), 671–688.

Dyck, J. J., & Baldassare, M. (2009). Process preferences and voting in direct democratic elections. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(3), 551–565.

Eichenberger, R., & Serna, A. (1996). Random errors, dirty information, and politics. Public Choice, 86, 137–156.

Feld, L. P., & Kirchgaessner, G. (2000). Direct democracy, political culture, and the outcome of economic policy: A report on the swiss experience. European Journal of Political Economy, 16, 287–306.

Feld, L. P., & Matsusaka, J. G. (2003). Budget referendums and government spending: Evidence from Swiss cantons. Journal of Public Economics, 87(12), 2703–2724.

Frey, B. S. (1994). Direct democracy: Polito-economic lessons from Swiss experience. The American Economic Review, 84(2), 338–342.

Funk, P. (2016). How accurate are surveyed preferences for public policies? Evidence from a unique institutional setup. Review of Economics and Statistics (forthcoming).

Garrett, T. A. (1999). A test of shirking under legislative and citizen vote: The case of state lottery adoption. The Journal of Law and Economics, 42(1), 189–208.

Gerber, E. R. (1999). The populist paradox: Interest group influence and the promise of direct legislation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Hanemann, W. M. (1994). Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. The Journal of Political Perspectives, 8(4), 19–43.

Hersch, P. L., & McDougall, G. S. (1988). Voting for ‘Sin’ in Kansas. Public Choice, 57, 127–139.

Hessami, Z. (2014). Electoral rules for mayors and incentives to pork-barrel: Quasi-experimental evidence from german municipalities. Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association, Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy.

Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Inglehart, R. (1999). Postmodernization brings declining respect for authority but rising support for democracy. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jenssen, A. T., & Listhaug, O. (2001). Voters’ decisions in the Nordic EU referendums of 1994: The importance of party cues. In M. Mendelsohn & A. Perkin (Eds.), Referendum democracy: Citizens, elites and deliberation in referendum campaigns (pp. 169–190). New York: Palgrave.

Kahneman, D., & Knetsch, J. L. (1992). Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22(1), 57–70.

Kauder, B., & Potrafke, N. (2016). Supermajorities and political rent extraction. Kyklos, 69(1), 65–81.

Leininger, A. (2015). Popular support for direct democracy in europe. Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions 2015, What citizens want from democracy: Popular Attitudes to Existing Political Processes and their Alternatives, Warsaw.

List, J. A. (2002). Preference reversals of a different kind: The “more is less” phenomenon. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1636–1643.

Lupia, A. (1994). Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. The American Political Science Review, 88(1), 63–67.

Matsusaka, J. G. (2005). Direct democracy works. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(2), 185–206.

Matsusaka, J. G. (2008). For the many or the few: The initiative, public policy, and American democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Matsusaka, J. G. (2010). Popular control of public policy: A quantitative approach. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 5(2), 133–167.

Murphy, J. J., Allen, P. G., Stevens, T. H., & Weatherhead, D. (2005). A meta-analysis of hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 30(3), 313–325.

Nalebuff, B. J., & Shachar, R. (1999). Follow the leader: Theory and evidence on political participation. American Economic Review, 89(3), 525–547.

Neill, H. R., Cummings, R. G., Ganderton, P. T., Harrison, G. W., & McGuckin, T. (1994). Hypothetical surveys and real economic commitments. Land Economics, 70(2), 145.

Noam, E. M. (1980). The efficiency of direct democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 88(4), 803–810.

Osborne, M., & Turner, M. (2010). Cost benefit analyses versus referenda. Journal of Political Economy, 118(1), 156–187.

Oster, E. (2014). Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: Theory and evidence. University of Chicago Booth School of Business Working Paper.

Pappi, F. U. (2011). CSU- und CDU-Waehlerschaften im Sozialstrukturellen Vergleich. Hanns-Seidel-Stiftung Akademie fuer Politik und Zeitgeschehen.

Piott, S. L. (2003). Giving voters a voice: The origins of the initiative and referendum in America. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.

Portmann, M. (2014). Parliamentary representation of citizens’ preferences: Explaining the differences between parliamentarians’ votes and popular referendum results (1. Aufl ed.). Neue Studien zur politischen Ökonomie. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

Portmann, M., Stadelmann, D., & Eichenberger, R. (2012). District magnitude and representation of the majority’s preferences: Evidence from popular and parliamentary votes. Public Choice, 151(3–4), 585–610.

Schlaepfer, F., Roschewitz, A., & Hanley, N. (2004). Validation of stated preferences for public goods: A comparison of contingent valuation survey response and voting behaviour. Ecological Economics, 51(1–2), 1–16.

Schlaepfer, F., & Hanley, N. (2006). Contingent valuation and collective choice. Kyklos, 59(1), 115–135.

Schneider, F., Pommerehne, W. W., & Frey, B. S. (1981). Politico-economic interdependence in a direct democracy: The case of Switzerland. In D. A. Hibbs, H. Fassbender, & R. D. Rivers (Eds.), Contemporary political economy: Studies on the interdependence of politics and economics, number 135 in contributions to economic analysis (pp. 231–248). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

Smith, D. A., & Tolbert, C. J. (2001). The initiative to party partisanship and ballot initiatives in California. Party Politics, 7(6), 739–757.

Stadelmann, D., Portmann, M., & Eichenberger, R. (2013). Quantifying parliamentary representation of constituents’ preferences with quasi-experimental data. Journal of Comparative Economics, 41(1), 170–180.

Stadelmann, D., & Torgler, B. (2013). Bounded rationality and voting decisions over 160 years: Voter behavior and increasing complexity in decision-making. PLoS One, 8(12), e84078.

Trechsel, A. H., & Sciarini, P. (1998). Direct democracy in Switzerland: Do elites matter? European Journal of Political Research, 33(1), 99–124.

Zaller, J., & Feldman, S. (1992). A simple theory of the survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 579.