Vocal plasticity in a reptile

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences - Tập 284 Số 1855 - Trang 20170451 - 2017
Henrik Brumm1, Sue Anne Zollinger2
1Henrik Brumm http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6915-9357 [email protected] Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed
2Sue Anne Zollinger http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8819-2606 Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed

Tóm tắt

Sophisticated vocal communication systems of birds and mammals, including human speech, are characterized by a high degree of plasticity in which signals are individually adjusted in response to changes in the environment. Here, we present, to our knowledge, the first evidence for vocal plasticity in a reptile. Like birds and mammals, tokay geckos ( Gekko gecko ) increased the duration of brief call notes in the presence of broadcast noise compared to quiet conditions, a behaviour that facilitates signal detection by receivers. By contrast, they did not adjust the amplitudes of their call syllables in noise (the Lombard effect), which is in line with the hypothesis that the Lombard effect has evolved independently in birds and mammals. However, the geckos used a different strategy to increase signal-to-noise ratios: instead of increasing the amplitude of a given call type when exposed to noise, the subjects produced more high-amplitude syllable types from their repertoire. Our findings demonstrate that reptile vocalizations are much more flexible than previously thought, including elaborate vocal plasticity that is also important for the complex signalling systems of birds and mammals. We suggest that signal detection constraints are one of the major forces driving the evolution of animal communication systems across different taxa.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01056.x

Wiley RH, 2013, Animal communication and noise, 7, 10.1007/978-3-642-41494-7_2

Kimbrough DO, 2008, Evolution of communicative flexibility: complexity, creativity, and adaptability in human and animal communication

10.1098/rstb.2011.0215

10.1007/s00265-013-1565-y

10.1098/rspb.1999.0824

10.1126/science.289.5483.1355

10.1126/science.1108841

10.1073/pnas.0706741104

10.1038/nature06390

10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.003

10.1163/000579511X605759

10.1111/brv.12026

10.1073/pnas.1030017100

10.1007/s00359-012-0789-z

10.1038/srep18556

10.1093/beheco/arv204

10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.05.031

Colafrancesco KC, 2016, Vertebrate sound production and acoustic communication, 51, 10.1007/978-3-319-27721-9_3

10.1080/09524622.1991.9753155

10.1080/03949370.2011.566581

10.1643/0045-8511(2001)001[0248:ACATRT]2.0.CO;2

10.1006/anbe.1999.1416

10.1073/pnas.50.5.806

10.1121/1.3458813

10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.04.026

10.18637/jss.v067.i01

10.1016/S0167-6393(96)00041-6

10.1242/jeb.00768

10.1002/ajp.20317

Brumm H, 2013, Animal communication and noise, 187, 10.1007/978-3-642-41494-7_7

10.1098/rspb.2012.2798

Schwartz JJ, 2013, Animal communication and noise, 91, 10.1007/978-3-642-41494-7_5

10.1098/rsbl.2012.0676

10.3758/BF03328608

10.1006/anbe.1998.0746

10.1098/rsbl.2010.0451

Gerhardt H, 2002, Acoustic communication in insects and anurans

10.1093/beheco/11.2.169

10.1242/jeb.119552

10.1016/j.resp.2010.01.004

10.1017/S1464793106007111

10.1111/j.1439-0310.1981.tb01923.x

10.1007/s00265-009-0795-5

10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.035

10.1098/rspb.2006.0263

10.1007/978-3-642-41494-7

10.4159/9780674287044