Viscous damping formulation and high frequency motion propagation in non-linear site response analysis

Schnabel, 1972

Sugito, 1994, Frequency dependent equi-linearized technique for seismic response analysis of multi-layered ground, Doboku Gakkai Rombun-Hokokushu/Proc Japan Soc Civil Engng, 493, 49

Assimaki, 2000, Model for dynamic shear modulus and damping for granular soils, J Geotech Geoenviron Engng, 126, 859, 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:10(859)

Masing G. Eignespannungen und Verfestigung beim Messing. Second International Congress on Applied Mechanics, Zurich, Switzerland; 1926.

Pyke, 1979, Nonlinear soil models for irregular cyclic loadings, J Geotech Engng Div, 105, 715, 10.1061/AJGEB6.0000820

Vucetic, 1990, Normalized behavior of clay under irregular cyclic loading, Can Geotech J, 27, 29, 10.1139/t90-004

Lee MK, Finn WDL. DESRA-2, Dynamic effective stress response analysis of soil deposits with energy transmitting boundary including assessment of liquefaction potential. Soil mechanics series no. 36, Vancouver, Canada: Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia; 1978.

Matasovic N. Seismic response of composite horizontally-layered soil deposits. PhD Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles; 1993. p. xxix, 452 leaves.

Matasovic N, Vucetic M. Seismic response of soil deposits composed of fully-saturated clay and sand layers. First International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Tokyo, Japan; 1995.

Borja, 1999, Nonlinear ground response at Lotung LSST site, J Geotech Geoenviron Engng, 125, 187, 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:3(187)

Hashash, 2001, Non-linear one-dimensional seismic ground motion propagation in the Mississippi embayment, Engng Geol, 62, 185, 10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00061-8

Idriss IM. Personal communications; 2000.

Newmark, 1959, A method of computation for structural dynamics, J Engng Mech Div, 85, 67, 10.1061/JMCEA3.0000098

Rayleigh, 1945

Kramer, 1996

Clough, 1993

Chopra, 1995

Hudson M, Idriss IM, Beikae M. University of California Davis, Center for Geotechnical Modeling, and National Science Foundation (US). quad4m: a computer program to evaluate the seismic response of soil structures using finite element procedures and incorporating a compliant base. Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of California Davis: Davis California; 1994.

Laird JP, Stokoe KH. Dynamic properties of remolded and undisturbed soil samples test at high confining pressure. Electric Power Research Institute; 1993.

Boore DM. smsim Fortran programs for simulating ground motions from earthquakes: Version 1.87. Users' manual, US Geological Survey; 2000. p. 73.

Seed RB, Dickenson SE, Riemer MF, Bray JD, Sitar N, Mitchell JK, Idriss IM, Kayen RE, Kropp A, Harder LF, Power MS. Preliminary report on the principal geotechnical aspects of the October 17, 1989. Loma Prieta Earthquake; 1990.

Finn, 1993, Analysis of ground motions at Treasure Island site during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, Soil Dynamics Earthquake Engng, 12, 383, 10.1016/0267-7261(93)90001-8

Gibbs, 1992, Seismic velocities and geologic logs from borehole measurements at seven strong-motion stations that recorded the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, USGS: Menlo Park, 139

Pass DG. Soil characterization of the deep accelerometer site at Treasure Island, San Francisco, California. MS Thesis in Civil Engineering, University of New Hampshire; 1994.

Hwang SK, Stokoe KH. Dynamic properties of undisturbed soil samples from Treasure Island, California. Geotechnical Engineering Center, Civil Engineering Department, University of Texas at Austin; 1993.