Verbal Fluency in Parkinson’s Patients with and without Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus: A Meta-analysis

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society - Tập 22 Số 4 - Trang 478-485 - 2016
Kathryn A. Wyman‐Chick1
1Pacific University, Hillsboro, Oregon

Tóm tắt

Abstract

Objectives: Patients with Parkinson’s disease often experience significant decline in verbal fluency over time; however, deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) is also associated with post-surgical declines in verbal fluency. The purpose of this study was to determine if Parkinson’s patients who have undergone bilateral STN-DBS have greater impairment in verbal fluency compared to Parkinson’s patients treated by medication only. Methods: A literature search yielded over 140 articles and 10 articles met inclusion criteria. A total of 439 patients with Parkinson’s disease who underwent bilateral STN-DBS and 392 non-surgical patients were included. Cohen’s d, a measure of effect size, was calculated using a random effects model to compare post-treatment verbal fluency in patients with Parkinson’s disease who underwent STN-DBS versus those in the non-surgical comparison group. Results: The random effects model demonstrated a medium effect size for letter fluency (d=−0.47) and a small effect size for category fluency (d=−0.31), indicating individuals with bilateral STN-DBS had significantly worse verbal fluency performance than the non-surgical comparison group. Conclusions: Individuals with Parkinson’s disease who have undergone bilateral STN-DBS experience greater deficits in letter and category verbal fluency compared to a non-surgical group. (JINS, 2016, 22, 478–485)

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Lipsey, 2000, Practical meta-analysis

10.1016/S0303-8467(99)00044-X

10.1001/archneurol.2010.260

10.1093/brain/awt151

10.1001/jama.2008.929

10.1080/01621459.1987.10478551

10.1080/13854040802360582

10.1016/j.parkreldis.2011.01.011

10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.068

10.1002/mds.20962

10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70308-8

10.1371/journal.pone.0079247

Lezak, 2012, Neuropsychological assessment

10.1080/02687030244000077

10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03759.x

10.2307/1164923

Bronnick, 2005, Cognitive impairment and dementia in Parkinson’s disease, 27

10.1017/S1355617704104141

1992, Combining information: Statistical issues and opportunities for research

10.1016/j.jns.2008.06.010

10.1002/mds.22603

Cohen, 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences

10.1136/jnnp.2005.086660

10.1212/01.wnl.0000234881.77830.66

10.1212/WNL.0000000000000943

10.1002/ana.21596

10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.07.036

Fields, 2015, Neuropsychology and cognitive neurology of Parkinson’s disease and other movement disorders, 333

10.1212/01.wnl.0000313835.33830.80

10.1017/S1355617707070105

10.1093/brain/111.2.299

10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70475-6

10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70114-5

10.1080/13854046.2010.521770

10.1017/S1355617711001925

10.1016/j.parkreldis.2009.08.010

10.1016/S0887-6177(03)00004-0

10.1016/j.parkreldis.2006.11.011