Veränderungspotenziale durch die Digitalisierung der gewerkübergreifenden Kooperation von kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen im Baugewerbe in Richtung Building Information Modeling (BIM) – Eine Fallanalyse
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aagesen, G., & Krogstie, J. (2015). BPMN 2.0 for modeling business processes. In J. vom Brocke & M. Rosemann (Hrsg.), Handbook on business process management (Bd. 1, S. 219–250). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45100-3_10.
Antoni, C. H., & Ellwart, T. (2017). Informationsüberlastung bei digitaler Zusammenarbeit – Ursachen, Folgen und Interventionsmöglichkeiten. Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO), 48(4), 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-017-0392-4.
Argote, L., Turner, M. E., & Fichman, M. (1989). To centralize or not to centralize: The effects of uncertainty and threat on group structure and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(89)90058-7.
Babič, N. Č., & Rebolj, D. (2016). Culture change in construction industry: from 2D toward BIM based construction. Journal of Information Technology in Construction (itcon), 21(6), 86–99.
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: state of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115.
Barile, S., Franco, G., Nota, G., & Saviano, M. (2012). Structure and dynamics of a “T-shaped” knowledge. From individuals to cooperating communities of practice. Service Science, 4(2), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.1120.0014.
Baxter, G., & Sommerville, I. (2011). Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering. Interacting with Computers, 23(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.07.003.
Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., & Van Lente, H. (2006). The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technology analysis & strategic management, 18(3–4), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320600777002.
Bosch-Sijtsema, P. M., Fruchter, R., Vartiainen, M., & Ruohomäki, V. (2011). A framework to analyze knowledge work in distributed teams. Group & Organization Management, 36, 275–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601111403625.
Brandstädter, S., Schleiting, Y., & Sonntag, K. (2018). Interdisziplinäre Kompetenz in der Wirtschaft. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft, 72(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41449-017-0080-9.
Breuer, C., Hüffmeier, J., Hibben, F., & Hertel, G. (2020). Trust in teams: a taxonomy of perceived trustworthiness factors and risk-taking behaviors in face-to-face and virtual teams. Human Relations, 73(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718818721.
Bryde, D., Broquetas, M., & Volm, J. M. (2013). The project benefits of building information modelling (BIM). International journal of project management, 31, 971–980.
Bråthen, K., & Moum, A. (2016). Bridging the gap: bringing BIM to construction workers. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 23(6), 751–764. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2016-0008.
Carter, K. M., Mead, B. A., Stewart, G. L., Nielsen, J. D., & Solimeo, S. L. (2018). Reviewing work team design characteristics across industries: combining metaanalysis and comprehensive synthesis. Small Group Research, 50, 138–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496418797431/257090.
Chan, A. P., Ma, X., Yi, W., Zhou, X., & Xiong, F. (2018). Critical review of studies on building information modeling (BIM) in project management. Frontiers engineering management, 5(3), 394–406. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FEM-2018203.
Chen, K., Lu, W., Peng, Y., Rowlinson, S., & Huang, G. Q. (2015). Bridging BIM and building: from a literature review to an integrated conceptual framework. International journal of project management, 33(6), 1405–1416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.03.006.
Chien, K. F., Wu, Z. H., & Huang, S. C. (2014). Identifying and assessing critical risk factors for BIM projects: empirical study. Automation in Construction, 45, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.04.012.
Chu, P. C., & Spires, E. E. (2001). Does time constraint on users negate the efficacy of decision support systems? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85, 226–249. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2940.
Cordery, J. L., Morrison, D., Wright, B. M., & Wall, T. D. (2010). The impact of autonomy and task uncertainty on team performance: a longitudinal field study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 240–258. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.657.
Courtright, S. H., Thurgood, G. R., Stewart, G. L., & Pierotti, A. J. (2015). Structural interdependence in teams: an integrative framework and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1825–1846. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000027.
Crotty, R. (2012). The impact of building information modelling: transforming construction. Abingdon: Spon.
Davies, K., McMeel, D. J., & Wilkinson, S. (2017). Making friends with Frankenstein: hybrid practice in BIM. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 24, 78–93. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-04-2015-0061.
Davis, M. C. (2019). Socio-technical systems thinking and the design of comtemporary workspace. In O. B. Ayoko & N. M. Ashkanasy (Hrsg.), Organizational behaviour and the physical environment (S. 128–146). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315167237.
Davis, F. D., & Venkatesh, V. (1996). A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45(1), 19–45. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1996.0040.
Davis, M. C., Challenger, R., Jayewardene, D. N., & Clegg, C. W. (2014). Advancing socio-technical systems thinking: a call for bravery. Applied ergonomics, 45(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.02.009.
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499.
Demirkan, H., & Spohrer, J. (2015). T‑shaped innovators: identifying the right talent to support service innovation. Research-Technology Management, 58(5), 12–15. https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5805007.
Earley, P. C., Northcraft, G. B., Lee, C., & Lituchy, T. R. (1990). Impact of process and outcome feedback on the relation of goal setting to task performance. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 87–105. https://doi.org/10.5465/256353.
Eccles, R. G. (1981). The quasifirm in the construction industry. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2(4), 335–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(81)90013-5.
Espinosa, J. A., Slaughter, S. A., Kraut, R. E., & Herbsleb, J. D. (2007). Familiarity, complexity, and team performance in geographically distributed software development. Organization Science, 18, 613–630. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0297.
Ferreira, A., Antunes, P., & Herskovic, V. (2011). Improving group attention: an experiment with synchronous brainstorming. Group Decision and Negotiation, 20, 643–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-011-9233-y.
Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fischer, M., Ashcraft, H. W., Reed, D., & Khanzode, A. (2017). Integrating project delivery. A simple framework for putting IPD into action. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119179009.
Forgues, E. C., Carignan, V., Forgues, D., & Rajeb, S. B. (2016). A framework for improving collaboration patterns in BIM projects. In International conference on cooperative design, visualization and engineering (S. 34–42). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46771-9_5.
Friese, M. (1998). Kooperation als Wettbewerbsstrategie für Dienstleistungsunternehmen. Wiesbaden: Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-01487-4.
Geister, S., Konradt, U., & Hertel, G. (2006). Effects of process feedback on motivation, satisfaction, and performance in virtual teams. Small Group Research, 37, 459–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496406292337.
Handke, L., & Kauffeld, S. (2019). Alles eine Frage der Zeit? Herausforderungen virtueller Teams und deren Bewältigung am Beispiel der Softwareentwicklung. Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO), 50(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-019-00445-5.
Handke, L., Klonek, F. E., Parker, S. K., & Kauffeld, S. (2020). Interactive effects of team virtuality and work design on team functioning. Small Group Research, 51(1), 3–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496419863490.
Handke, L., Schulte, E.-M., Schneider, K., & Kauffeld, S. (2019). Teams, time, and technology: variations of media use over project phases. Small Group Research, 50(2), 266–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496418824151.
Hansen, M. T., & von Oetinger, B. (2001). Introducing T‑shaped managers. Knowledge management’s next generation. Harvard business review, 79(3), 106–116.
Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, U. (2005). Managing virtual teams: a review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15, 69–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2005.01.002.
Hertel, G., Konradt, U., & Orlikowski, B. (2004). Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320344000228.
Huang, W. W., & Wei, K. K. (2000). An empirical investigation of the effects of group support systems (GSS) and task type on group interactions from an influence perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 181–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2000.11045647.
Jackson, P. R., Wall, T. D., Martin, R., & Davids, K. (1993). New measures of job control, cognitive demand, and production responsibility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 753–762. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.5.753.
Jacobsson, M., & Merschbrock, C. (2018). BIM coordinators: a review. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25, 989–1008. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2017-0050.
Jasperson, J. S., Carter, P. E., & Zmud, R. W. (2005). A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems. MIS quarterly, 29(3), 525–557.
Jones, C., & Lichtenstein, B. B. (2009). Temporary inter-organizational projects: how temporal and social embeddedness enhance coordination and manage uncertainty. In S. Cropper, C. Huxham, M. Ebers & P. S. Ring (Hrsg.), The oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations (S. 231–255). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199282944.003.0009.
Kahai, S. S., Sosik, J. J., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Effects of leadership style, anonymity, and rewards on creativity-relevant processes and outcomes in an electronic meeting system context. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 499–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00049-3.
Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., Snoek, J. D., & Rosenthal, R. A. (1964). Occupational stress: studies in role conflict and ambiguity. New York: John Wiley.
Kauffeld, S., Handke, L., & Straube, J. (2016). Verteilt und doch verbunden: Virtuelle Teamarbeit. Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für angewandte Organisationspsychologie, 47(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-016-0308-8.
Kim, Y., Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (2002). Coordination structures and system restrictiveness in distributed group support systems. Group Decision and Negotiation, 11, 379–404. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020492305910.
Klemt-Albert, K. (2018). Durch die Digitalisierung zu mehr Produktivität in der Bauwirtschaft. Bautechnik, 95(3), 187–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/bate.201870303.
Kocijan, M. (2018). Digitalisierung im Bausektor. ifo Schnelldienst, 71(1), 42–45.
Kranzberg, M. (1986). Technology and history: “Kranzberg’s laws”. Technology and culture, 27(3), 544–560. https://doi.org/10.2307/3105385.
Laughlin, P. R., & Ellis, A. L. (1986). Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(86)90022-3.
Lichtblau, K., Schleiermacher, T., Goecke, H., & Schützdeller, P. (2018). Digitalisierung der KMU in Deutschland. Köln: IW Consult.
Linderoth, H. (2010). Understanding adoption and use of BIM as the creation of actor networks. Automation in Construction, 19(1), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2009.09.003.
Loose, A. (2001). Kooperationsverbünde und Unternehmensnetzwerke im Bau- und Ausbauhandwerk – Auf dem Weg zum „virtuellen“ Unternehmen? In J. Howaldt, R. Kopp & P. Flocken (Hrsg.), Kooperationsverbünde und regionale Modernisierung. Theorie und Praxis der Netzwerkarbeit (S. 143–157). Wiesbaden: Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-90831-5.
Malhotra, A., & Majchrzak, A. (2014). Enhancing performance of geographically distributed teams through targeted use of information and communication technologies. Human Relations, 67, 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713495284.
Manning, R., & Messner, J. (2008). Case studies in BIM implementation for programming of healthcare facilities. Electronic Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 13, 446–457.
Martínez-Moreno, E., Zornoza, A., Orengo, V., & Thompson, L. F. (2015). The effects of team self-guided training on conflict management in virtual teams. Group Decision and Negotiation, 24, 905–923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-014-9421-7.
Maznevski, M. L., & Chudoba, K. M. (2000). Bridging space over time: global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization Science, 11, 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.5.473.15200.
McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Miettinen, R., & Paavola, S. (2014). Beyond the BIM utopia: approaches to the development and implementation of building information modeling. Automation in construction, 43, 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.03.009.
Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1321–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321.
Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2008). Job and team design: toward a more integrative conceptualization of work design. In J. J. Martocchio (Hrsg.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Bd. 27, S. 39–91). London: Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0742-7301(08)27002-7.
Naegele, L., Kortsch, T., Paulsen, H., Wiemers, D., Kauffeld, S., & Frerichs, F. (2015). Zukunft im Blick: Trends erkennen, Kompetenzen entwickeln, Chancen nutzen. Drei Perspektiven auf die Zukunft des Handwerks. Braunschweig: Technische Universität Braunschweig. Projektbericht „Integrierte Kompetenzentwicklung im Handwerk“
Neff, G., Fiore-Silfvast, B., & Dossick, C. S. (2010). A case study of the failure of digital communication to cross knowledge boundaries in virtual construction. Information, Communication & Society, 13, 556–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691181003645970.
Ortiz De Guinea, A., Webster, J., & Staples, D. S. (2012). A meta-analysis of the consequences of virtualness on team functioning. Information & Management, 49, 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2012.08.003.
Painter, G., Posey, P., Austrom, D., Tenkasi, R., Barrett, B., & Merck, B. (2016). Sociotechnical systems design: coordination of virtual teamwork in innovation. Team Performance Management, 22, 354–369. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-12-2015-0060.
Parker, S., & Grote, G. (2020). Automation, algorithms, and beyond: why work design matters more than ever in a digital world. Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12241.
Parker, S. K., Van den Broeck, A., & Holman, D. (2017). Work design influences: a synthesis of multilevel factors that affect the design of jobs. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 267–308. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0054.
Schlicher, K. D., Paruzel, A., Steinmann, B., & Maier, G. W. (2018). Change Management für die Einführung digitaler Arbeitswelten. In G. Maier, G. Engels & E. Steffen (Hrsg.), Handbuch Gestaltung digitaler und vernetzter Arbeitswelten (S. 1–36). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
Schreiber, M., & Engelmann, T. (2010). Knowledge and information awareness for initiating transactive memory system processes of computer-supported collaborating ad hoc groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1701–1709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.019.
Sebastian, R. (2011). Changing roles of the clients, architects and contractors through BIM. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 18(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699981111111148.
Statistisches Bundesamt (2019). Ausgewählte Zahlen für die Bauwirtschaft. Wiesbaden: DeStatis. retrieved from https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Branchen-Unternehmen/Bauen/Publikationen/Downloads-Querschnitt/bauwirtschaft-1020210191054.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
Sträter, O., & Bengler, K. (2019). Positionspapier Digitalisierung der Arbeitswelt. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaften, 73, 243–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41449-019-00161-2.
Thomas, P. (2016). Branchenanalyse SHK-Handwerk: Aktuelle Herausforderungen und Chancen. Working Paper Forschungsförderung, No. 010. Düsseldorf: Hans- Böckler-Stiftung. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:101:1-201606092019
Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ulich, E. (2013). Arbeitssysteme als soziotechnische Systeme – eine Erinnerung. Journal Psychologie des Alltagshandelns, 6(1), 4–12.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x.
Wall, T. D., Corbett, J. M., Martin, R., Clegg, C. W., & Jackson, P. R. (1990). Advanced manufacturing technology, work design, and performance: a change study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 691–697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.6.691.
Wollny, V., & Paul, H. (2015). Die SWOT-Analyse: Herausforderungen der Nutzung in den Sozialwissenschaften. In M. Niederberger & S. Wassermann (Hrsg.), Methoden der Experten- und Stakeholdereinbindung in der sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung (S. 189–213). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01687-6_10.