Varieties of Process Tracing and Ways to Answer Why-Questions

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 12 - Trang 31-39 - 2012
Ingo Rohlfing1
1Cologne Graduate School in Management, Economics and Social Sciences (CGS), Faculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, University of Cologne, Germany

Tóm tắt

A fit between theory and method is essential in theory – guided empirical research. Achieving such a fit in process tracing is less straightforward than it may seem at first glance. There are two different types of processes that one can theorise and, consequently, two varieties of process tracing. The two varieties are introduced by empirical examples and distinguished with respect to four characteristics. Failure to determine the form of process tracing at hand may lead to invalid causal inferences.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Campbell, D.T. (1975) ‘Degrees of freedom and the case study’, Comparative Political Studies 8 (2): 178–193.

Checkel, J.T. (2008) ‘Process Tracing’, in A. Klotz and D. Prakash (eds.) Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 114–127.

George, A.L. and Bennett, A. (2005) Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences, Cambridge: MIT Press.

Gerring, J. (2007) ‘The mechanismic worldview: Thinking inside the box’, British Journal of Political Science 38 (1): 161–179.

Gerring, J. (2010) ‘Causal mechanisms: Yes, but…’, Comparative Political Studies 43 (11): 1499–1526.

Hall, P.A. (2003) ‘Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Research’, in J. Mahoney and D. Rueschemeyer (eds.) Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 373–404.

Hall, P.A. (2008) ‘Systematic process analysis’, European Political Science 7 (3): 304–317.

Hedström, P. and Ylikoski, P. (2010) ‘Causal mechanisms in the social sciences’, Annual Review of Sociology 36 (1): 49–67.

Jakobsen, M.L.F. (2010) ‘Untangling the impact of Europeanization and globalization on national utility liberalization’, Journal of European Public Policy 17 (6): 891–908.

Machamer, P., Darden, L. and Craver, C.F. (2000) ‘Thinking about mechanisms’, Philosophy of Science 67 (1): 1–25.

Mahoney, J. and Goertz, G. (2006) ‘A tale of two cultures: Contrasting quantitative and qualitative research’, Political Analysis 14 (3): 227–249.

March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P.O. (1989) Rediscovering Institutions, New York: Free Press.

Pierson, P. (2000) ‘The limits of design: Explaining institutional origins and change’, Governance 13 (4): 475–499.

Rosato, S. (2003) ‘The flawed logic of democratic peace theory’, American Political Science Review 97 (4): 585–602.

Schultz, K.A. (2001) Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Waldner, D. (forthcoming) ‘Process Tracing and Causal Mechanisms’, in H. Kincaid (ed.) Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press, (in press).

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Tập 12

31-39

Thông tin tác giả