Variation in leaf functional trait values within and across individuals and species: an example from a Costa Rican dry forest

Functional Ecology - Tập 24 Số 1 - Trang 217-223 - 2010
Catherine M. Hulshof1, Nathan G. Swenson2
1Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
2Center for Tropical Forest Science – Asia Program Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA

Tóm tắt

Summary 1. Patterns of species co‐existence and species diversity in plant communities remain an important research area despite over a century of intensive scrutiny. To provide mechanistic insight into the rules governing plant species co‐existence and diversity, plant community ecologists are increasingly quantifying functional trait values for the species found in a wide range of communities. 2. Despite the promise of a quantitative functional trait approach to plant community ecology, we suggest that, along with examining trait variation across species, an assessment of trait variation within species should also be a key component of a trait‐based approach to community ecology. Variability within and between individuals and populations is likely widespread due to plastic responses to highly localized abiotic and biotic interactions. 3. In this study, we quantify leaf trait variation within and across ten co‐existing tree species in a dry tropical forest in Costa Rica to ask: (i) whether the majority of trait variation is located between species, within species, within individuals or within the leaves themselves; (ii) whether trait values collected using standardized methods correlate with those collected using unstandardized methods; and (iii) to what extent can we differentiate plant species on the basis of their traits? 4. We find that the majority of variation in traits was often explained by between species differences; however, between leaflet trait variation was very high for compound‐leaved species. We also show that many species are difficult to reliably differentiate on the basis of functional traits even when sampling many individuals. 5. We suggest an ideal sample size of at least 10, and ideally 20, individuals be used when calculating mean trait values for individual species for entire communities, though even at large sample sizes, it remains unclear if community level trait values will allow comparisons on a larger geographic scale or if species traits are generally similar across scales. It will thus be critical to account for intraspecific variation by comparing species mean trait values across space in multiple microclimatic environments within local communities and along environmental gradients. Further, quantifying trait variability due to plasticity and inheritance will provide a better understanding of the underlying patterns and drivers of trait variation as well as the application of functional traits in outlining mechanisms of species co‐existence.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.01006.x

10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01741.x

10.1071/BT02124

10.1890/07-1134.1

10.2307/3237198

10.1038/44819

10.1890/03-0799

10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00661.x

Holdridge L.R., 1971, Forest Environments in Tropical Life Zones: A Pilot Study

10.1126/science.203.4387.1299

Hubbell S.P., 2001, The Unified Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography

Janzen D.H., 1980, Annotated check‐list of plants of lowland Guanacaste province, Costa Rica, exclusive of grasses and non‐vascular cryptogams, Brenesia, 18, 15

10.1126/science.1160662

10.1126/science.1169721

10.1007/s00442-006-0617-7

10.1111/j.1365-2745.2004.00838.x

R Development Core Team, 2005, R: A Language and Environment For Statistical Computing

Raunkiær C., 1934, The Life Forms of Plants and Statistical Plant Geography

10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01105.x

10.3732/ajb.93.6.829

Schimper A.F.W., 1903, Plant‐Geography Upon a Physiological Basis

10.1017/S0266467408005567

10.3732/ajb.94.3.451

10.3732/ajb.95.4.516

10.1890/08-1025.1

10.1890/06-1499.1

10.2307/3547051

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01238.x

10.1023/A:1004327224729

10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150452

10.1111/j.1469-185X.1967.tb01419.x

10.2307/3546836

10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01349.x