Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Định Giá Giảm Thiểu Rủi Ro Tử Vong: Sử Dụng Công Cụ Trực Quan Để Cải Thiện Độ Chính Xác Của Định Giá Có Điều Kiện
Tóm tắt
Chúng tôi nghiên cứu tính hợp lệ của các ước lượng từ định giá có điều kiện (CV) về giá trị mỗi cuộc sống thống kê (VSL). Chúng tôi kiểm tra sự nhạy cảm của ước lượng khả năng sẵn sàng chi trả (WTP) với độ lớn của sự giảm thiểu rủi ro tử vong và sự tương ứng theo lý thuyết của WTP với sự giảm thiểu rủi ro bằng cách sử dụng các công cụ trực quan khác nhau để truyền đạt rủi ro. Chúng tôi phát hiện rằng WTP nhạy cảm với độ lớn của sự giảm thiểu rủi ro đối với các tập mẫu độc lập của người trả lời được trình bày với từng công cụ trực quan thay thế trong số ba công cụ, nhưng không đối với tập mẫu được trình bày mà không có công cụ trực quan. Ước lượng WTP nhất quán với sự tương ứng theo tỷ lệ với sự giảm thiểu rủi ro cho các tập mẫu được trình bày với thang logarithmic hoặc một mảng 25.000 chấm, nhưng không đối với tập mẫu nhận thang tuyến tính. Những kết quả này gợi ý rằng CV có thể cung cấp những ước lượng hợp lệ của WTP cho việc giảm thiểu rủi ro tử vong nếu các phương pháp thích hợp được sử dụng để truyền đạt sự thay đổi rủi ro cho người trả lời.
Từ khóa
#định giá có điều kiện #giá trị mỗi cuộc sống thống kê #khả năng sẵn sàng chi trả #giảm thiểu rủi ro tử vong #trực quan hóa rủi roTài liệu tham khảo
Alberini, A. (1995). “Efficiency vs Bias of Willingness-to-Pay Estimates: Bivariate and Interval-Data Models,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29, 169–180.
Alberini, A., B. Kanninen, and R. T. Carson. (1997). “Modeling Response Incentive Effects in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Data,” Land Economics 73, 309–324.
Baron, J. (1997a). “Biases in Quantitative Measurement of Values for Public Decisions,” Psychological Bulletin 122, 72–88.
Baron, J. (1997b). “Confusion of Relative and Absolute Risk in Valuation,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 14, 301–309.
Beattie, J., J. Covey, P. Dolan, L. Hopkins, M. Jones-Lee, G. Loomes, N. Pidgeon, A. Robinson, and A. Spencer. (1998). “On the Contingent Valuation of Safety and the Safety of Contingent Valuation: Part 1—Caveat Investigator,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 17, 5–25.
Calman, K. C. and G. H. D. Royston. (1997). “Risk Language and Dialects,” British Medical Journal 315, 939–942.
Cameron, T. A. and J. Quiggin. (1994), “Estimation Using Contingent Valuation Data from a ‘Dichotomous Choice with Follow-Up’ Questionnaire,” Journal of Environmenta1 Economics and Management 27, 219–234.
Desvousges, W. H., R. F. Johnson, and R. W. Dunford, (1993). “Measuring Natural Resource Damages with Contingent Valuation: Tests of Validity and Reliability.” In J. A. Hausman (ed.), Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, pp. 91–164, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Diamond, P. A. and J. A. Hausman. (1994). “Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better Than No Number?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(4), 45–64.
Eom, Y. S. (1994). “Pesticide Residue Risk and Food Safety Valuation: A Random Utility Approach,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76, 760–771.
Featherstonhaugh, D., P. Slovic, S. M. Johnson, and J. Friedrich. (1997). “Insensitivity to the Value of Human Life: A Study of Psychological Numbing,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 14, 283–300.
Fischhoff, B. and L. Furby. (1988). “Measuring Values: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Transactions with Special Reference to Contingent Valuation of Visibility,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1, 147–184.
Fisher, A., L. G. Chestnut, and D. M. Violette. (1989a). “The Value of Reducing Risks of Death: A Note on New Evidence,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 8, 88–100.
Fisher, A., G. H. McClelland, and W. D. Schulze. (1989b). “Communicating Risk Under Title III of SARA: Strategies for Explaining Very Small Risks in a Community Context,” Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association 39, 271–276.
Frederick, S. and B. Fischhoff. (1998). “Scope (In)Sensitivity in Elicited Valuations,” Risk Decision and Policy 3, 109–124.
Gigerenzer, G. (1995). “How to Improve Bayesian Reasoning without Instruction: Frequency Formats,” Psychological Review 102, 684–704.
Gigerenzer, G. (1996). “The Psychology of Good Judgement: Frequency Formats and Simple Algorithms,” Medical Decision Making 16, 273–280.
Gomez, U. A. L. (1990). “Communicating Very Low Probability Events,” unpublished dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University.
Hammitt, J. K. (1986). Estimating Consumer Willingness to Pay to Reduce Food-Borne Risk, R-3447-EPA, Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
Hammitt, J. K. (1990). “Risk Perceptions and Food Choice: An Exploratory Analysis of Organic-Versus Conventional-Produce Buyers,” Risk Analysis 10, 367–374.
Hammitt, J. K. (2000a). “Evaluating Contingent Valuation of Environmental Health Risks: The Proportionality Test,” Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Newsletter, May.
Hammitt, J. K. (2000b). “Valuing Mortality Risk: Theory and Practice,” Environmental Science and Technology 34, 1396–1400.
Hammitt, J. K. and J. D. Graham. (1999). “Willingness to Pay for Health Protection: Inadequate Sensitivity to Probability?” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 18, 33–62.
Hanemann, M., J. Loomis, and B. Kanninen. (1991). “Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73, 1255–1261.
Hsee, C. K. (1996). “The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 67, 247–257.
Johannesson, M., B. Jonsson, and L. Borgquist. (1991). “Willingness to Pay for Antihypertensive Therapy— Results of a Swedish Pilot Study.” Journal of Health Economics 10, 461–473.
Johannesson, M., P.-O. Johansson, B. Kristom, and U.-G. Gerdtham. (1993). “Willingness to Pay for Antihypertensive Therapy—Further Results,” Journal of Health Economics 12, 95–108.
Jones-Lee, M. W. (1974). “The Value of Changes in the Probability of Death or Injury,” Journal of Political Economy 82, 835–849.
Jones-Lee, M. W., M. Hammerton, and P. R. Philips. (1985). “The Value of Safety: Results of a National Survey,” Economic Journal 95, 49–72.
Jones-Lee, M. W., G. Loomes, and P. R. Philips. (1995). “Valuing the Prevention of Non-fatal Road Injuries: Contingent Valuation vs. Standard Gambles,” Oxford Economic Papers 47, 676–695.
Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky. (1979). “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,” Econometrica 47, 263–291.
Kahneman, D., I. Ritov, and D. Schkade. (1999). “Economic Preferences or Attitude Expression?: An Analysis of Dollar Responses to Public Issues,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19, 203–235.
Kanninen, B. J. (1995). “Bias in Discrete Response Contingent Valuation,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 28, 114–125.
Kaplan, R. M., B. Hammel, and L. E. Schimmel. (1985). “Patient Information Processing and the Decision to Accept Treatment,” Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 1, 113–120.
Kartman, B., F. Andersson, and M. Johannesson. (1996). “Willingness to Pay for Reductions in Angina Pectoris Attacks,” Medical Decision Making 16, 248–253.
Kidholm, K. (1995). “Assessing the Value of Traffic Safety Using the Contingent Valuation Technique: The Danish Survey,” In C. N. Schwab and N. Soguel (eds.), Contingent Valuation, Transport Safety, and the Value of Life, pp. 45–61, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kunreuther, H., R. Ginsberg, L. Miller, P. Sagi, P. Slovic, B. Borkan, and N. Katz. (1978). Disaster Insurance Protection: Public Policy Lessons. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Li, C.-Z. and L. Mattson. (1995). “Discrete Choice under Preference Uncertainty: An improved Structural Model for Contingent Valuation,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 28, 256–269.
Lin, C.-T. J. and J. W. Milon. (1995). “Contingent Valuation of Health Risk Reductions for Shellfish Products,” In J. A. Caswell (ed.), Valuing Food Safety and Nutrition, pp. 83–114. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Liu, J.-T., J. K. Hammitt, and J.-L., Liu. (1997). “Estimated Hedonic Wage Function and Value of Life in a Developing Country,” Economic Letters 57, 353–358.
Loomis, J. B. and P. H. duVair. (1993). “Evaluating the Effect of Alternative Risk Communication Devices on Willingness to Pay: Results from a Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Experiment.” Land Economics 69, 287–298.
Machina, M. J. (1987). “Choice under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 1, 121–154.
Mitchell, R. C. and R. T. Carson. (1986). “Valuing Drinking Water Risk Reductions Using the Contingent Valuation Method: A Methodological Study of Risks from THM and Giardia.” Draft Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Mitchell, R. C. and R. T. Carson. (1989). Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
Moschandreas, D. J. and P. E. Chang. (1994). “On the Use of a Risk Ladder: Linking Public Perception of Risks Associated with Indoor Air with Cognitive Elements and Attitudes Toward Risk Reduction,” Atmospheric Environment 28, 3093–3098.
Muller, A. and T. J. Reutzel. (1984). “Willingness to Pay for Reduction in Fatality Risk: An Exploratory Survey,” American Journal of Public Health 74, 808–812.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (1994), “Natural Resource Damage Assessments: Proposed Rules,” Federal Register 59, 1062–1191.
Pratt, J. W. and R. J. Zeckhauser. (1996). “Willingness to Pay and the Distribution of Risk and Wealth,” Journal of Political Economy 104, 747–763.
Quiggin, J. (1982). “A Theory of Anticipated Utility,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3, 323–343.
Ready, R. C., J. C. Whitehead, and G. C. Blomquist. (1995). “Contingent Valuation when Respondents are Ambivalent,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29, 181–196.
Sandman, P. M., N. D. Weinstein, and P. Miller. (1994). “High Risk or Low: How Location on a ‘Risk Ladder’ Affects Perceived Risk,” Risk Analysis 14, 35–45.
Smith, V. K. and W. H. Desvousges. (1987). “An Empirical Analysis of the Economic Value of Risk Changes,” Journal of Political Economy 95, 89–114.
Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman. (1992). “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5, 297–323.
Viscusi, W. K. (1985). “A Bayesian Perspective on Biases in Risk Perception,” Economic Letters 17, 59–62.
Viscusi, W. K., W. Magat, and J. Huber. (1987). “An Investigation of the Rationality of Consumer Valuations of Multiple Health Risk,” RAND Journal of Economics 18, 465–479.
Viscusi, W. K. (1989). “Prospective Reference Theory: Toward an Explanation of the Paradoxes,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2, 235–263.
Viscusi, W. K. (1993). “The Value of Risks to Life and Health.” Journal of Economic Literature 31, 1912–1946.
Viscusi, W. K. (1998). Rational Risk Policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Weinstein, M. C., D. S. Shepard, and J. S. Pliskin. (1980). “The Economic Value of Changing Mortality Probabilities: A Decision-Theoretic Approach,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 94, 373–396.
Weinstein, N. D., P. M. Sandman, and W. K. Hallman. (1994). “Testing a Visual Display to Explain Small Probabilities,” Risk Analysis 14, 895–108.
