Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand Version of the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH-JSSH) questionnaire
Tóm tắt
The Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire is a region-specific, self-administered questionnaire, which consists of a disability/symptom (QuickDASH-DS) scale, and the same two optional modules, the work (DASH-W) and the sport/music (DASH-SM) modules, as the DASH. After the Japanese version of DASH (DASH-JSSH) was cross-culturally adapted and developed, we made the Japanese version of QuickDASH (QuickDASH-JSSH) by extracting 11 out of 30 items of the DASH-JSSH regarding disability/symptoms. The purpose of this study was to test the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of QuickDASH-JSSH. A series of 72 patients with upper extremity disorders completed the QuickDASH-JSSH, the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain. Thirty-eight of the patients were reassessed for test–retest reliability 1 or 2 weeks later. Reliability was investigated by the reproducibility and internal consistency. To analyze the validity, a principal component analysis and the correlation coefficients between the QuickDASH-JSSH and the SF-36 were obtained. The responsiveness was examined by calculating the standardized response mean (SRM; mean change/SD) and effect size (mean change/SD of baseline value) after carpal tunnel release of the 17 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient in the QuickDASH-DS was 0.88. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the same was 0.82. The unidimensionality of the QuickDASH-DS was confirmed. The correlation coefficients between the QuickDASH-DS and the DASH-DS, DASH-W, or the DASH-SM were 0.92, 0.81, or 0.76, respectively. The correlation coefficients between the QuickDASH-DS score and the subscales of the SF-36 ranged from −0.29 to −0.73. The correlation coefficient between the QuickDASH-DS score and the VAS for pain was 0.52. The SRM/effect size of QuickDASH-DS was −0.54/−0.37, which indicated moderate sensitivity. The Japanese version of QuickDASH has equivalent evaluation capacities to the original QuickDASH.
Tài liệu tham khảo
J Dawson A Carr (2001) ArticleTitleOutcomes evaluation in orthopaedics J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 83 313–5 10.1302/0301-620X.83B3.12148 Occurrence Handle10.1302/0301-620X.83B3.12148 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzgvFKhtg%3D%3D
CR Constant AHG Murley (1987) ArticleTitleA clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder Clin Orthop 214 160–4 Occurrence Handle3791738
InstitutionalAuthorNameResearch Committee, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons RR Richards KN An LU Bigliani RJ Friedman GM Gartsman AG Gristina et al. (1994) ArticleTitleA standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function J Shoulder Elbow Surg 3 347–52 10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80019-0 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80019-0
A Kirkley S Griffin H McLintock L Ng (1998) ArticleTitleThe development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for shoulder instability. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) Am J Sports Med 26 764–72 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FmslOlsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9850776
DW Levine BP Simmons MJ Koris LH Daltroy GG Hohl AH Fossel et al. (1993) ArticleTitleA self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 75 1585–92 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2FmsVOjsg%3D%3D
DP Martin R Engelberg J Agel MF Swiontkowski (1997) ArticleTitleComparison of the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Questionnaire with the Short Form 36, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and the Sickness Impact Profile Health-Status Measures J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 79 1323–35 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2svlvVSmsg%3D%3D
PL Hudak PC Amadio C Bombardier InstitutionalAuthorNamethe Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG) (1996) ArticleTitleDevelopment of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected] Am J Ind Med 29 602–8 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO;2-L Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO;2-L Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK28zmvFOrsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8773720
AM Davis DE Beaton P Hudak P Amadio C Bombardier D Cole et al. (1999) ArticleTitleMeasuring disability of the upper extremity: a rationale supporting the use of a regional outcome measure J Hand Ther 12 269–74 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FosF2jtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10622192
T Imaeda S Toh Y Nakao J Nishida H Hirata M Ijichi et al. (2005) ArticleTitlefor the Impairment Evaluation Committee, Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand. Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand Version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH-JSSH) Questionnaire J Orthop Sci 10 353–9 10.1007/s00776-005-0917-5 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00776-005-0917-5 Occurrence Handle16075166
I Atroshi C Gummesson B Andersson E Dahlgren A Johansson (2000) ArticleTitleThe disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients Acta Orthop Scand 71 613–8 10.1080/000164700317362262 Occurrence Handle10.1080/000164700317362262 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2Fos1Glsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11145390
T Dubert P Voche C Dumontier A Dinh (2001) ArticleTitleLe questionnaire DASH. Adaptation française d’un outil d’évaluation international (in French) Chir Main 20 294–302 10.1016/S1297-3203(01)00049-X Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1297-3203(01)00049-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrjsFCqsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11582907
M Offenbaecher T Ewert O Sangha G Stucki (2002) ArticleTitleValidation of a German version of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH-G) J Rheumatol 29 401–2 Occurrence Handle11838867
RS Rosales EB Delgado ID De La Lastra-Bosch (2002) ArticleTitleEvaluation of the Spanish version of the DASH and Carpal Tunnel Syndrome health-related quality-of-life instruments: cross-cultural adaptation process and reliability J Hand Surg [Am] 27 334–43 10.1053/jhsu.2002.30059 Occurrence Handle10.1053/jhsu.2002.30059
MM Veehof EJA Sleegers NHMJ van Veldhoven AH Schuurman NLU Van Meeteren (2002) ArticleTitlePsychometric qualities of the Dutch language version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH-DLV) J Hand Ther 15 347–54 Occurrence Handle12449349 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0894-1130(02)80006-0
R Padua L Padua E Ceccarelli E Romanini G Zanoli PC Amadio et al. (2003) ArticleTitleItalian version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation J Hand Surg [Br] 28 179–86 10.1016/S0266-7681(02)00303-0 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s3jt1antw%3D%3D
EWC Lee JSY Lau MMH Chung APS Li SK Lo (2004) ArticleTitleEvaluation of the Chinese version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH-HKPWH): cross-cultural adaptation process, internal consistency and reliability study J Hand Ther 17 417–23 Occurrence Handle15538683
DE Beaton JN Katz AH Fossel JG Wright V Tarasuk (2001) ArticleTitleMeasuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity J Hand Ther 14 128–46 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3psFOrsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11382253
DE Beaton JG Wright JN Katz InstitutionalAuthorNameUpper Extremity Collaborative Group (2005) ArticleTitleDevelopment of the QuickDASH: comparison of the three item-reduction approaches J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 87 1038–46 10.2106/JBJS.D.02060 Occurrence Handle10.2106/JBJS.D.02060
DE Beaton C Bombardier F Guillemin MB Ferraz (2000) ArticleTitleGuidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures Spine 25 3186–91 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7jt1Cmug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11124735
F Guillemin C Bombardier D Beaton (1993) ArticleTitleCross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines J Clin Epidemiol 46 1417–32 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N Occurrence Handle10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2Foslalsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8263569
S Fukuhara S Bito J Green A Hsiao K Kurokawa (1998) ArticleTitleTranslation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 health survey for use in Japan J Clin Epidemiol 51 1037–44 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00095-X Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00095-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2Fjt1Sisw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9817121
S Fukuhara JE Ware SuffixJr M Kosinski S Wada B Gandek (1998) ArticleTitlePsychometric and clinical tests of validity of the Japanese SF-36 health survey J Clin Epidemiol 51 1045–53 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00096-1 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00096-1 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2Fjt1SisA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9817122
MH Liang AH Fossel MG Larson (1990) ArticleTitleComparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation Med Care 28 632–42 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00005650-199007000-00008 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3czgvFCgsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle2366602
LE Kazis JJ Anderson RF Meenan (1989) ArticleTitleEffect sizes for interpreting changes in health status Med Care 27 IssueIDsuppl S178–89 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00005650-198903001-00015 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL1M7lvVehsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle2646488
CA McHorney AR Tarlov (1995) ArticleTitleIndividual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 4 293–307 10.1007/BF01593882 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01593882 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK28%2FksFamsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle7550178
Y Suzukamo S Fukuhara S Kikuchi S Konno M Roland Y Iwamoto et al. (2003) ArticleTitleCommittee on Science Project, Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Validation of the Japanese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire J Orthop Sci 8 543–8 10.1007/s00776-003-0679-x Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00776-003-0679-x Occurrence Handle12898308
H Hashimoto T Hanyu CB Sledge EA Lingard (2003) ArticleTitleValidation of a Japanese patient-derived outcome scale for assessing total knee arthroplasty: comparison with Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) J Orthop Sci 8 288–93 10.1007/s10776-002-0629-0 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10776-002-0629-0 Occurrence Handle12768467
RE Gay PC Amadio JC Johnson (2003) ArticleTitleComparative responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release J Hand Surg [Am] 28 250–4 10.1053/jhsu.2003.50043 Occurrence Handle10.1053/jhsu.2003.50043