Using short films for the effective promotion of entrepreneurship

Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research - Tập 5 - Trang 1-9 - 2015
Leonidas A. Zampetakis1, Manolis Lerakis1, Konstantinos Kafetsios2, Vassilis Moustakis1
1Technical University of Crete, School of Production Engineering & Management, Management Systems Laboratory, University Campus, Chania, Crete Greece
2Department of Psychology, University of Crete, School of Social Sciences, Crete, Greece

Tóm tắt

Mass media formats such as films may affect attitude and behavior at social, group or individual level. Existing literature lack sufficient evidence and results on the way according to which, films may influence in a positive manner entrepreneurial attitude. Research and results reported herein provide insight with respect to different executional factor formats that can be used in the design of effective short-films aimed toward fostering positive entrepreneurial attitude. Drawing on a sample of 221 engineering students and by means of Conjoint Analysis, we launched an experimental investigation aiming to understand perceived preferences for different combinations of short films’ executional characteristics. Results suggest that the source of the message is perceived as the most important factor for the construction of effective short films followed by the length of the film. Research results reported herein represent a first step towards the better understanding of the design and construction of effective audiovisual means for the promotion of entrepreneurship and hence maximize the use of limited funding sources.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. Asbeek Brusse, ED, Fransen, ML, & Smit, EG. (2015). Educational storylines in entertainment television: audience reactions toward persuasive strategies in medical dramas. Journal of Health Communication, 20(4), 396–405. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265–299. Baumeister, RF, Vohs, KD, DeWall, CN, & Zhang, L. (2007). How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 167–203. Baumgartner, H, Pieters, R, & Bagozzi, RP. (2008). Future-oriented emotions: Conceptualization and behavioral effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(4), 685–696. Boyle, R. (2008). From troubleshooter to the apprentice: the changing face of business on British television. Media Culture Society, 30, 415–424. Champoux, J. (1999). Film as a teaching resource. Journal of Management Inquiry, 8, 206–217. Dunphy, S, Meyer, D, & Linton, S. (2008). The top ten greatest screen legends and what their definitive roles demonstrate about management and organizational behaviour. Behavior & Information Technology, 27(2), 183–188. Eikhof, DR, Summers, J, & Carter, S. (2013). “Women doing their own thing”: media representations of female entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 19(5), 547–564. Fox, J, Arena, D, & Bailenson, JN. (2009). Virtual reality. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 21(3), 95–113. Fox, J, & Bailenson, JN. (2009). Virtual self-modeling: the effects of vicarious reinforcement and identification on exercise behaviors. Media Psychology, 12(1), 1–25. Grichnik, D, Smeja, A, & Welpe, I. (2010). The importance of being emotional: How do emotions affect entrepreneurial opportunity evaluation and exploitation? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 76(1), 15–29. Hang, M, & Van Weezle, A. (2007). Media and entrepreneurship: a survey of the literature relating both concepts. Journal of Media Business Studies, 4(1), 51–70. Hanisch, DN, & Rau, SB. (2014). Application of metric conjoint analysis in family business research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 72–84. Hindle, K, & Klyver, K. (2007). Exploring the relationship between media coverage and participation in entrepreneurship: Initial global evidence and research implications. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 3(2), 217–242. Kitchen, PJ, Kerr, G, Schultz, DE, McColl, R, & Pals, H. (2014). The elaboration likelihood model: review, critique and research agenda. European Journal of Marketing, 48(11/12), 2033–2050. Klyver, K, & Hindle, K. (2007). Entrepreneurship and mass media: audiences’ perceptions of entrepreneurship stories in mass media. In AGSE 2007- Regional frontiers of entrepreneurship research 2007 (Proceedings of the 4th Regional Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research conference, 2007, pp. 1083–1095). Lohrke, FT, Holloway, BB, & Woolley, TW. (2010). Conjoint analysis in entrepreneurship research a review and research agenda. Organizational Research Methods, 13(1), 16–30. McGuire, WJ. (1989). Theoretical foundations of campaigns. In RE Ric & CK Atkin (Eds.), Public communication campaigns (pp. 43–65). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Petty, RE, Brinol, P, & Priester, JR. (2009). Mass media attitude change: implications of the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In J Bryant & MB Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 125–164). New York: Routledge. Petty, RE, & Cacioppo, JT. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown Company Publishers. Radu, M, & Redien-Collot, R. (2008). The social representation of entrepreneurs in the French press: desirable and feasible models. International Small Business Journal, 26(3), 259–298. Rothman, AJ, Bartels, RD, Wlaschin, J, & Salovey, P. (2006). The strategic use of gain- and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: How theory can inform practice. Journal of Communication, 56(S1), S202–S220. Rothman, AJ, & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 3–19. Ryffel, FA, Wirz, DS, Kühne, R, & Wirth, W. (2014). How emotional media reports influence attitude formation and change: the interplay of attitude base, attitude certainty, and persuasion. Media Psychology, 17(4), 397–419. Shepherd, DA, & Zacharakis, A. (2003). A new venture’s cognitive legitimacy: an assessment by customers. Journal of Small Business Management, 41(2), 148–167. Singhal, A, & Rogers, EM. (2002). A theoretical agenda for entertainment - education. Communication Theory, 12(2), 117–135. Singhal, A, Wang, H, & Rogers, EM. (2013). The entertainment-education communication strategy in communication campaigns. In RE Rice & C Atkins (Eds.), Public communication campaigns (4th ed., pp. 321–334). Beverley Hills, CA: Sage. Stenholm, P, Acs, ZJ, & Wuebker, R. (2013). Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 176–193. Stewart, D, & Furse, D. (1984). Analysis of the impact of executional factors on advertising performance. Journal of Advertising Research, 24, 21–32. Uskul, AK, & Oyserman, D. (2010). When message-frame fits salient cultural-frame, messages feel more persuasive. Psychology and Health, 25(3), 321–337. Wells, W. D. (2014). Measuring advertising effectiveness. New York, USA: Psychology Press. Wilson, EJ, & Sherrell, DL. (1993). Source effects in communication and persuasion research: a meta-analysis of effect size. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21(2), 101–112. Wongnaa, G.A., & Seyram, A.Z.K. (2014). Factors influencing polytechnic students’ decision to graduate as entrepreneurs. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 2(2), doi:10.1186/2251-7316-2-2