Using multiple survey vendors to collect health outcomes information: How accurate are the data?

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes - Tập 1 - Trang 1-6 - 2003
Samuel C Haffer1,2
1Quality Measurement and Health Assessment Group, U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, USA
2Policy Sciences Graduate Program, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, USA

Tóm tắt

To measure and assess health outcomes and quality of life at the national level, large-scale surveys using multiple vendors to gather health information is becoming the norm. This study evaluates the ability of multiple survey vendors to gather and report data collected as part of the 1998 Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (HOS). Four hundred randomly sampled completed mailed surveys were chosen from each of six certified vendors (N = 2397) participating in the 1998 HOS. The accuracy of the data gathered from the vendors was measured by creating a "gold standard" record for each survey and comparing it to the final record submitted by the vendor. Overall rates of agreement were calculated, and ranged from 97.0% to 99.8% across the vendors. Researchers may be confident that using multiple vendors to gather health outcomes information will yield accurate data.

Tài liệu tham khảo

National Committee for Quality Assurance: Health of Seniors Manual.: HEDIS 3.0/1998 Volume 6. Washington, DC 1998. Bierman AS, Lawrence WF, Haffer SC, Clancy CM: Functional Health Outcomes as a Measure of Health Care Quality for Medicare Beneficiaries. Health Services Research 2001,35(6 Part II):90–108. Marciniak TA, Ellerbeck EF, Radford MJ, Kresowik TF, Gold JA, Krumholz HM, Kiefe CI, Allman RM, Vogel RA, Jencks SF: Improving the quality of care for Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction: Results from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project pilot. Journal of the American Medical Association 1998, 279: 1351–1357. 10.1001/jama.279.17.1351 Marciniak TA, Mosedale L, Ellerbeck EF: Quality Improvement at the National Level: Lessons from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. Evaluation & The Health Professions 1998,21(4):525–536.