Using eyewitnesses to promote students’ understanding of empathy in the history classroom

Hanneke Bartelds1, Geerte M. Savenije1, Jannet van Drie1, Carla van Boxtel2
1Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 15776, 1001 NG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
2Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam School of Historical Studies, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 15776, 1001 NG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Empathy is important in our digitized and polarized world and an important aspect of education. What contribution can history teachers make to develop this in their students? In this study we investigated whether a lesson unit making use of eyewitnesses and designed from six pedagogical principles, resulted in more confidence in the ability to empathize, attributed importance to empathy and understanding of empathy by 10th grade students. In addition, we investigated the differences between two conditions: the use of a guest speaker versus eyewitnesses in a documentary. In this quasi-experimental intervention study, we used a pretest-posttest-follow-up design. The data were collected via questionnaires containing closed and open questions. The results showed that students (N = 97) in both conditions gained confidence in their ability to empathize and improved their ability to explain what empathy means and why it is important. After two months, progress on these items was still significant. In the condition with the guest speaker students scored significantly higher on understanding empathy than students who participated in the lesson unit with the documentary. This study contributes to the understanding of developing empathy through the use of eyewitnesses in history classes and the measurement of students’ understanding of empathy.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Allport G., 1954, The nature of prejudice Ashby R., 1987, The history curriculum for teachers, 62 10.1177/016146811511700202 10.1126/science.1210789 10.1080/00933104.2020.1808131 10.4324/9781410610508 10.3102/0002831217694833 10.4018/978-1-5225-7461-3.ch008 10.1108/SSRP-03-2008-B0005 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199539956.001.0001 De Leur T., Van Boxtel C., Huijgen T. (2021). No, no, the Cold War was not that dramatic: A case study on the use of a drama task to promote Dutch secondary school students’ historical imagination. History Education Research Journal, 18(1), 28-45. https://doi.org/10.14324/HERJ.18.L03 10.1080/00071005.2017.1291902 10.1002/9781119100812.ch8 10.5014/ajot.55.5.566 Gehlbach H., 2012, Teachers College Record, 114, 197 10.1080/00933104.2012.757265 10.2307/j.ctvss40kr.17 Goldberg B.Z., 2001, (Promises 10.1080/00377996.2019.1693949 Huijgen T., Holthuis P. (2016). Dutch voices: Exploring the role of oral history. Dutch Secondary History Teaching. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306264009 10.1007/s10212-014-0219-4 10.1111/j.1751-228X.2007.00004.x 10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101873 Lanman B., 1987, International Journal of Oral History, 122 Lee P., 2001, Historical empathy and perspective taking in the social studies, 21 Levesque S., 2008, Thinking historically: Educating students for the twenty-first century 10.1057/978-1-349-95019-5 10.4324/9780203862995 Marcus A., 2007, The History Teacher, 40, 303 10.1080/00377990903283957 10.1108/SSRP-11-2017-0064 10.1057/9780230101395_2 10.1037/0012-1649.12.2.175 10.1016/B978-0-12-801872-9.00004-1 10.1080/00309230.2012.709524 10.1037/edu0000143 Tajfel H., 1986, Psychology of intergroup relations, 7 Titchener E., 1909, Experimental psychology of the thought process 10.1007/BF00991638 10.1080/07370008.2012.661813 10.1007/s11165-011-9273-y 10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.040 Wagenaar W., 2017, Waar leer je discrimineren? Waar jongeren negatieve ideeen opdoen over anderen Wineburg S., 2001, Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past 10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.314 Zachrich L., Weller A., Baron C., Bertram C. (2020). Historical experiences: A framework for encountering complex historical sources. History Education Research Journal, 17(2), 243-275. https://doi.org/10.18546/HERJ.17.2.08. Online. 10.2307/1129815