Using Actors as Simulated Patients for Interprofessional Education
Tóm tắt
Interprofessional education (IPE) in health profession training is recognized as a key to improving patient care in practice settings. Though recognized as extremely important, implementation of IPE remains a challenge for many health profession programs. Despite challenges, the seven health profession (HP) programs at D’Youville College initiated IPE using healthcare simulation with professional actors serving as simulated patients. Faculty from chiropractic, dietetics, nursing, occupational therapy, pharmacy, physical therapy and physician assistant programs collaborated in this year-long implementation process. This manuscript provides a description of the planning, delivery and assessment of this innovative interprofessional simulation and the creation of the campus Interprofessional Clinical Advancement Center. Students reported enhanced understanding and respect of professional roles and responsibilities and ability to communicate effectively. Faculty reported an ability to encourage interaction and collaboration among HP students. Suggestions for curricular improvements and program sustainability included professional development and compensation. This manuscript should assist other health professional programs seeking guidance to implement and evaluate interprofessional education in academic institutions.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Panel IECE. Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: Report of an expert panel: Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel; 2011.
Schroder C, Medves J, Paterson M, Byrnes V, Chapman C, O’Riordan A, et al. Development and pilot testing of the collaborative practice assessment tool. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2011;25(3):189–95.
WHO. Transformative scale up of health professional ⋯ 2011:[20p. p.]. Available from: https://doi.org/www.who.int/hrh/resources/transformative_education/en/-22k.
Scherer YK, Bruce SA, Graves BT, Erdley WS. Acute care nurse practitioner education: Enhancing performance through the use of clinical simulation. AACN Advanced Critical Care. 2003;14(3):331–41.
Issenberg SB, Scalese RJ. Simulation in health care education. Perspectives in biology and medicine. 2008;51(1):31–46. Epub 2008/01/15.
Baker C, Pulling C, McGraw R, Dagnone JD, Hopkins-Rosseel D, Medves J. Simulation in interprofessional education for patient-centred collaborative care. Journal of advanced nursing. 2008;64(4):372–9. Epub 2008/09/04.
Gillespie M, Peterson BL. Helping novice nurses make effective clinical decisions: the situated clinical decision-making framework. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2009;30(3):164–70. Epub 2009/07/18.
Bray BS, Schwartz CR, Odegard PS, Hammer DP, Seybert AL. Assessment of human patient simulation-based learning. American journal of pharmaceutical education. 2011;75(10):208. Epub 2012/02/22.
Barrows HS. An overview of the uses of standardized patients for teaching and evaluating clinical skills. AAMC. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 1993;68(6):443–51; discussion 51–3. Epub 1993/06/01.
Ladyshewsky R, Baker R, Jones M, Nelson L. Evaluating clinical performance in physical therapy with simulated patients. Journal of Physical Therapy Education. 2000;14(1):31–7.
Covey SR. The seven habits of highly effective people: restoring the character ethic. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1989. 340 s. p.
Dreifuerst KT. The essentials of debriefing in simulation learning: a concept analysis. Nursing Education Perspectives. 2009;30(2):109+.
Cantrell MA. The importance of debriefing in clinical simulations. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2008;4(2):e19–e23.
Van Heukelom JN, Begaz T, Treat R. Comparison of postsimulation debriefing versus in-simulation debriefing in medical simulation. Simulation in Healthcare. 2010;5(2):91.
Fanning RMG, D.M. The Role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Society for Simulation in Healthcare. 2007;2(2):115–25.