Uses of Agent‐Based Modeling in Innovation/New Product Development Research<sup>*</sup>

Journal of Product Innovation Management - Tập 22 Số 5 - Trang 380-398 - 2005
Rosanna Garcia1
1northeastern Univ.

Tóm tắt

Little has been written in the new product development literature about the simulation technique agent‐based modeling, which is a by‐product of recent explorations into complex adaptive systems in other disciplines. Agent‐based models (ABM) are commonly used in other social sciences to represent individual actors (or groups) in a dynamic adaptive system. The social system may be a marketplace, an organization, or any type of system that acts as a collective of individuals. Agents represent autonomous decision‐making entities that interact with each other and/or with their environment based on a set of rules. These rules dictate the behavioral choices of the agents. In these simulation models, heterogeneous agents interact with each other in a repetitive process. It is from the interactions between agents that aggregate macroscale behaviors or trends emerge. The simulated environment can be thought of as a “virtual” society in which actions taken by one agent may have an effect on the resulting actions of another agent.This article is an introduction to the ABM methodology and its possible uses for innovation and new product development researchers. It explores the benefits and issues with modeling dynamic systems using this methodology. Benefits of ABMs found in sociology and management studies have found that as the heterogeneity of individuals increase in a system or as network effects become more important in a system, the effectiveness of ABMs as a methodology increases. Additionally, the more adaptive a system or the more the system evolves over time, the greater the opportunity to learn more about the adaptive system using ABMs. Limitations to using this methodology include some knowledge of computer‐programming techniques.Three potential areas of research are introduced: diffusion of innovations, organizational strategy, and knowledge and information flows. A common use of ABMs in the extant literature has been the modeling of the diffusion process between networked heterogeneous agents. ABMs easily allow the modeling of different types of networks and the impact of these networks on the diffusion process. A demonstrative example of an agent‐based model to address the research question of how should manufacturers allocate resources to research (exploration) and development (exploitation) projects is provided. Future courses of study using ABMs also are explored.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Albert Reka, 2002, Statistical Methods of Complex Networks, Reviews of Modern Physics, 74, 47, 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.47

10.1287/orsc.10.3.216

Anthes Gary H.(January 2003). Software Agents Tame Supply Chain Complexity and Optimize Performance. Available at:http://computerworld.com/softwaretopics/evp/story/0 10801 77855 00.html(accessed June 23 2005).

Axelrod Robert, 1997, The Complexity of Cooperation

Barabási Albert‐László, 2002, Linked: the New Science of Networks

10.1287/mnsc.15.5.215

10.1287/orsc.10.3.237

10.1073/pnas.082080899

10.2307/257001

Christensen Clayton, M., 1997, The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail

10.1109/4235.956711

Dawkins Richard, 1976, The Selfish Gene

Debenham JohnandWilkinson Ian(2003). Exploitation versus Exploration in Market Competition.SSRN Working Papers. Available at:http://research.it.uts.edu.au/emarkets/evolut/(accessed June 23 2005).

Downs Roger M., 1973, Image and Environments: Cognitive Mapping and Spatial Behavior, 8

10.7551/mitpress/3374.001.0001

Erdős Paul, 1959, On Random Graphs, I. Publicationes Mathematicae (Debrecen), 6, 290, 10.5486/PMD.1959.6.3-4.12

Farrell Winslow, 1998, How Hits Happen: Forecasting Predictability in a Chaotic Marketplace

10.1086/209355

10.1111/1540-5915.02407

Garcia RosannaandRummel Paul(2004). Netlogo Exploration/Exploitation Agent‐Based Model. Available at:http://igimresearch.cba.neu.edu/netlogo/jpim(accessed June 23 2005).

Garcia Rosanna Rummel PaulandCalantone Roger(2004). The Exploration versus Exploitation Dilemma in Innovation: A Complex Adaptive Systems Approach. IGIM Working Paper Northeastern University.

Garcia Rosanna Zhao MengandCalantone Roger(2003). The Premature Release of Next Generation Technologically‐Advancing Products. Paper presented at: INFORMS 25th Marketing Science Conference College Park MD June 12–15.

Gilbert Nigel, 2001, Innovation Networks—A Simulation Approach, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 4, 8

Gladwell Malcolm, 2000, The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference

10.1509/jmkg.66.2.1.18472

10.1086/225469

10.1016/0167-2681(86)90023-5

Guardiola X., 2002, Modelling Diffusion of Innovations in a Social Network, Econophysics Forum

10.1086/226424

Holland John H., 1975, Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems

Holland John, 1995, Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity

Holland John, 1998, Emergence: From Chaos to Order, 10.1093/oso/9780198504092.001.0001

Iyer Karthik N.S., 2002, Learning in Strategic Alliances, Academy of Marketing Science Review, 10

10.1007/s00191-002-0120-1

Lairson Thomas D.(2003). Professor of international business and professor of political science Rollins College. Personal correspondence.

10.1016/0167-2681(81)90012-3

Malerba Franco, 1992, Technology and the Wealth of Nations, 247

Nelson Richard R., 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change

10.1016/S0378-8733(02)00050-3

Parunak H. Van Dyke Savit RobertandRiolo Rick(1998). Agent‐Based Modeling vs. Equation Based Modeling: A Case Study and Users Guide. Paper presented at:Proceedings of Multi‐agent Systems and Agent Based Simulation (MABS'98). 10‐25(LNAI 1534):1–16.

10.2307/41165952

10.2307/2393988

Rauch Jonathan, 2002, Seeing around Corners, Atlantic Monthly, 298, 35

10.1111/1540-5885.1850285

Rosen Emmanuel, 2002, The Anatomy of Buzz: How to Create Word of Mouth Marketing

Self‐Organizing Innovation Network (SEIN)(2000). Newsletter No. 3 December 2000. Simulating Self‐Organization Innovation Network Projects. European Union. Available at:http://www.uni‐bielefeld.de/iwt/sein/(accessed June 23 2005).

SPSS Software(2003).Ed. 12. Chicago. SPSS Inc.

Sterman John D., 2000, Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World

10.1162/106454602753694765

Valente Thomas W., 1995, Network of Models of Diffusion of Innovation

Von Hippel Eric, 1988, The Sources of Innovation

10.1007/BF01298460

Watts Duncan J., 1998, Collective Dynamics of “Small‐World” Networks, Nature, 393, 440, 10.1038/30918

Wilensky U.(1999). NetLogo 2.0.2. Available at:http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo. Center for Connected Learning and Computer‐Based Modeling. Evanston IL: Northwestern University.

Young H. Peyton(1999). Diffusion in Social Networks. Working Paper No. 2. The Brookings Institution Center on Social and Economic Dynamics Washington DC.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Product Innovation Management

Tập 22 Số 5

380-398

Thông tin tác giả