User experience and clinical effectiveness with two wearable global positioning system devices in home dementia care

Alzheimer's and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions - Tập 4 - Trang 636-644 - 2018
Herlind Megges1,2,3, Silka Dawn Freiesleben1,2,3, Christina Rösch1,2,3, Nina Knoll4, Lauri Wessel5, Oliver Peters1,2,3
1Department of Psychiatry, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
2German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, Germany
3Memory Clinic and Dementia Prevention Center, Experimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC), Berlin, Germany
4Division Health Psychology, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
5Faculty 7: Business Studies and Economics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany

Tóm tắt

AbstractIntroductionThe user experience and clinical effectiveness with wearable global positioning system (GPS) devices for persons with dementia (PwDs) and caregivers (CGs) remain unclear although many are available.MethodsUsing a crossover design, 20 dyads tested two similar commercial GPS watches (products A and B) at home for 4 weeks each. Usability, product functions, design features and product satisfaction at home and the clinic were investigated. Caregiver burden and quality of life assessed clinical effectiveness.ResultsThe final 17 dyads rated the usability, telephone function, overall design features, font, buttons, and battery life of B significantly better than A. PwDs rated the overall design features and buttons of A significantly better than CGs. Product satisfaction with both products was significantly lower at home. Clinical effectiveness was not found.DiscussionUser experience can be improved by optimizing specific product details. This might translate to clinical effectiveness. Social desirability bias may explain different product satisfaction ratings.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Van der Roest H.G., 2017, Assistive technology for memory support in dementia, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 6, 1 Samus Q.M., 2017, Home is where the future is: The BrightFocus Foundation consensus panel on dementia care, Alzheimers Dement, 14, 104, 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.10.006 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1166(199808)13:8<556::AID-GPS834>3.0.CO;2-6 10.1093/ageing/afh084 Oderud T., 2015, Persons with dementia and their caregivers using GPS, Stud Health Technol Inform, 217, 212 10.1080/13607863.2011.596810 10.1017/S1041610209008448 Megges H., 2017, Technology for home dementia care: A prototype locating system put to the test, Alzheimers Dement, 3, 332, 10.1016/j.trci.2017.04.004 Olsson A., 2014, Effects of tracking technology on daily life of persons with dementia: Three experimental single‐case studies, Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen, 30, 29, 10.1177/1533317514531441 Wan L., 2014, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 3987, 10.1145/2556288.2557307 Williamson B., 2017, Tracking down a solution: exploring the acceptability and value of wearable GPS devices for older persons, individuals with a disability and their support persons, Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol, 12, 822, 10.1080/17483107.2016.1272140 10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.034 10.3233/JAD-161037 10.1177/0008417418777530 10.4276/030802210X12706313443901 A.Sauer.10 Lifesaving Location Devices for Dementia Patients US: alzheimers.net.2018 Available at:https://www.alzheimers.net/8‐8‐14‐location‐devices‐dementia/. Accessed September 14 2018. Dale Ø., 2010, International conference on computers for handicapped persons, 300 Liu L., 2017, Acceptance of global positioning system (GPS) technology among dementia clients and family caregivers, J Technol Hum Serv, 35, 99, 10.1080/15228835.2016.1266724 10.2196/rehab.6376 Topfer L.A., 2016, GPS locator devices for people with dementia. CADTH issues in emerging health technologies, 1 Livingston G., 2017, Dementia prevention, intervention, and care, Lancet, 390, 1, 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31363-6 Brims L., 2018, Effectiveness of assistive technology in improving the safety of people with dementia: a systematic review and meta‐analysis, Aging Ment Health, 1 ISO9241‐210, 2010, Ergonomics of human‐system interaction—Part 210: human‐centred design for interactive systems Forlizzi J., 2000, Proceedings of the 3rd conference on designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, 419, 10.1145/347642.347800 Law E., 2008, Towards a shared definition of user experience. Extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, 2395, 10.1145/1358628.1358693 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 Hornbæk K., 2017, Technology acceptance and user experience: A review of the experiential component in HCI, ACM Trans Comput‐Hum Interact, 24, 33, 10.1145/3127358 10.1007/1-4020-2967-5_4 Natesan D., 2016, Cognitive bias in usability testing, Proc Int Symp Hum Factors Ergon Healthc, 5, 86 Edwards A.L., 1958, The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research, Acad Med, 33, 610 Haberstroh J., 2011, Kommunikation bei Demenz: TANDEM Trainings manual, 10.1007/978-3-642-16843-7 Feil N., 2012, The Validation Breakthrough: Simple Techniques for Communicating With People With Alzheimer's and Other Dementias 10.1093/geront/41.5.652 10.1026/0012-1924.53.2.83 Karrer K., 2009, Technikaffinität erfassen–der Fragebogen TA‐EG [Assessment of technological affinity‐the TA‐EG], Mensch Mittelpunkt Technischer Systeme, 8, 196 Prümper J., 1997, Software‐Ergonomie '97, 253, 10.1007/978-3-322-86782-7_21 Prümper J., 1993, Software‐evaluation based upon ISO 9241 Part 10, 255 ISO9241‐110, 2006, Ergonomics of human‐system interaction—Part 110: dialogue principles [Revision of ISO 9241‐10:1996 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)—Part 10: dialogue principles] Sarodnick F., 2006, Methoden der Usability Evaluation: Wissenschaftliche Grundlagen und praktische Anwendung [Methods of usability assessment: scientific foundations and practical application] Kenny D.A., 2006, The analysis of dyadic data Field A., 2009, Discovering statistics using SPSS 10.1108/JAT-07-2014-0017 10.1111/hsc.12590 10.1186/1471-2318-13-11 10.1080/01634372.2018.1433738 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.04.012 10.3233/WOR-2012-0568-3093 10.3233/TAD-2002-14304 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02781.x Association As, 2015, Behaviors: How to Respond When Dementia Causes Unpredictable Behaviors, 1 Garrett J.J., 2010, The elements of User Experience: User‐Centered Design for the Web and Beyond Patomella A.‐H., 2018, Technology use to improve everyday occupations in older persons with mild dementia or mild cognitive impairment: A scoping review, Br J Occup Ther, 0
Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Alzheimer's and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions

Tập 4

636-644

Thông tin tác giả