Use of amniotic membrane transplantation in the treatment of venous leg ulcers

Wound Repair and Regeneration - Tập 15 Số 4 - Trang 459-464 - 2007
I. Mermet1, Nathalie Pottier2, Jean‐Marie Sainthillier3, Caroline Malugani2, Sandrive Cairey‐Remonnay1, Stéphane Maddens2,4, Didier Riethmuller5,6, Pierre Tiberghien2,4, Philippe Humbert3,1, F. Aubin5,1
1Université de Franche Comté, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital and Medical School,
2Cell and Tissue Engineering Department, Etablissement Français du Sang de Bourgogne-Franche-Comté,
3EA 3183, Université de Franche Comté, IFR 133,
4Inserm U645, Université de Franche-Comté, Etablissement Français du Sang, IFR133,
5EA 3181, Université de Franche-Comté, IFR 133, Besançon, France
6Université de Franche Comté, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital and Medical School, and

Tóm tắt

ABSTRACTAmniotic membrane (AM), the most internal placental membrane, has unique properties including antiadhesive effects, bacteriostatic, wound protection and pain‐reduction properties, as well as epithelialization initialization capacities. Furthermore, AM is widely available and less costly than other bioengineered skin substitutes. In a prospective pilot study, we evaluated the safety, feasibility, and the effects on healing of AM graft in 15 patients with chronic venous leg ulcers. AM grafts were prepared from placentas harvested during cesarean section. All grafted AM had adhered to the wound bed 7 days after being applied with a 100% engraftment rate. The percentage of granulation tissue increased significantly (from 17% on day 0 to 69% on day 14, p<0.0001), along with a significant decrease of fibrinous slough (from 36% at day 0 to 16% at day 14, p<0.001). A significant clinical response occurred in 12 patients (80%) including complete healing (20%) in three during the 3‐month follow‐up period. The ulcer surface area decreased significantly from a mean value (±standard deviation) of 4.59±2.49 cm2 at baseline to 2.91±2.01 cm2 on day 30 (p<0.001). All patients experienced a significant reduction of ulcer‐related pain rapidly after AM transplantation. No adverse events were recorded. AM transplantation seems to function as a safe substrate, promoting proper epithelialization while suppressing excessive fibrosis. Further advantages of biotherapy with AM are its easy and low‐cost production, and that it can be applied as an ambulatory treatment without immobilization. AM transplantation may thus be considered to be an alternative method for treating chronic leg ulcers.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1097/01.prs.0000222531.84704.94

Jones JE, 2005, Skin grafting for venous leg ulcers, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 1, CD001737

10.1111/j.1582-4934.2005.tb00491.x

10.1097/01.TP.0000144606.84234.49

10.1097/01.icu.0000172827.31985.3a

10.1136/bjo.83.4.399

10.1136/bjo.83.6.748

10.1586/17434440.2.2.153

Haute Autorité de Santé Paris France. Prise en charge de l'ulcère de jambe à prédominance veineuse hors pansement. Available athttp://www.has‐sante.frAccessed on November 30 2006.

10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01364.x

Ventafridda V, 1985, WHO guidelines for the use of analgesics in cancer pain, Int J Tissue React, 7, 93

10.1023/B:CATB.0000034077.05000.29

Phillips TJ, 1990, Cultured epidermal grafts in the treatment of leg ulcers, Adv Dermatol, 5, 33

10.1016/S0167-7799(98)01196-2

10.1067/mjd.2003.69

10.1046/j.1524-475X.2003.11403.x

Martinez Pardo ME, 1999, Clinical application of amniotic membranes on a patient with epidermolysis bullosa, Ann Transplant, 4, 68

10.1001/archderm.138.8.1079

10.1177/1534734605282999

Kubo M, 2001, Immunogenicity of human amniotic membrane in experimental xenotransplantation, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 42, 1539