Unstructured citizen science data fail to detect long‐term population declines of common birds in Denmark
Tóm tắt
Long‐term monitoring of biodiversity is necessary to identify population declines and to develop conservation management. Because long‐term monitoring is labour‐intensive, resources to implement robust monitoring programmes are lacking in many countries. The increasing availability of citizen science data in online public databases can potentially fill gaps in structured monitoring programmes, but only if trends estimated from unstructured citizen science data match those estimated from structured monitoring programmes. We therefore aimed to assess the correlation between trends estimated from structured and unstructured data.
Denmark.
We compared population trends for 103 bird species estimated over 28 years from a structured monitoring programme and from unstructured citizen science data to assess whether trends estimated from the two data sources were correlated.
Trends estimated from the two data sources were generally positively correlated, but less than half the population declines identified from the structured monitoring data were recovered from the unstructured citizen science data. The mismatch persisted when we reduced the structured monitoring data from count data to occurrence data to mimic the information content of unstructured citizen science data and when we filtered the unstructured data to reduce the number of incomplete lists reported. Mismatching trends were especially prevalent for the most common species. Worryingly, more than half the species showing significant declines in the structured monitoring showed significant positive trends in the citizen science data.
We caution that unstructured citizen science databases cannot replace structured monitoring data because the former are less sensitive to population changes. Thus, unstructured data may not fulfil one of the most critical functions of structured monitoring programmes, namely to act as an early warning system that detects population declines.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Balmer D., 2014, Bird Atlas 2007–11: the breeding and wintering birds of Britain and Ireland
BirdLife International, 2004, Birds in Europe: population estimates, trends and conservation status
Boulesteix A.L. Janitza S. Kruppa J.&König I.R.(2012)Overview of random forest methodology and practical guidance with emphasis on computational biology and bioinformatics. Technical Report 129 pp.1–31. Department of Statistics University of Munich Munich Germany.
Glutz von Blotzheim U.N., 1985, Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas
Heldbjerg H. Brandtberg N.&Jørgensen M.F.(2014)Overvågning af de almindelige fuglearter i Danmark 1975‐2013. Årsrapport for Punkttællingsprogrammet. Dansk Ornitologisk Forening Copenhagen.
Hothorn T. Hornik K.&Zeileis A.(2006)party: A Laboratory for Recursive Part(y)itioning. Available at:http://CRAN.R-project.org/(accessed 13 December 2014).
Kéry M., 2012, Bayesian population analysis using WinBUGS: a hierarchical perspective
Nyegaard T., 2012, DOFbasen 10 years, Bird Census News, 25, 13
Plummer M.(2012)JAGS version 3.3.0. Available at:http://sourceforge.net/projects/mcmc-jags/files/Manuals/(accessed 12 August 2013).
R Development Core Team, 2013, R: a language and environment for statistical computing
Snow D., 1998, The birds of the western palearctic: concise edition
Su Y.‐S.&Yajima M.(2012)R2jags: A package for running jags from R. version 0.03‐08. Available at:http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=R2jags(accessed 12 August 2013).
Tucker G.M., 1997, Habitats for birds in Europe: a conservation strategy for the wider environment