Unpacking mathematical-spatial relations: Problem-solving in static and interactive tasks

Attard, C. (2010). Students’ experiences of mathematics during the transition from primary to secondary school. In L. Sparrow, B. Kissane, & C. Hurst (Eds.), Shaping the future of mathematics education: Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. MERGA: Fremantle. Attard, C. (2013). “If I had to pick any subject, it wouldn’t be maths”: foundations for engagement with mathematics during the middle years. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25, 569–587. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA; n.d.). Australian curriculum: mathematics. Retrieved from: https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/mathematics/ Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority ACARA. (2016). NAPLAN: numeracy. Retrieved from: https://www.nap.edu.au/naplan/numeracy. Bruce, C. D., & Hawes, Z. (2015). The role of 2D and 3D mental rotation in mathematics for young children: what is it? Why does it matter? And what can we do about it? ZDM: Mathematics Education, 47(3), 331–343. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press. Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R. L., & Pezaris, E. (2001). Spatial-mechanical reasoning skills versus mathematics self-confidence as mediators of gender differences on mathematics subtests using cross-national gender-based items. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(1), 28–57. Cheng, Y.-L., & Mix, K. S. (2014). Spatial training improves children’s mathematics ability. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15(1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2012.725186. Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 420–464). New York: Macmillan. Davis & Spatial Reasoning Group. (2015). Spatial reasoning in the early years: principles, assertions, and speculations. New York: Routledge. Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H. H., & Dermen, D. (1976). Kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton: Educational Testing Service. Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Beilock, S. L., & Levine, S. C. (2012). The relation between spatial skill and early number knowledge: the role of the linear number line. Developmental Psychology, 48(5), 1229–1241. Harris, D., & Lowrie, T. (2018). The distinction between mathematics and spatial reasoning in assessment: Do STEM educators and cognitive psychologists agree? In Hunter, J., Perger, P., & Darragh, L. (Eds.). Making waves, opening spaces (Proceedings of the 41st annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia) pp. 376–383. Auckland: MERGA. Hegarty, M., & Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Types of visual–spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 684–689. Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2004). A dissociation between mental rotation and perspective-taking spatial abilities. Intelligence, 32, 175–191. Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2005). Individual differences in spatial abilities. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), Handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 121–169). New York: Cambridge University Press. Howard, P., Perry, B., & Tracey, D. (1997). Mathematics and manipulatives: comparing primary and secondary mathematics teachers’ views. Paper presented at Australian Association for Research in Education, Brisbane, Australia. Retrieved February 18, 2019 from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED461502.pdf. Kröhne, U., & Martens, T. (2011). Computer-based competence tests in the national educational panel study: the challenge of mode effects. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 14, 169–186. Lean, G., & Clements, M. A. (1981). Spatial ability, visual imagery and mathematical performance. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 267–299. Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 138–151. Logan, T. (2015). The influence of test mode and visuospatial ability on mathematics assessment performance. Mathematics Education Research Journal 27(4), 423–441. Logan, T., & Lowrie, T. (2017). Gender perspectives on spatial tasks in a national assessment: A secondary data analysis. Research in Mathematics Education, 19(2), 199–216. Lowrie, T. (2012). Visual and spatial reasoning: The changing form of mathematics representation and communication. In B. Kaur & T. L. Toh (Eds.), Communication, reasoning & connections: Yearbook 2011, Association of Mathematics Educators. Singapore. Lowrie, T., & Kay, R. (2001). Relationship between visual and nonvisual solution methods and difficulty in elementary mathematics. Journal of Educational Research, 94(4), 248–255. Lowrie, T., & Logan, T. (2018). The interaction between spatial reasoning constructs and mathematics understandings in elementary classrooms. In K. S. Mix & M. T. Battista (Eds.), Visualizing Mathematics: The role of spatial reasoning in mathematical thought (pp. 253–276). Switzerland: Springer. Lowrie, T., Diezmann, C. M., & Logan, T. (2012). A framework for mathematics graphical tasks: The influence of the graphic element on student sense making. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 24(2), 169–187. Lowrie, T., Logan, T., & Ramful, A. (2017). Visuospatial training improves elementary students’ mathematics performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology 87(2), 170–186. Mix, K. S. (2019). Why are spatial skill and mathematics related? Child Development Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12323. Mix, K. S., & Cheng, Y.-L. (2012). The relation between space and math: developmental and educational implications. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 42, 197–243. Mix, K. S., Levine, S. C., Cheng, Y., Young, C., Hambrick, D. Z., Ping, R., & Konstantopoulos, S. (2016). Separate but correlated: the latent structure of space and mathematics across development. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(9), 1206–1227. Mulligan, J. (2015). Looking within and beyond the geometry curriculum: connecting spatial reasoning to mathematics learning. ZDM: Mathematics Education, 47(3), 511–517. Mulligan, J., & Mitchelmore, M. (2009). Awareness of pattern and structure in early mathematical development. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(2), 33–49. Newcombe, N. S. (2010). Picture this: increasing math and science learning by improving spatial thinking. American Educator, 34(2), 29–43. Newcombe, N. S. (2017). Harnessing spatial thinking to support STEM learning. OECD Education Working Paper, No. 161, OECD Publishing, Paris. Newcombe, N. S. (2018). Part II Commentary 3: linking spatial and mathematical thinking: the search for mechanism. In K. S. Mix & M. T. Battista (Eds.), Visualizing mathematics: the role of spatial reasoning in mathematical thought (pp. 355–360). Switzerland: Springer. Papic, M. M., Mulligan, J. T., & Mitchelmore, M. C. (2011). Assessing the development of preschoolers’ mathematical patterning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(3), 237–268. Pirie, S. E. B., & Kieren, T. E. (1994). Growth in mathematical understanding: how can we characterise it and how can we represent it? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26(2/3), 165–190. Ramful, A., Lowrie T., & Logan, T. (2017). Measurement of spatial ability: Construction and validation of the spatial reasoning instrument for middle school students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(7), 709–727. Shah, P., Feedman, E. G., & Vekiri, I. (2005). The comprehension of quantitative information in graphical displays. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 426–476). New York: Cambridge University Press. Sinclair, N., & Bruce, C. D. (2015). New opportunities in geometry education at the primary school. ZDM: Mathematics Education, 47(3), 319–329. Sorby, S., Casey, B., Veurink, N., & Dulaney, A. (2013). The role of spatial training in improving spatial and calculus performance in engineering students. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 20–29. Sorby, S., Veurink, N., & Streiner, S. (2018). Does spatial skills instruction improve STEM outcomes? The answer is ‘yes’. Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 209–222. Tall, D. (2000). Cognitive development in advanced mathematics using technology. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12(3), 196–218. Threlfall, J., Pool, P., Homer, M., & Swinnerton, B. (2007). Implicit aspects of paper and pencil mathematics assessment that come to light through the use of the computer. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(3), 335–348. Uttal, D. H., & Cohen, C. A. (2012). Spatial thinking and STEM education: when, why and how. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 57, 147–181. Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 817–835. Warren, E. (2005). Young children’s ability to generalise the pattern rule for growing patterns. In H. Chick & J. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education Vol. 4 (pp. 305–312). Melbourne: Program Committee. Wilkie, K. J. (2016). Students’ use of variables and multiple representations in generalizing functional relationships prior to secondary school. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93, 333–361. Zazkis, R., Dubinsky, E., & Dautermann, J. (1996). Coordinating visual and analytic strategies: a study of students’ understanding of the group D4. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 435–457.