Uneven Growth: A Framework for Research in Development Economics

Journal of Economic Perspectives - Tập 24 Số 3 - Trang 45-60 - 2010
Debraj Ray1,2
1Professor of Economics, New York University, New York, New
2is Julius Silver Professor of Economics, New York University, New York, New York.

Tóm tắt

The textbook paradigm of economywide development rests on the premise of “balanced growth”: that is, on the presumption that all sectors will grow in unison over time as a country gets richer. Of course, we would all agree that balanced growth is an abstraction. In many developing countries, economic growth has been fundamentally uneven. The question really is not whether growth is balanced—it isn't—but whether the abstraction is a useful one. For many important development questions, I believe the answer is no. This is why I would like to take the reality of “uneven growth” seriously and use it as an organizing device for a research program. I divide my research agenda into roughly two parts: the sources and nature of uneven growth, and the reactions to uneven growth—how forces are set in motion to restore balance or perhaps even to thwart the growth process. To help us think about the effects of uneven growth, I present a version of Albert Hirschmann's tunnel parable: You're in a multi-lane tunnel, all lanes in the same direction, and you're caught in a serious traffic jam. After a while, the cars in the other lane begin to move. Do you feel better or worse? At first, movement in the other lane may seem like a good sign: you hope that your turn to move will come soon, and indeed that might happen. However, if the other lane keeps whizzing by, with no gaps to enter and with no change on your lane, your reactions may well become quite negative. Unevenness without corresponding redistribution can be tolerated or even welcomed if it raises expectations everywhere, but it will be tolerated for only so long. Thus, uneven growth will set forces in motion to restore a greater degree of balance, even (in some cases) actions that may thwart the growth process itself.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1257/aer.91.5.1369

10.1162/003355302320935025

10.2307/2951741

10.1016/S0176-2680(02)00080-0

10.1016/0304-3878(91)90067-6

10.1086/261876

10.1086/260831

10.1086/298118

10.1086/262008

10.1257/jel.48.1.3

10.1086/321015

10.1093/oep/50.4.563

10.1093/oep/gpf064

10.1162/qjec.122.2.601

10.2307/2951734

10.1257/000282806776157533

10.1257/aer.98.5.2185

10.1017/S0003055403000534

10.1162/qjec.2007.122.4.1561

10.1111/j.1467-937X.2006.00403.x

10.2307/2297811

10.1016/S0304-3878(02)00059-7

10.1086/595561

10.1016/j.jmoneco.2006.04.002

10.2307/1882024

10.1111/1467-937X.00193

Kuznets Simon, 1957, Economic Development and Cultural Change, supplement to, 5, 3

10.1111/j.1467-9957.1954.tb00021.x

10.1016/0304-3878(93)90084-Z

10.2307/1912506

10.1016/0022-0531(82)90017-5

10.1023/A:1011326523470

Markusen James R, 1986, American Economic Review, 76, 1002

10.1086/317684

10.1086/341873

10.1086/421174

10.1257/0002828054201468

10.1111/1467-937X.00248

10.1257/aer.96.4.1225

Ranis Gustav, 1961, American Economic Review, 51, 533

Rao V. K. R. V., 1952, Indian Economic Review, 1, 55

10.1007/PL00011021

10.2307/2226317

10.1257/jep.14.3.217

10.2307/1884513

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Economic Perspectives

Tập 24 Số 3

45-60

Thông tin tác giả