Understanding shoppers' expectations of online grocery retailing

Emerald - Tập 34 Số 7 - Trang 529-540 - 2006
MurielWilson‐Jeanselme1, JonathanReynolds1
1Saïd Business School & Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Tóm tắt

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to analyse the online preference structures of consumers.

Design/methodology/approach

Novel choice‐based conjoint experiments are used and are administered online. A select group of high net worth online grocery shoppers are examined. Both qualitative and quantitative procedures are used to determine the most frequently cited attributes affecting online patronage.

Findings

Whilst there is no single attribute on which a retailer could develop a competitive edge, a significant market advantage can be gained by being simultaneously “best in class” on the top four attributes.

Practical implications

This research approach has significant practical application to a wide range of strategic marketing questions.

Originality/value

These findings give focus to the management task facing marketing executives in the UK multichannel grocery market. How these findings might be used within a marketing plan is illustrated.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Baker, W.L., Lin, E., Marn, M.V. and Zawada, C.C. (2001), “Getting prices right on the web”, The McKinsey Quarterly, Vol. 2 No. 2, Special edition, pp. 54‐63.

Brynjolfsson, E. and Smith, M.D. (2000), “Frictionless commerce? A comparison of internet and conventional retailers”, Management Science, Vol. 46 No. 4, pp. 563‐85.

Burt, S. and Sparks, L. (2003), “E‐commerce and the retail process: a review”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 10 No. 5, p. 275.

Evans, P.B. and Wurster, T.S. (1997), “Strategy and the new economics of information”, Harvard Business Review, September‐October, pp. 71‐82.

Ghose, S. and Dou, W. (1998), “Interactive functions and their impacts on the appeal of internet presence sites”, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 38 No. 2, p. 29.

Grewal, D., Iyer, G.R. and Levy, M. (2004), “Internet retailing: enablers, limiters and market consequences”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 57, pp. 703‐13.

Grewal, D., Levy, M. and Marshall, G.W. (2002), “Personal selling in retail settings: How does the internet and related technologies enable and limit successful selling?”, Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 18, pp. 301‐16.

Hair, J.F., Tatham, R., Anderson, R. and Black, W. (1998), Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Hoffman, L.D. and Novak, T.P. (1996), “Marketing in hypermedia computer‐mediated environments: conceptual foundations”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 60, pp. 50‐68.

Interactive Media in Retail Group (2006), “E‐christmas: online retail results”, press release, 20 January, available at: www.imrg.org.

Keen, C., Wetzels, M., De Ruyter, K. and Feinberg, R. (2004), “E‐tailers versus retailers: which factors determine consumer preferences”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 57 No. 7, pp. 685‐95, 11p.

Reynolds, J. (2003), “Prospects for electronic commerce”, in Reynolds, J. and Cuthbertson, C. (Eds), Retail Strategy: The View from the Bridge, Butterworth‐Heinemann, Oxford.

Sinha, I. (2000), “Cost transparency: the net's real threat to prices and brands”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 78 No. 2, pp. 43‐8.

Wilson‐Jeanselme, M. (2001), “Grocery retailing on the internet: the leaky bucket theory”, The European Retail Digest, No. 30, pp. 9‐12.

Wilson‐Jeanselme, M. and Reynolds, J. (2005), “Competing for the online grocery customer: the UK experience”, in Kornum, N. and Bjerre, M. (Eds), Grocery E‐Commerce. Consumer Behaviour and Business Strategies, Edward Elgar, Abingdon.

Hill, T. (2000), Manufacturing Strategy: Texts and Cases, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY.