Understanding how facilitators adapt to needs of STEM faculty in online learning communities: a case study
Tóm tắt
Faculty Learning Communities (FLCs) and Faculty Online Learning Communities (FOLCs) are ways to support STEM faculty implementing research-based curricula. In these communities, faculty facilitators take on the role of sharing expertise and promoting discussion. However, as members gain more experience, their needs change from addressing logistical to pedagogical issues. Hence, facilitators need to change their practices in response. However, there is little research on the mechanisms of faculty facilitator change. In this article, we provide a case study of a specific STEM FOLC facilitator and demonstrate the usefulness of a teacher change model to investigate facilitator change. Guided by our adaptation of the Interconnected Model of Professional Growth (IMPG), we conducted interviews with FOLC facilitators, and selected a case facilitator who reported changes in facilitation goals and strategies over time. The model helped us identify specific areas of change and potential mechanisms for these changes. Using themes of change identified in the case facilitator interview, we developed coding schemes to analyze his FOLC meetings over a 2-year period. We found empirical evidence from multiple data sources, including FOLC meetings and facilitator reflections, that supported the change themes, including: changing his role as an “expert” by sharing his own expertise less and drawing on others’ expertise more frequently, changing his response to members’ comments by jumping in to answer less frequently and withholding his own responses more often to encourage member sharing, and a change in group discussions towards less logistical and more pedagogical conversations. Our findings suggest that the IMPG can be fruitfully adapted to study facilitator change. A diagrammatic representation of the IMPG provides a description the types of change the case facilitator experienced and the factors that supported those changes. We discuss how the methodology used to analyze facilitator actions in FOLC group meetings may be useful to study other types of professional growth. Finally, because our analytical model allowed us to identify mechanisms of facilitator change, we describe the implications and provide suggestions to support facilitators in other faculty community groups.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Allen, D., & Blythe, T. (2018). Aesthetics of facilitation: Cultivating teacher leadership. International Journal of Teacher Leadership, 9(2), 48–68.
Anderson, S. E. (1997). Understanding teacher change: Revisiting the concerns based adoption model. Curriculum Inquiry, 27(3), 331–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/0362-6784.00057
Andrews-Larson, C., Wilson, J., & Larbi-Cherif, A. (2017). Instructional improvement and teachers’ collaborative conversations: The role of focus and facilitation. Teachers College Record, 119(2), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811711900201
Borko H., Jacobs J., Seago N., & Mangram C. (2014). Facilitating video-based professional development: Planning and orchestrating productive discussions. In Y. Li, E. Silver, & S. Li (Eds.), Transforming mathematics instruction: Advances in mathematics education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04993-9_16.
Borko, H., Koellner, K., Jacobs, J., & Seago, N. (2011). Using video representations of teaching in practice-based professional development programs. ZDM, 43(1), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-010-0302-5
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brody, D. L., & Hadar, L. L. (2016). The role of the facilitator in professional development communities for teacher educators. AERA Online Paper Repository. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
Brown, B. D., Horn, R. S., & King, G. (2018). The effective implementation of professional learning communities. Alabama Journal of Educational Leadership, 5, 53–59. https://sites.google.com/site/aapelorg/home.
Clarke, D., & Peter, A. (1993). Modelling teacher change. In B. Atweh, C. Kanes, M. Carss, & G. Booker (Eds.), Contexts in mathematics education: Proceedings of the 16th annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia (pp. 167–175). Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA). https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2938175.
Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7
Corrales, A., Goldberg, F., Price, E., & Turpen, C. (2020). Faculty persistence with research based instructional strategies: A case study of participation in a faculty online learning community. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(21), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00221-8
Cox, M. D. (2004). Introduction to faculty learning communities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2004(97), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.129
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. USA: Sage.
Dancy, M., Lau, A. C., Rundquist, A., & Henderson, C. (2019). Faculty online learning communities: A model for sustained teaching transformation. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020147.
Elliott, E. R., Reason, R. D., Coffman, C. R., Gangloff, E. J., Raker, J. R., Powell-Coffman, J. A., & Ogilvie, C. A. (2016). Improved student learning through a faculty learning community: How faculty collaboration transformed a large-enrollment course from lecture to student centered. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-07-0112
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Goldberg, F. (2015). Next generation PET: Preparing elementary teachers for the NGSS. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Physics Teachers, San Diego, CA.
Goldberg, F., Otero, V., & Robinson, S. (2010). Design principles for effective physics instruction: A case from physics and everyday thinking. American Journal of Physics, 78(12), 1265–1277. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3480026
Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015005005
Hands, C., Guzar, K., & Rodrigue, A. (2015). The art and science of leadership in learning environments: Facilitating a professional learning community across districts. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 61(2), 226–242.
Henderson, C., Cole, R., Froyd, J., Friedrichsen, D. G., Khatri, R., & Stanford, C. (2015). Designing educational innovations for sustained adoption: A how-to guide for education developers who want to increase the impact of their work. Increase the Impact.
Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. H. (2007). Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 3(2), 020102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020102
Henderson, C., Dancy, M., & Niewiadomska-Bugaj, M. (2012). Use of research-based instructional strategies in introductory physics: Where do faculty leave the innovation-decision process? Physical Review Special Topics: Physics Education Research, 8(2), 020104. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020104
Henderson, C., Finkelstein, N., & Beach, A. (2010). Beyond dissemination in college science teaching: An introduction to four core change strategies. Journal of College Science Teaching, 39(5), 18–25.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2006). Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1004
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2008). Facilitating collaborative knowledge building. Cognition and Instruction, 26(1), 48–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000701798495
Horn, I. S., Garner, B., Kane, B. D., & Brasel, J. (2017). A taxonomy of instructional learning opportunities in teachers’ workgroup conversations. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116676315
Horn, I. S., & Little, J. W. (2010). Attending to problems of practice: Routines and resources for professional learning in teachers’ workplace interactions. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345158
Jiang, H., Wang, K., Wang, X., et al. (2021). Understanding a STEM teacher’s emotions and professional identities: A three-year longitudinal case study. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00309-9
Lau, A. C., Dancy, M. H., Henderson, C. R., & Rundquist, A. (2018). Describing and facilitating productive teaching talk in a faculty online learning community. In A. Traxler, Y. Cao, & S. Wolf (Eds.), Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2018.pr.Lau.
Lau, A. C., Martin, M., Corrales, A., Turpen, C., Goldberg, F., & Price, E. (2021). The Taxonomy of Opportunities to Learn (TxOTL): a tool for understanding the learning potential and substance of interactions in faculty (online) learning community meetings. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00301-3
Ortquist-Ahrens, L., & Torosyan, R. (2009). The role of the facilitator in faculty learning communities: Paving the way for growth, productivity, and collegiality. Learning Communities Journal, 1(1), 1–34.
Paolini, A. (2015). Enhancing teaching effectiveness and student learning outcomes. Journal of Effective Teaching, 15(1), 20–33.
Patton, K., Parker, M., & Pratt, E. (2013). Meaningful learning in professional development: Teaching without telling. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 32(4), 441–459. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.32.4.441
Perry, E., & Boylan, M. (2014). Extending the interconnected model of teacher professional growth to analyse professional development facilitators' learning. In Paper presented at the Re-thinking Models of Professional Learning Conference, Aston University, Birmingham, England. http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/14874.
Perry, E., & Boylan, M. (2018). Developing the developers: Supporting and researching the learning of professional development facilitators. Professional Development in Education, 44(2), 254–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2017.1287767
Petrone, M. C., & Ortquist-Ahrens, L. (2004). Facilitating faculty learning communities: A compact guide to creating change and inspiring community. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2004(97), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.133
Price, E., Lau, A. C., Goldberg, F., Turpen, C., Smith, P. S., Dancy, M., & Robinson, S. (2021). Analyzing a faculty online learning community as a mechanism for supporting faculty implementation of a guided-inquiry curriculum. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00268-7
Rundquist, A., Corbo, J., Chasteen, S., Martinuk, M., Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. (2015). Faculty Online Learning Communities to support physics teaching. In A. Churukain, D. L. Jones, & L. Ding (Eds.), Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings (pp. 279–282). https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2015.pr.065
Sandell, K. L., Wigley, K., & Kovalchick, A. (2004). Developing facilitators for faculty learning communities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2004(97), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.132
Schwarts, G. (2020). Facilitating a collaborative professional development for the first time. In H. Borko & D. Potari (Eds.), Teachers of mathematics working and learning in collaborative groups: Conference proceedings of the 25th ICMI study conference (pp. 540–548). Lisbon, Portugal.
Tekkumru-Kisa, M., & Stein, M. (2017). A framework for planning and facilitating video-based professional development. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(28). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0086-z
Tinnell, T. L., Ralston, P. A. S., Tretter, T. R., & Mills, M. E. (2019). Sustaining pedagogical change via faculty learning community. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0180-5
van der Want, A. C., & Meirink, J. A. (2020). Facilitator actions in teacher teams. Professional Development in Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1827008.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 2–3.
Zhang, M., Lundeberg, M., & Eberhardt, J. (2011). Strategic facilitation of problem-based discussion for teacher professional development. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(3), 342–394.