Under‐reporting of alcohol consumption in household surveys: a comparison of quantity–frequency, graduated–frequency and recent recall

Addiction - Tập 99 Số 8 - Trang 1024-1033 - 2004
Tim Stockwell1, Susan Donath2, Mark Cooper‐Stanbury2, Tanya Chikritzhs2, Paul Catalano2, Cid Mateo2
1National Drug Research Institute, Perth, Australia
21 National Drug Research Institute, Perth, 2 Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre Inc., Fitzroy, Victoria and 3 Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra, ACT, Australia

Tóm tắt

ABSTRACT

Aim  To compare alternative survey methods for estimating (a) levels of at risk alcohol consumption and (b) total volume of alcohol consumed per capita in comparison with estimates from sales data and to investigate reasons for under‐reporting.

Setting  The homes of respondents who were eligible and willing to participate.

Participants  A total of 21 674 Australians aged 14 years and older.

Design  A 2001 national household survey of drug use, experiences and attitudes with weights applied for age, sex, geographic location and day of week of interview.

Measures  Self‐completion questionnaire using quantity–frequency (QF) and graduated–frequency (GF) methods plus two questions about consumption ‘yesterday’: one in standard drinks, another with empirically based estimates of drink size and strength.

Results  The highest estimate of age 14 + per capita consumption of 7.00 l of alcohol derived from recall of consumption ‘yesterday’ or 76.8% of the official estimate. The lowest was QF with 49.8%. When amount consumed ‘yesterday’ was recalled in standard drinks this estimate was 5.27 l. GF questions yielded higher estimates than did QF questions both for total volume (5.25 versus 4.54 l) and also for the proportion of the population at risk of long‐term alcohol‐related harm (10.6%versus 8.1%). With the detailed ‘yesterday’ method 61% of all consumption was on high risk drinking days.

Conclusions  Questions about typical quantities of alcohol consumed can lead to underestimates, as do questions about drinking ‘standard drinks’ of alcohol. Recent recall methods encourage fuller reporting of volumes plus more accurate estimates of unrecorded consumption and the proportion of total alcohol consumption that places drinkers at risk of harm. However, they do not capture longer‐term drinking patterns. It is recommended that both recent recall and measures of longer‐term drinking patterns are included in national surveys.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW, 2002, 2001 National Drug Strategy Household Survey: First Results.

10.1080/09595239996815

10.1111/j.1530-0277.2002.tb02456.x

Catalano P., 2001, Trends in Per Capita Alcohol Consumption in Australia, 1990/91–1998/99

10.1111/j.1530-0277.2000.tb04556.x

Distilled Spirits Industry Council of Australia Inc. (DSICA) (2002) Attachments for DSICA Submission to the Senate Economics Legislation Committee. Melbourne Australia:DSICA.

10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.9321834.x

10.1111/j.1360-0443.1994.tb00957.x

Heale P., 2000, Patterns of Alcohol Consumption in Australia, 1998.

10.1016/S0899-3289(00)00042-0

10.1080/08897070109511443

Lang E., 1992, Drinking Settings, Alcohol‐Related Harm and Support for Prevention Policies Results of a Survey of Persons Residing in the Perth Metropolitan Area

10.1111/j.1360-0443.1994.tb03336.x

10.15288/jsa.1992.53.476

Mathers C., 1999, The Burden of Disease and Injury in Australia

National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC, 2001, Australian Alcohol Guidelines: Health Risks and Benefits

10.1093/ije/28.2.219

10.1111/j.1360-0443.1979.tb02425.x

10.15288/jsa.1993.54.590

10.5694/j.1326-5377.1990.tb125478.x

10.1080/09595239000185111

10.15288/jsa.2002.63.372

10.3109/16066359709005577

World Health Organization (WHO, 2000, International Guide for Monitoring Alcohol Consumption and Related Harm.