Two Worlds of Trust for Potential E-Commerce Users: Humans as Cognitive Misers

Information Systems Research - Tập 23 Số 4 - Trang 1246-1262 - 2012
Qianqian Ben Liu1, Dale L. Goodhue2
1Department of Information Systems, College of Business, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Sar
2MIS Department, Terry College of Business, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30606

Tóm tắt

In this paper we consider the impact of trust on a new visitor's intention to revisit a website, but instead of using the typical expectancy-value theories as our conceptual basis, we look at the issue from the perspective of cognitive complexity and “humans as cognitive misers.” Starting with the suggestion that it is cognitively taxing to distrust, we propose that in order to conserve on cognitive resources, once a new visitor has convinced him or herself that a website is “trustworthy enough,” that user will drop trustworthiness from their concerns and only consider other characteristics of the website (e.g., task-technology fit, aesthetic appeal, etc.) in determining their revisit intention. This leads to what we call a “trust tipping point” and two different worlds of trust. Above the tipping point revisit intention is constructed in one way, and below the trust tipping point it is constructed in a quite different way. This perspective results in very different recommendations for website designers as to the likely payoff from improving task-technology fit, aesthetic appeal, or trustworthiness, depending upon where their existing website stands relative to the trust tipping point. To test our hypotheses we used data from 314 student website users, and expanded a technique called piecewise regression (Neter et al. Applied Linear Statistical Models, 4th ed.) to allow us to analyze data as two different linear surfaces, joined at the tipping point. We found good support for our assertions that users operate differently above and below a trust tipping point.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Anderson DE, 1999, The Social Context of Nonverbal Behavior, 372

10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.133

10.2753/MIS0742-1222240400

10.2307/20721432

10.1109/HICSS.2005.598

10.1086/504121

10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.08.005

10.2307/20650308

10.1509/jmkr.38.2.269.18845

10.2307/20721433

10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.421

10.2979/esj.2003.2.2.7

10.2753/MIS0742-1222240411

10.2307/30036519

10.1109/TEM.2003.817277

10.2307/249689

Greene WH, 2003, Econometric Analysis, 5

10.1207/s15327051hci1904_2

10.2307/1914185

10.1287/isre.1080.0188

10.1080/07408170600897502

10.2307/2346413

10.1080/03637759909376468

10.2307/259288

10.1080/01449290500330448

10.2753/JEC1086-4415110302

10.1086/209155

10.1086/341573

Marsh L, 2001, Spline Regression Models

10.1145/1151454.1151527

10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81

10.1016/S0963-8687(02)00020-3

10.1145/1985347.1985353

10.1177/009365097024005005

10.7208/chicago/9780226527840.001.0001

10.1016/j.tics.2010.07.004

10.2307/2118330

Neter J, 1996, Applied Linear Statistical Models, 4

10.1287/isre.1040.0015

10.2307/25148783

10.1002/9780470998519.ch20

10.1002/smj.791

10.1287/orsc.14.1.5.12810

10.1177/009365092019003002

10.1890/02-0472

10.1126/science.185.4157.1124

10.2307/20721428

10.2307/30036540

10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.322