Tubeless Anaesthesia for Microlaryngeal Surgery

Anaesthesia and Intensive Care - Tập 18 Số 4 - Trang 497-503 - 1990
C. Aun1,2, I. T. Houghton3, H. Y. Sot4, C. Andrew van Hasselt5, T. E. Oh6
1Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong
2Senior Lecturer, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
3Consultant in Anaesthesia and Resuscitation, British Military Hospital, Hong Kong, Honorary Lecturer, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
4Medical Officer, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Honorary Tutor, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
5Senior Lecturer, Department of Surgery, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
6Professor and Chairman, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong.

Tóm tắt

An anaesthetic technique for laryngeal microsurgery is described and evaluated using intravenous propofol infusion and topical lignocaine with the patient breathing spontaneously without an endotracheal tube. Eighty adult patients divided into two groups according to their ASA status (Group A; 58 ASA I and II; Group B; 22 ASA III and IV) were analysed. Operating conditions were good in all but one case. Good anaesthesia was achieved in about 70% of patients. The requirement for propofol was less in Group B. Blood pressures decreased signifcantly following induction (P < 0.001) but returned towards the preoperative values after ten minutes in Group A patients whereas the recovery was slower in Group B. Apnoea occurred on induction in about 40% of patients overall. Paco2 showed a similar small increase in both groups. Oxygenation was adequate. The results show that propofol as an infusion in this simple tubeless technique is satisfactory. As the technique was considered potentially hazardous in those patients with upper airway obstruction, such patients were not included in this study.’

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1093/bja/59.12.1610

10.1213/00000539-198302000-00018

Wainwright A.C., 1987, Anaesthesia Review — 4:, 159

10.1177/000348947808700417

10.1111/j.1365-2044.1985.tb10662.x

10.1002/lsm.1900060312

10.1177/000348948709600107

10.1288/00005537-198711000-00015

10.1097/00007611-197304000-00015

10.1097/00000542-198109000-00029

Judelman H., 1979, S Afr Med J, 53, 698

Judelman H., 1974, S Afr Med J, 48, 462

10.1111/j.1365-2044.1987.tb03976.x

10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb04146.x

10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb09079.x

10.1001/archotol.1980.00790340047012

10.1111/j.1365-2044.1984.tb06425.x

10.1001/archotol.1979.00790210059013

10.1213/00000539-198112000-00008

Briggs L.P., 1985, Postgrad Med J, 61, 35, 10.1136/pgmj.61.711.35

10.1093/bja/59.12.1497

10.1111/j.1365-2044.1986.tb13271.x

10.1093/bja/55.2.105

10.1111/j.1365-2044.1984.tb08930.x

10.1111/j.1365-2044.1982.tb01713.x

10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb09065.x

Gejrot T., 1979, Illustrated handbook in local anaesthesia., 33

10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb09085.x

10.1007/BF00542199

10.1177/0310057X8801600403