Truncation of the distribution of ground-motion residuals
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abrahamson NA (2000a) State of the practice of seismic hazard evaluation. In: Proceedings of GeoEng 2000, Melbourne, 19–24 November, Vol. 1, 659–685
Abrahamson NA (2000b) Effects of rupture directivity on probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Seismic Zonation, Palm Springs, California, Vol. 1, 151–156
Abrahamson NA, Darragh RB (1985) The Morgan Hill earthquake of April 24, 1984 – The 1.29 g acceleration at Coyote Lake Dam: Due to directivity, a double event, or both? Earthq Spectra 1(3):445–455
Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ (1997) Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes. Seism Res Lett 68(1):94–127
Abrahamson NA, Silva W (2005) Datafiles of preliminary ground-motion model prepared for the PEER/NGA project, April 2005
Abrahamson NA, Silva W (2007) Abrahamson and Silva NGA ground motion relations for the geometric mean horizontal component of peak and spectral ground motion parameters. Version 1, June 2007. Available from http://peer.berkeley.edu/lifelines/repngamodels.html
Abrahamson NA, Youngs RR (1992) A stable algorithm for regression analysis using the random effects model. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88(1):505–510
Abrahamson NA, Birkhauser P, Koller M, Mayer-Rosa D, Smit P, Sprecher C, Tinic S, Graf R (2002) PEGASOS – a comprehensive probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for nuclear power plants in Switzerland. In: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, Paper No. 633.
Ambraseys NN, Douglas J, Sarma SK, Smit PM (2005) Equations for the estimation of strong ground motions from shallow crustal earthquakes using data from Europe and the Middle East: Horizontal peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration. Bull Earthq Eng 3(1):1–53
Ambraseys NN, Simpson KA, Bommer JJ (1996) Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25(4):371–400
Anderson JG, Brune JN (1999) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment without the ergodic assumption. Seismol Res Lett 70(1):19–28
Anooshehpoor A, Brune JN (1989) Foam rubber modeling of topographic and dam interaction effects at Pacoima Dam. Bull Seismol Soc Am 79(5):1347–1360
Barnett V, Lewis T (1994) Outliers in statistical data, 3rd edn. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, p 584
Barnett V, Roberts D (1993). The problem of outlier tests in sample surveys. Comm. in Statistics – Theory and Methods 22. [not seen; quoted in Barnett and Lewis (1994)]
Berge-Thierry C, Cotton F, Scotti O, Griot-Pommera D-A, Fukushima Y (2003) New empirical response spectral attenuation laws for moderate European earthquakes. J Earthq Eng 7(2):193–222
Bernreuter DL, Savy JB, Mensing RW, Chen JC (1989). Seismic hazard characterization of 69 nuclear power plant sites East of the Rocky Mountains. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report NUREG/CR-5250.
Beyer K, Bommer JJ (2006) Relationships between median values and between aleatory variabilities for different definitions of the horizontal component of motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96(4):1512–1522; Erratum, 97(5):1769, 2007
Bezdek JC, Solomon KH (1983) Upper limit lognormal distribution for drop size data. ASCE J Irr Drainage Eng 109(1):72–88
Bommer JJ (2002) Deterministic vs. probabilistic seismic hazard assessment: an exaggerated and obstructive dichotomy. J Earthqu Eng 6(Special Issue 1):43–73
Bommer JJ (2004) The use of empirical data, numerical simulation and expert judgment to define upper bounds on ground motions: Insights from the PEGASOS project. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Extreme Ground Motions at Yucca Mountain, Menlo Park, California, August 2004
Bommer JJ (2006) Re-thinking seismic hazard mapping and design return periods. In: Proceedings 1st ECEES, Geneva, Paper No. 1304.
Bommer JJ, Abrahamson NA (2006) Why do modern probabilistic seismic-hazard analyses often lead to increased hazard estimates? Bull Seismol Soc Am 96(6):1967–1977
Bommer JJ, Abrahamson NA, Strasser FO, Pecker A, Bard P-Y, Bungum H, Cotton F, Fäh D, Sabetta F, Scherbaum F, Studer J (2004) The challenge of defining upper bounds on earthquake ground motions. Seismol Res Lett 75(1):82–95
Bommer JJ, Douglas J, Strasser FO (2003) Style-of-faulting in ground-motion prediction equations. Bull Earthq Eng 1(2):171–203
Bommer JJ, Georgallides G, Tromans IJ (2001) Is there a near-field for small-to-moderate magnitude earthquakes? J Earthq Eng 5(3):395–423
Bommer J, Scherbaum F, Bungum H, Cotton F, Sabetta F, Abrahamson N (2005) On the use of logic-trees for ground-motion prediction equations in seismic-hazard analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95(2):377–389
Boore DM (1973) The effect of simple topography on seismic waves: Implications for the accelerations recorded at Pacoima Dam, San Fernando Valley, California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 63(5):1603–1609
Boore DM (2001) Comparisons of ground motions from the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake with empirical predictions largely based on data from California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 91(5):1212–1217
Boore DM, Atkinson GM (2006) Boore-Atkinson provisional NGA empirical ground-motion model for the average horizontal component of PGS, PGV and SA at spectral periods of 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 seconds, v1.7. Available from http://peer.berkeley.edu/lifelines/repngamodels.html
Boore DM, Graizer VM, Tinsley JC, Shakal AF (2004) A study of possible ground-motion amplification at the Coyote Lake Dam, California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94(4):1327–1342
Boore DM, Watson-Lamprey J, Abrahamson NA (2006) GMRotD and GMRotI: Orientation-independent measures of ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96(4A):1502–1511
Borcherdt RD, Glassmoyer G (1994) Influences of local geology on strong and weak ground motions recorded in the San Francisco Bay region and their implications for site-specific building-code provisions. In: Borcherdt RD (ed.) The Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989 – Strong Ground Motion. U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 1551-A:77–108
Bouchon M (1978) A dynamic source model for the San Fernando earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 68(6):1555–1576
Bouchon M, Barker JS (1996) Seismic response of a hill: The example of Tarzana, California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86(1):66–72
Campbell KW (1988) The Whittier Narrows, California earthquake of October 1, 1987 – Preliminary analysis of peak horizontal acceleration. Earthq Spectra 4(1):115–137
Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2006). Campbell-Bozorgnia NGA empirical ground motion model for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and SA at selected spectral periods ranging from 0.01 – 10.0 seconds (Version 1.0). Available from http://peer.berkeley.edu/lifelines/repngamodels.html
Carlisle H, Rollins KM (1994) Ground-response studies at the Alameda Naval Air Station. In: Borcherdt RD (ed.). The Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989 – Strong Ground Motion. U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 1551-A: 123–143.
Catchings RD, Lee WHK (1996) Shallow velocity structure and Poisson’s ratio at the Tarzana, California, strong-motion accelerometer site. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86(6):1704–1713
Chang T-Y, Cotton F, Angelier J (2001) Seismic attenuation and peak ground acceleration in Taiwan. Bull Seismol Soc Am 91(5):1229–1246
Chen K-C, Huang B-S, Wang J-H, Yen J-H (2002) Conjugate thrust faulting associated with the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake sequence. Geoph Res Lett 29(8), Art. No. 1277
Chen YH, Tsai CCP (2002) A new method for estimation of the attenuation relationship with variance components. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92(5):1984–1991
Chi W.-C, Dreger D (2004) Crustal deformation in Taiwan: Results from finite source inversions of six Mw> 5.8 Chi-Chi aftershocks. J Geoph Res 109(7), Art. No. B07305
Chiou BS-J, Youngs RR (2006) Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA empirical ground motion model for the average horizontal component of peak acceleration and pseudo-spectral acceleration for spectral periods of 0.01 to 10 seconds, interim report for USGS review. Available from http://peer.berkeley.edu/lifelines/repngamodels.html
Davis PM, Rubinstein JL, Liu KH, Gao SS, Knopoff L (2000) Northridge earthquake damage caused by geologic focusing of seismic waves. Science 289:1746–1750
Douglas J (2003a) Earthquake ground motion estimation using strong-motion records: a review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration and response spectral ordinates. Earth Sci Rev 61:43–104
Douglas J, Smit PM (2001) How accurate can strong ground motion attenuation relations be? Bull Seismol Soc Am 91(6):1917–1923
Draper NR, Smith H (1981) Applied regression analysis, 2nd Edn. Wiley, New York
EERI (2000) The Napa earthquake of September 3, 2000. EERI Special Earthquake Report, November 2000. http://www.eeri.org/lfe/pdf/usa_napa_eeri_preliminary_report.pdf
Field EH, Hough SE, Jacob KH, Friberg PA (1994) Site response in Oakland, California, near the failed section of the Nimitz Freeway. In: Borcherdt RD (ed.) The Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989 – Strong Ground Motion. U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 1551-A:169–180.
Gao S, Liu H, Davis PM, Knopoff L (1996) Localized amplification of seismic waves and correlation with damage due to the Northridge earthquake: evidence for focusing in Santa Monica. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86(1B):S209–S230
Graves RW, Pitarka A, Somerville PG (1998) Ground-motion amplification in the Santa Monica area: effects of shallow basin-edge structure. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88(5):1224–1242
Kagawa T, Irikura K, Somerville PG (2004) Differences in ground motion and fault rupture process between the surface and buried rupture earthquakes. Earth Planets Space 56(1):3–14
Kao H, Liu Y-H, Liang W-T, Chen W-P (2002) Source parameters of regional earthquakes in Taiwan:1999–2000 including the Chi-Chi earthquake sequence. TAO 13(3):279–298
Lee C-T, Cheng CT, Liao CW, Tsai YB (2001) Site classification of Taiwan free-field strong-motion stations. Bull Seismol Soc Am 91(5):1283–1297
Lussou P, Bard PY, Cotton F (2001) Seismic design regulation codes: Contribution of K-Net data to site effect evaluation. J Earthq Eng 5(1):13–33
Marin S, Avouac JP, Nicolas M, Schlupp A (2004) A probabilistic approach to seismic hazard in metropolitan France. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94(6):2137–2163
Martínez-Pereira A, Bommer JJ (1998) What is the near-field? In: Booth E (ed.) Seismic design practice into the next century, Balkema, pp 245–252
McGuire RK (1976) FORTRAN computer program for seismic risk analysis. US Geol Survey Open-File Report 76–67
Miranda E, Aslani H (2000) Brief Report on the September 3, 2000 Yountville/Napa California Earthquake. Report prepared for the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center. http://nisee.berkeley.edu/yountville/
PEER (2005) Documentation on the Next Generation Attenuation of Ground Motions (NGA) Project. http://peer.berkeley.edu/lifelines/nga.html and http://peer.berkeley.edu/nga/index.html
Peppin WA (1987) Exotic seismic phases recorded near Mammoth Lakes and their use in the delineation of shallow-crustal (magma) anomalies. Pageophys 125(6):1008–1023
Rial JA (1996) The anomalous seismic response of the ground at the Tarzana Hill site during the Northridge 1994 southern California earthquake: a resonant, sliding block? Bull Seismol Soc Am 86(6):1714–1723
Reimer RB, Clough RW, Raphael JM (1974) Seismic response of Pacoima Dam in the San Fernando earthquake. In: Proceedings of the Fifth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Rome, Vol. 2:2328–2337
Restrepo-Vélez LF, Bommer JJ (2003) An exploration of the nature of the scatter in ground-motion prediction equations and the implications for seismic hazard assessment. J Earthq Eng 7(Special Issue 1):171–199
Romeo R, Prestininzi A (2000) Probabilistic versus deterministic hazard analysis: an integrated approach for siting problems. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 20(1–4):75–84
Seno T, Otsuki K, Yang CN (2000) The1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake: a subduction zone earthquake on land. Bull Earthq Res Inst 75:57–77
Shakal A, Huang MJ, Cao TQ (1988) The Whittier Narrows, California, earthquake of October 1, 1987 – CSMIP strong motion data. Earthq Spectra 4(1):75–100
Shakal AF, Huang MJ, Darragh RB (1996) Interpretation of significant ground-response and structure strong motions recorded during the 1994 Northridge earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86(1B):S231–S246
Somerville PG, Smith NF, Graves RG (1994) Effect of critical reflections from the Moho on the attenuation of strong ground motion. In: Borcherdt RD (ed.) The Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989 – Strong Ground Motion. U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 1551-A:67–76
Somerville PG, Smith NF, Graves RW, Abrahamson NA (1997) Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity. Seism Res Lett 68(1):199–222
Somerville P, Yoshimura J (1990) The influence of critical Moho reflections on strong ground motions recorded in San Francisco and Oakland during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Geoph Res Lett 17(8):1203–206
Spudich P, Hellweg M, Lee WHK (1996) Directional topographic site response at Tarzana observed in aftershocks of the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake: Implications for mainshock motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86(1B):S193–S208
Stepp JC, Wong I, Whitney J, Quittemeyer R, Abrahamson N, Toro G, Youngs R, Coppersmith K, Savy J, Sullivan T, Yucca Mountain PSHA project members (2001) Probabilistic seismic hazard analyses for ground motions and fault displacements at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Earthq Spectra 17(1):113–151
Strasser FO, Bommer JJ (2004) Outliers in strong-motion datasets. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Extreme Ground Motions at Yucca Mountain, Menlo Park, California, August 2004.
Strasser FO, Bommer JJ (2005) Large positive ground-motion residuals in the NGA/PEER database. Research Report 05–001-SM, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London. Available online at: http://www.imperial.ac.uk/civilengineering/research/researchnewsandreports/researchreports/
USGS (2000) The September 3, 2000 Yountville Earthquake, U.S. Geological Survey, Earthquake Hazards Program online Report (last modified 7/12/2000)
Vahdani S, Wikstrom S (2002) Response of the Tarzana strong motion site during the 1994 Northridge earthquake. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22(9–12):837–848
Vidale JE, Bonamassa O (1994). Influence of near-surface geology on the direction of ground motion above a frequency of 1 Hz. In: Borcherdt RD (ed.) The Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989 – Strong Ground Motion. U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 1551-A:61–66
Wang G-Q, Boore DM, Igel H, Zhou X-Y (2004) Comparisons of ground motions from five aftershocks of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake with empirical predictions largely based on data from California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94(6):2198–2212
Wen K-L, Peng H-Y, Tsai YB, Chen KC (2001) Why 1G was recorded at TCU129 site during the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 91(5):1255–1266
Wong HL, Jennings PC (1975) Effects of canyon topography on strong ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65(5):1239–1257
Zemell SH (1984) Imposed upper limit for probabilistic seismic risk. In: Proceedings of the 8th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vol. I:239–245.