Treatment of gingival recession with coronally advanced flap procedures: a systematic review

Journal of Clinical Periodontology - Tập 35 Số s8 - Trang 136-162 - 2008
Francesco Cairo1, Umberto Pagliaro1, Michele Nieri1
1Department of Periodontology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

Tóm tắt

Abstract

Background: The treatment of buccal gingival recessions is a common requirement due to aesthetic concern or root sensitivity. The aim of this manuscript was to systematically review the literature on coronally advanced flap (CAF) alone or in combination with tissue grafts, barrier membranes (BM), enamel matrix derivative (EMD) or other material for treating gingival recession.

Material and Methods: Randomized clinical trials on treatment of Miller Class I and II gingival recessions with at least 6 months of follow‐up were identified. Data sources included electronic databases and hand‐searched journals. The primary outcome variable was complete root coverage (CRC). The secondary outcome variables were recession reduction, clinical attachment gain, keratinized tissue gain, aesthetic satisfaction, root sensitivity, post‐operative patient pain and complications.

Results: A total of 794 Miller Class I and II gingival recessions in 530 patients from 25 RCTs were evaluated in this systematic review. CAF was associated with mean recession reduction and CRC. The addition of connective tissue graft (CTG) or EMD enhanced the clinical outcomes of CAF in terms of CRC, while BM did not. The results with respect to the adjunctive use of acellular dermal matrix were controversial.

Conclusions: CTG or EMD in conjunction with CAF enhances the probability of obtaining CRC in Miller Class I and II single gingival recessions.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1902/jop.2001.72.8.998

10.1902/jop.2000.71.6.989

10.1902/jop.1999.70.2.123

10.1902/jop.2006.77.1.7

Cortellini P. Baldi C. Francetti L. Raperini G. Rotundo R. Nieri M. Franceschi D. Labriola A. Tonetti M.&Pini Prato G.Comparative study of coronally advanced flap and bilaminar technique in the treatment of gingival recessions. A multi‐centre randomized double blind clinical study. Unpublished Data.

10.1902/jop.2004.75.8.1137

10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00969.x

10.1902/jop.2004.75.3.413

10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00831.x

10.1902/jop.2005.76.10.1768

10.1902/jop.1998.69.3.383

10.1902/jop.2007.060428

10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00706.x

10.1902/jop.2003.74.2.168

10.1902/jop.2003.74.8.1110

10.1902/jop.2000.71.11.1693

10.1902/jop.2002.73.11.1299

10.1902/jop.2006.050390

10.1902/jop.2000.72.9.1258

10.1902/jop.2005.76.11.1871

10.1902/jop.2002.73.12.1405

10.1902/jop.2000.71.2.299

10.1902/jop.1998.69.11.1271

10.1902/jop.2001.72.10.1301

10.1902/jop.2005.76.6.881

10.1902/jop.2004.75.1.44

10.1902/jop.1998.69.2.138

10.1902/jop.2005.76.2.256

Al‐Zahrani M. S., 2004, Effect of connective tissue graft orientation on root coverage and gingival augmentation, International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 24, 65

10.1902/jop.2004.75.10.1350

10.1111/j.1708-8240.2005.tb00105.x

Barros R. R., 2007, A 36‐month randomised controlled prospective clinical study of a conventional and a new surgical approach for root coverage with acellular dermal matrix graft, PERIO, 4, 55

Berlucchi I., 2002, Enamel matrix proteins (Emdogain) in combination with coronally advanced flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of shallow gingival recessions, International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 22, 583

Bertoldi C., 2007, Augmentation of keratinized gengiva through bilaminar connective tissue grafts, Minerva Stomatologica, 56, 3

10.1902/jop.2006.050114

10.1902/jop.2007.060507

10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00660.x

10.1902/jop.2000.71.4.568

10.1902/jop.2003.74.8.1196

10.1902/jop.2004.75.12.1678

10.1902/jop.2004.75.7.949

Dodge J. R., 2000, Improved bone regeneration and root coverage using a resorbable membrane with fisically assisted cell migration and DFDBA, International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 20, 399

10.1902/jop.2000.71.11.1687

10.1902/jop.2007.060356

Francetti L., 2005, Microsurgical treatment of gingival recession, International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 25, 181

10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.290106.x

Harris R. J., 2000, A comparative study of root coverage obtained with an acellular dermal matrix versus a connective tissue graft, International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 20, 51

10.1902/jop.2005.76.10.1758

10.1902/jop.2001.72.5.571

Ito C., 2000, A preliminary comparative study of the guided tissue regeneration and free gingival graft procedures for adjacent facial root coverage, Quintessence International, 31, 319

Kassab M. M., 2006, The effect of EDTA in attachment gain and root coverage, Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry, 27, 353

10.1902/jop.2004.75.2.210

10.1902/jop.2007.060380

10.1902/jop.2005.76.6.867

10.1902/jop.2006.050008

10.1902/jop.2004.75.4.600

10.1902/jop.2001.72.11.1477

10.1902/jop.2002.73.1.53

10.1902/jop.2000.71.2.188

Rahmani M. E., 2006, Comparative clinical evaluation of acellular dermal matrix allograft and connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession, Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 7, 63, 10.5005/jcdp-7-2-63

Ricci G., 1996, A clinical/statistical comparison between the subpedicle connective tissue graft method and the guided tissue regeneration technique in root coverage, International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 16, 539

10.1902/jop.2000.71.9.1441

10.1902/jop.2007.060170

10.1902/jop.2006.77.1.81

10.1902/jop.2005.76.11.1842

10.1902/jop.2004.75.11.1446

10.1034/j.1600-051X.2003.00397.x

10.1902/jop.2003.74.10.1520

10.1902/jop.1989.60.6.316

10.1902/annals.1996.1.1.702

10.1111/j.1600-0765.2007.00971.x

10.1902/jop.2003.74.5.741

10.1093/ije/31.1.140

10.1016/0895-4356(92)90054-Q

10.1902/jop.2005.76.11.1814

10.1016/j.jebdp.2007.01.001

10.1902/jop.2000.71.8.1327

10.1902/jop.1956.27.2.92

10.1902/jop.1998.69.11.1305

Higgins J. P., 2006, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.6

10.1902/jop.2006.060107

10.1902/jop.1985.56.12.715

10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90029-4

Miller P. D., 1985, A classification of marginal tissue recession, International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 5, 8

10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04149-5

10.1034/j.1600-051X.29.s3.15.x

10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.303

10.1902/jop.2003.74.5.709

Pini Prato G., Coronally advanced flap procedure for root coverage. Flap with tension versus flap without tension, Journal of Periodontology, 71, 188, 10.1902/jop.2000.71.2.188

10.1902/jop.1992.63.11.919

10.1902/jop.2005.76.5.713

Rasperini G., 2000, Clinical and histologic evaluation of human gingival recession treated with a subepithelial connective tissue graft and enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain), International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 20, 269

10.1034/j.1600-051X.29.s3.11.x

Sullivan H. C., 1968, Free autogenous gingival grafts. 3. Utilization of grafts in the treatment of gingival recession, Periodontics, 6, 152

Wennström J. L., 1994, Proceedings of the First European Workshop on Periodontology, 193

10.1111/j.1600-051X.1996.tb00608.x

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Clinical Periodontology

Tập 35 Số s8

136-162

Thông tin tác giả