Transferring Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Cancer Patients Back to Acute Care (TRIPBAC)

Wiley - Tập 6 Số 9 - Trang 808-813 - 2014
Arash Arash, Pamela S. Pamela S., Catherine Catherine, Garret Garret, Richard V. Richard V., Andre Andre

Tóm tắt

Objective

To determine predictive factors for TRansferring Inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) cancer Patients Back to Acute Care (TRIPBAC).

Design

A retrospective chart review of patients with cancer admitted to an IRF from 2009 to 2010 because of a functional impairment that developed as a direct consequence of their cancer or its treatment.

Setting

IRF of a community‐based, academic, tertiary care facility.

Methods

The characterization of patients with cancer in the IRF was primarily based on analysis of the IRF Patient Assessment Instrument and other internal IRF data logs.

Main Outcome Measurement

Frequency and reasons for TRIPBAC.

Results

The TRIPBAC rate in our IRF was 17.4%. The most common reasons for TRIPBAC were postneurosurgical complications (31%). Factors associated with TRIPBAC were a motor Functional Independence Measure score of 35 points or lower on admission (odds ratio 4.01, 95% confidence interval 1.79‐8.98; P = .001) and the presence of a feeding tube or a modified diet (odds ratio 3.18, 95% confidence interval 1.44‐7.04; P = .004).

Conclusions

Motor Functional Independence Measure score on admission is the best predictor for TRIPBAC in patients with cancer admitted to our IRF, followed by the presence of a feeding tube or a modified diet.


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1053/j.seminoncol.2004.11.009 Cancer Facts and Figures 2012. American Cancer Society. Available athttp://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/documents/document/acspc‐031941.pdf. Accessed January 27 2014. 10.1002/1097-0142(20010815)92:4 <1039::AID-CNCR1417>3.0.CO;2-L Cromes G., 1978, Implementation of interdisciplinary cancer rehabilitation, Rehabil Counseling Bull, 21, 230 10.1002/1097-0142(20010815)92:4 <970::AID-CNCR1408>3.0.CO;2-T 10.1053/S0003-9993(03)00345-9 10.1080/16501970306129 Gerber L., 2005, Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology, 2719 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31817fb94e 10.4065/74.9.939 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90220-8 10.1016/S0025-7125(16)32757-2 10.1002/jso.20777 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Chapter 15: Covered Medical and Other Health Services. In: Medicare Benefit Policy Manual. Available at:http://www.cms.gov/Regulations‐and‐Guidance/Guidance/Manuals/downloads/bp102c15.pdf. Accessed January 27 2014. 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.01.014 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.08.219 10.1161/01.STR.32.2.523 Hammond F.M., 2013, Acute rehospitalizations during inpatient rehabilitation for spinal cord injury, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 94, S98, 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.11.051 10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90224-0 Clark J., 2004, Developing a comprehensive cancer center rehabilitation program, J Oncol Manag, 13, 13 Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services. Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility‐Patient Assessment Instrument Training Manual 2004. Available athttp://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare‐Fee‐for‐Service‐Payment/InpatientRehabFacPPS/downloads/irfpaimanual040104.pdf. Accessed January 27 2014. Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation, 2010, The UDS‐PRO® System 10.1002/j.2048-7940.2011.tb00075.x 10.1053/apmr.2000.20620 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90130-6 Shin K.Y., 2011, Inpatient cancer rehabilitation: The experience of a national comprehensive cancer center, Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 90, S63, 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31820be1a4 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.08.592 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.05.028 10.1097/TA.0b013e318270d73d