Transfer of Specific Moment to General Knowledge: Suggestions from Cultural Developmental Autoethnography and Autoethnographic Trajectory Equifinality Modeling
Tóm tắt
An essential point when considering the relationship between cultural psychology and autoethnography is the way dynamic experiences, which change with time, persons, and contexts can be transformed into the universal ways in which they are organized. This paper considered how we can do so using Valsiner’s work and cultural developmental autoethnography. Previous studies have not paid sufficient attention to dealing with the developmental aspects of autoethnography. In order to deepen the aspect of “culture” in autoethnography, it is necessary to understand a person’s life as it is developing while constructing and using one’s “own” culture to the contingent future. The important point here is to understand the minimal moment from the perspective of a person on the trajectory, while simultaneously examining the dimensions of the self that develop with culture, while being systemically connected to others. Such a research process requires an awareness of the duality of the self as one system (the dialogical self), while simultaneously being a part of a more macro-system. Autoethnographic trajectory equifinality modeling is a process of modeling this duality and can be one approach to cultural developmental autoethnography that has the transferability of specific moments into universal knowledge through relationships with others.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adams, T. E., & Herrmann, A. F. (2020). Expanding our autoethnographic future. Journal of Autoethnography, 1(1), 1–8
Anderson, L. (2006). Analytic autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 373–395
Bastos, A. C. (2017). Shadow trajectories: The poetic motion of motherhood meanings through the lens of lived temporality. Culture and Psychology, 23(3), 408–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X16655458
Carriere, K. R. (2021). Building from the basics: The stem concept and the need for methodological advancement. Human Arenas.
Chang, H., Ngunjiri, F., & Hernandez, K.-A.C. (2013). Collaborative autoethnography. Routledge.
Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An Overview. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 36(4), 273–290. Available online: https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.36.2011.4.273-290. Accessed Feb 2021.
Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 733–768). SAGE.
Hayano, D. M. (1979). Auto-ethnography: Paradigms, problems, and prospects. Journal of Anthoropological Research, 38(1), 99–104
Lehmann, O. V., & Valsiner, J. (2017). Deep Experiencing: Dialogues within the self. Springer.
Okishio, M. (2013). Dialogical autoethnography: Applying a new method of qualitative research through in-depth conversation. Japanese Journal of Qualitative Psychology, 12, 157–175. Original in Japanese. https://doi.org/10.24525/jaqp.12.1_157
Reed-Danahay, D. (1997). Introduction. In D. Reed-Danahay (Ed.), Auto/ethnography: Rewriting the self and the social. (pp. 1–17). Berg Publishers.
Sato, T. (2017). Collected papers on trajectory equifinality approach. Chitose Press. Original in Japanese.
Teruyama, J. (2013). Native ethnography. In Y. Fujita & A. Kitamura (Eds.), Contemporary ethnography: New fieldwork theory and practice (word map) (pp. 68–73). Shinyousha. Original in Japanese.
Tsuchimoto, T. (2020). Autoethnography of career support in transition. Ritsumeikan University Doctoral Thesis. Original in Japanese. Available online: https://doi.org/10.34382/00014037. Accessed Feb 2021.
Tsuchimoto, T., & Sato, T. (2020). Jointing educational and developmental psychology and career education (Psychology of Career and Culture (1)). Science for Human Services Magazine, 42, 288–303. Original in Japanese. Available online: https://www.humanservices.jp/wp/wp-content/uploads/magazine/vol42/51.pdf. Accessed Feb 2021.
Valsiner, J. (2004a). Culture and human development. Sage.
Valsiner, J. (2004). The promoter sign: developmental transformation within the structure of dialogical self. Paper Presented at the Biennial Meeting of the International Society for the Study of Behavioural Development (ISSBD).
Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies: Foundations of cultural psychology. SAGE.
Valsiner, J. (2016). An invitation to cultural psychology. SAGE.
Valsiner, J. (2018). Needed in psychology: Theoretical precision. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 14(1), 1–6. Available online: https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v14i1.1602. Accessed Feb 2021.
Valsiner, J., & Sato, T. (2005). Historically structured sampling (HSS): How can psychology’s methodology become tuned in to the reality of the historical nature of cultural psychology? In J. Straub, C. Kölbl, D. Weidemann, & B. Zielke (Eds.), Pursuit of Meaning: Theoretical and Methodological Advances Cultural and Cross-Cultural Psychology (pp. 215–252). Transcript. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839402344-010
Valsiner, J., Marsico, G., Chaudhary, N., Sato, T., & Dazzani, V. (Eds.). (2016). Psychology as a science of human being: The Yokohama Manifesto, Annals of Theoretical Psychology, 13. Springer.
Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. George Braziller.
Xu, S. & Wu, A. (2021). Transitions and psychology as a developmental science: building up on Jaan Valsiner’s work. Human Arenas.
Yamada, Y. (2002). The process of model construction based on qualitative data in field psychology: Figurative models from image drawings of “this world and the next world.” Japanese Journal of Qualitative Psychology, 1, 107–128. Original in Japanese. Available online: https://doi.org/10.24525/jaqp.1.1_107. Accessed Feb 2021.
Zittoun, T. (2015). Transitions, imagination and TEM (Translated by Ayae Kido). In Y. Yasuda, A. Nameda, M. Fukuda, & T. Sato (Eds.), Theory of TEA: Learning the basics of thetrajectory equifinality approach (word map) (pp. 97–100). Shinyousha.