Towards a Daoist Ethic: a Laozi’an “Model of Modeling”
Tóm tắt
This article suggests that the writings of the Huang Lao tradition embody an ethic in the sense of a guiding philosophy of life. This ethic is based on the Laozi - the initial text in the tradition that is textually presented in paradoxes. While the paradoxical expression could make readers forgo an ethic, we claim that it is the other way around. The paradoxes, as we explain in this article, are inherent to the tradition, and reflect a unique reasoning described here as riddles lived by or living riddles. We suggest that Laozi 1 suggests riddle reasoning that is based on an understanding Dao as at once kedao可道 (“can be daoed”) and changdao常道 (constant Dao). While changdao is the ineffable unity, kedao is plurality, hence it may be expressed as familiar moral ways when alone. Only when unified with changdao, Dao opens a gate to the mysteries of life. The mystery suggested here is a “model of modeling” as suggested in Laozi 25 that represents the unified Dao riddle reasoning rather than dichotomizing (kedao) reasoning. According to the model we refer to, the Laozi’an De as self-so (ziran自然) that serves as foundation for an ethic that is not dichotomizing and has no dependence whatsoever on morality. We suggest that this ethic can serve as a basis for the analysis of the Huang Lao tradition as a whole.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ames, R. T. and Hall, D. L., (trs). (2003). Daodejing: “Making This Life Significant.” A Philosophical Translation. Ballantine.
Chan, A. K. L. (1998). A Tale of Two Commentaries: Ho-shang-kung and Wang Pi on the Lao-tzu. In L. Kohn & M. LaFargue (Eds.), Lao-tzu and the Tao-te-ching (pp. 89–117). State University of New York Press.
Chan, S. (Ed.). (2019). Dao companion to the excavated Guodian bamboo manuscripts. Springer Press.
Chen Guying 陳鼓應. (2015). Guanzi sipian quanshi管子四篇詮釋. The Commercial Press
Cheng, C.-Y. (2004). Dimensions of the Dao and onto-ethics in light of the DDJ. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 31(2), 143–182.
Feng Youlan 馮友蘭. (1985). Zhongguo zhexue jianshi中國哲學簡史. Peking University Press.
Graham, A. C. (1986). The Origins of the Legend of Lao Tan Singapore: Institute of East Asian Philosophies. Reprinted in A. C. Graham, Studies in Chinese Philosophy and Philosophical Literature. State University of New York Press, 1990.
Henricks, R. (2000). Lao Tzu's Tao Te Ching: A translation of the startling new documents found at Guodian. Columbia University Press.
Hume, D.. (1978). Treatise of Human Nature. Clarendon Press
Kohn, L. (1998). The Lao-tzu Myth. In L. Kohn & M. LaFargue (Eds.), Lao-tzu and the Tao-te-ching. State University of New York Press.
Patt-Shamir, G.. (2009). “To live a riddle: The transformative aspect of the Laozi《老子》.” JCP 36(3), 408–23.
Peking University Research Institute of Excavated Manuscripts (ed.) (2012). Beijing daxue cang xihan zhushu 北京大學藏西漢竹書 (vol.1).
Small, S. Y. (2019a). Creativity and Diversity: Generating a Universe in Early Daoist Texts. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 46(3-4), 236–252.
Small, S. Y. (2019b). Authority and authenticity in the Laozi—Wu as a philosophical framework. Religions.
Wang Bo王博. (1993. Laozi sijiang tanyuan ji yanjiu老子思想探源及研究. Wenjin chubanshe.
Zhang Dainian張岱年. (1996). Zhongguo gudian zhexue gainian fanchou yaolun中國古典哲學概念範疇要論, in: Zhang Dainian Quanji張岱年全集, vol.4. Hebei renmin chubanshe.
Zhu Bokun朱伯崑. (1984). Xianqin lunli xue gailun先秦伦理学概论. Jinian guan daxue chubanshe.