Top‐cited articles in digestive system disease from 1950 to 2013

Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia) - Tập 31 Số 1 - Trang 107-111 - 2016
Xiaowei Tang1, Wei Gong1, Fangfang Yuan1, Ran Li1, Xiaomei Han1, Silin Huang1, Fachao Zhi1, Bo Jiang1
1Department of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China

Tóm tắt

AbstractBackground and Aim

Examination of top‐cited articles is a tool that can help to identify and monitor outstanding scientific researches and landmark papers. We aimed to identify the 100 most cited published papers in peer‐reviewed biomedical journals in the field of digestive diseases and to examine their characteristics.

Methods

The Web of Science (including Science Citation Index) was searched for the most cited papers related to digestive diseases, published from 1955 to the present. The top 100 most cited articles were identified. The number of citations, countries, and institutions of origin, year of publication, study design, topic, and levels of evidence of the articles were noted and analyzed.

Results

The most top‐cited articles had a mean of 1375 citations. These articles were published between 1978 and 2009 in 29 high‐impact journals, with the New England Journal of Medicine (n = 22) topping the list. Of the 100 articles, 34 were clinical studies, 15 were review articles, and 34 were concerned basic science. These articles came from 18 countries, with the USA contributing most of the top‐cited articles (n = 53). Eighty‐seven institutions produced these 100 top‐cited articles, led by the University of Barcelona (n = 4). Seven persons authored two or more of these top‐cited articles. The mostly represented specialty was gastrointestinal oncology (n = 49).

Conclusions

Our study can give a historical perspective on the scientific progress of digestive diseases, as well as allow for recognition of most important advances in this area and provide useful information to guide future researches.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1177/1049732305285701

10.1126/science.178.4060.471

Garfield E., 1977, Introducing citation classics: the human side of scientific reports, Curr Contents, 3, 1

10.1001/archopht.125.7.952

10.5489/cuaj.1123

10.1016/j.ajem.2006.01.001

10.1097/01.pra.0000432604.06835.da

10.1007/s11999-010-1604-1

10.1016/j.jcrc.2008.12.010

Web of Knowledge.ISI Web of Knowledge.2011. [Accessed on 25 September 2013.] Available from URL:http://apps.webofknowledge.com/

10.1056/NEJMoa032691

10.1038/nri1132

10.1136/bmj.2.6138.653

10.1038/ng.449

PhillipsB BallC SackettDet al.Levels of evidence. Available from URL:http://www.cebm. net/index.aspx?o=1025. Accessed on 1 October2013.

GarfieldE.What is a citation classic?Available from URL:http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/ classics.html. Accessed on October 52013.

10.3322/caac.20107

10.1016/j.apmr.2010.01.011

10.2319/040512-284.1

10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.037

Campbell FM, 1990, National bias: a comparison of citation practices by health professionals, Bull. Med. Libr. Assoc., 78, 376

10.1001/jama.280.3.246

10.1186/1471-2253-11-24

10.1023/A:1012798911792

10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00388.x

10.1016/j.jad.2011.05.031

Brandt JS, 2010, Citation classics in obstetrics and gynecology: the 100 most frequently cited journal articles in the last 50 years, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 203, 1, 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.07.025

10.1093/jpepsy/jsm122

10.1038/381186a0

10.1038/415731a

10.1038/415732a