To peer or not to peer: A controlled peer-editing intervention measuring writing self-efficacy in South Korean higher education

AbuSeileek, 2014, Using peer computer-mediated corrective feedback to support EFL learners’ writing, Language Learning & Technology, 18, 76 Ahmed, 2021, Online and face-to-face peer review in academic writing: Frequency and preferences, Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7, 169, 10.32601/ejal.911245 Ali Akbar, 2019, Assessing peer review pattern and the effect of face-to-face and mobile-mediated modes on students’ academic writing development, Language Testing in Asia, 9, 1 Alharbi, 2019, Exploring the potential of Google Doc in facilitating innovative teaching and learning practices in an EFL writing course, Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14, 227, 10.1080/17501229.2019.1572157 Amores, 1997, A new perspective on peer-editing, Foreign Language Annals, 30, 513, 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1997.tb00858.x Bandura, 1977, Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change, Psychological Review, 84, 191, 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 Bandura, 1989, Human agency in social cognitive theory, American Psychologist, 44, 1175, 10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175 Bell, 1991, Using peer response groups in ESL writing classes, TESL Canada Journal, 8, 65, 10.18806/tesl.v8i2.589 Braine, 2003, From a teacher-centered to a student-centered approach: A study of peer feedback in Hong Kong writing classes, Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 13, 269, 10.1075/japc.13.2.05bra Campbell, 2020, Face-to-face and online instructional delivery formats: a mixed-methods study of teacher self-efficacy in higher education, International Journal of Education, 12, 163, 10.5296/ije.v12i4.17853 Campbell, 1963 Carson, 1996, Chinese students’ perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction, Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 1, 10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90012-0 Chang, 2016, Two decades of research in L2 peer review, Journal of Writing Research, 8, 81, 10.17239/jowr-2016.08.01.03 Chang, 2012, Peer review via three modes in an EFL writing course, Computers and Composition, 29, 63, 10.1016/j.compcom.2012.01.001 Chen, 2010, Graduate students’ self-reported perspectives regarding peer feedback and feedback from writing consultants, Asia Pacific Education Review, 11, 151, 10.1007/s12564-010-9081-5 Chen, 2016, Technology-supported peer feedback in ESL/EFL writing classes: A research synthesis, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29, 365, 10.1080/09588221.2014.960942 Chen, 2009, An educational research course facilitated by online peer assessment, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 105, 10.1080/14703290802646297 Cheung, 2021, Language teaching during a pandemic: A case study of Zoom use by a secondary ESL teacher in Hong Kong, RELC Journal Cohen, 1992, Statistical power analysis, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 98, 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783 Collimore, 2015, So what do you think? Canadian students’ attitudes about Peer Scholar, an online peer-assessment tool, Learning Environments Research, 18, 33, 10.1007/s10984-014-9170-1 Cook, 1979 Cui, 2021, Effects of trained peer vs. teacher feedback on EFL students’ writing performance, self-efficacy, and internalization of motivation, Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.788474 Dancer, 1992, Peer rating in higher education, Journal of Education for Business, 67, 306, 10.1080/08832323.1992.10117564 Deci, 2012, Multiple identities within a single self, 225 DiGiovanni, 2001, Online peer review: An alternative to face-to-face, ELT Journal, 55, 263, 10.1093/elt/55.3.263 Dolenc-Nott, 2015 Dolighan, 2021, Teacher efficacy for online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic, Brock Education Journal, 30, 95, 10.26522/brocked.v30i1.851 Eberle, 2021, The lonely struggle with autonomy: A case study of first-year university students’ experiences during emergency online teaching, Computers in Human Behavior, 121 Ferris, 2005, Building a community of writers: Principles of peer response, 223 Flower, 1981, A cognitive process theory of writing, College Composition and Communication, 32, 365, 10.2307/356600 Getzlaf, 2009, Effective instructor feedback: Perceptions of online graduate students, The Journal of Educators Online, 6, 10.9743/JEO.2009.2.1 Guardado, 2007, ESL students' experiences of online peer feedback, Computers and Composition, 24, 443, 10.1016/j.compcom.2007.03.002 Hedgcock, 1992, Collaborative oral/aural revision in foreign language writing instruction, Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 255, 10.1016/1060-3743(92)90006-B Henson, 2002, Teacher Self-Efficacy: Substantive Implications and Measurement Dilemmas Hill, 2005, Revisiting the retrospective pretest, American Journal of Evaluation, 26, 501, 10.1177/1098214005281356 Hislop, 2017, 12, 9 Ho, 2007, Face-to-face and computer-mediated peer review in EFL writing, CALICO Journal, 24, 269, 10.1558/cj.v24i2.269-290 Howard, 1979, Internal invalidity in pretest-posttest self-report evaluations and a re-evaluation of retrospective pretests, Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 1, 10.1177/014662167900300101 Hsieh, 2016, A case study of the dynamics of scaffolding among ESL learners and online resources in collaborative learning, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30, 115 Hyland, 2006, Contexts and issues in feedback on L2 writing: An introduction, 1 Jeffery, 2020, Students’ responses to emergency remote online teaching reveal critical factors for all teaching, Journal of Chemical Education, 97, 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00736 Kim, 2015, Preparing English learners for effective peer review in the writers' workshop, The Reading Teacher, 68, 599, 10.1002/trtr.1358 Klatt, 2005, Synthesis of literature relative to the retrospective pretest design, 1 Kohnke, 2020, Facilitating synchronous online language learning through Zoom, RELC Journal Lam, 2013, The relationship between assessment types and text revision, ELT Journal, 67, 446, 10.1093/elt/cct034 Lee, 2015, Peer feedback in second language writing: Investigating junior secondary students’ perspectives of inter-feedback and intra-feedback, System, 55, 1, 10.1016/j.system.2015.08.003 Lee, 2019, Investigating the operating mechanisms of the sources of L2 writing self-efficacy at the stages of giving and receiving peer feedback, The Modern Language Journal, 103, 831, 10.1111/modl.12598 Li, 2021, Tracing the path toward self-regulated revision: An interplay of instructor feedback, peer feedback, and revision goals, Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.612088 Liang, 2010, Using synchronous online peer response groups in EFL writing: Revision-related discourse, Language Learning & Technology, 14, 45 Lin, 2001, Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking styles, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 420, 10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00198.x Liu, 2003, The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, 193, 10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00025-0 Lockhart, 1995, Analyzing talk in ESL peer response groups: Stances, functions, and content, Language Learning, 45, 605, 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00456.x Ludemann, 2014, Perceived helpfulness of peer editing activities: First-year students’ views and writing performance outcomes, Psychology Learning & Teaching, 13, 129, 10.2304/plat.2014.13.2.129 Lundstrom, 2009, To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing, Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 30, 10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002 Mangelsdorf, 1992, Peer reviews in the ESL composition classroom: What do the students think?, ELT Journal, 46, 274, 10.1093/elt/46.3.274 Mann, 1997, Implications of the response-shift bias for management, Journal of Management Development, 16, 328, 10.1108/02621719710174516 Md. Deni, 2011, Peer-editing practice in the writing classroom: Benefits and drawbacks, Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 2, 92, 10.7575/aiac.alls.v.2n.1p.92 Memari Hanjani, 2015, Peer collaboration in L2 writing: An Iranian experience, 93 Memari Hanjani, 2015, Collaborative revision in L2 writing: Learners’ reflections, ELT Journal, 70, 296, 10.1093/elt/ccv053 Memari Hanjani, 2019, Collective peer scaffolding, self-revision, and writing progress of novice EFL learners, International Journal of English Studies, 19, 41, 10.6018/ijes.331771 Miao, 2006, A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class, Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 179, 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004 Min, 2006, The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality, Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 118, 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003 Mirick, 2019, Teaching note-online peer review: Students’ experiences in a writing-intensive BSW course, Journal of Social Work Education, 56, 1 Murad, 2018, Engaging EFL learners in online peer feedback on writing: What does it tell us?, Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 17, 39, 10.28945/3980 Nelson, 1998, ESL students’ perceptions of effectiveness of peer response groups, Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 113, 10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90010-8 Nilson, 2003, Improving student peer feedback, College Teaching, 51, 34, 10.1080/87567550309596408 O'Neill, 2020, Team health and project quality are improved when peer evaluation scores affect grades on team projects, Frontiers in Education, 5 Pajares, 2003, Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature, Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 139, 10.1080/10573560308222 Pajares, 2001, Response format in writing self-efficacy assessment: Greater discrimination increases prediction, Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 33, 214, 10.1080/07481756.2001.12069012 Pajares, 2001, Gender differences in writing motivation and achievement of middle school students: A function of gender orientation?, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 366, 10.1006/ceps.2000.1069 Paulhus, 1991, Measurement and control of response bias Petillion, 2020, Student experiences of emergency remote teaching: Impacts of instructor practice on student learning, engagement, and well-being, Journal of Chemical Education, 97, 2486, 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00733 Pohl, 1982, Using retrospective pre-ratings to counteract response-shift confounding, The Journal of Experimental Education, 50, 211, 10.1080/00220973.1982.11011826 Pond, 1995, Peer review: a precursor to peer assessment, Innovations in Education and Training International, 32, 314, 10.1080/1355800950320403 Prat-Sala, 2012, Writing essays: Does self-efficacy matter? The relationship between self-efficacy in reading and in writing and undergraduate students’ performance in essay writing, Educational Psychology, 32, 9, 10.1080/01443410.2011.621411 Ramanthan, 1999, Individualism, academic writing, and ESL writers, Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 45, 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80112-X Reason, 2009, An examination of persistence research through the lens of a comprehensive conceptual framework, Journal of College Student Development, 50, 659, 10.1353/csd.0.0098 Rockwell, 1989, Post-then-pre evaluation, Journal of Extension, 27 Rodríguez-González, 2016, The effects and perceptions of trained peer feedback in L2 speaking: Impact on revision and speaking quality, Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 12, 120, 10.1080/17501229.2015.1108978 Rollinson, 2005, Using peer feedback in the EFL writing class, ELT Journal, 59, 23, 10.1093/elt/cci003 Ruegg, 2014, The effect of peer and teacher feedback on changes in EFL students’ writing self-efficacy, The Language Learning Journal, 46, 87, 10.1080/09571736.2014.958190 Sanjeev, 2014, Response order effects in online surveys, International Journal of Online Marketing, 4, 28, 10.4018/ijom.2014040103 Schmid, 1999 Schneider, 2016, Extracting response style bias from measures of positive and negative affect in aging research, The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 73, 64 Schwartz, 2010, Guidelines for improving the stringency of response shift research using the thentest, Quality of Life Research, 19, 455, 10.1007/s11136-010-9585-9 Sengupta, 1998, Peer evaluation: ‘I am not the teacher, ELT Journal, 52, 19, 10.1093/eltj/52.1.19 Sherafati, 2020, Exploring the effect of computer-mediated teacher feedback on the writing achievement of Iranian EFL learners: Does motivation count?, Education and Information Technologies, 25, 4591, 10.1007/s10639-020-10177-5 Shute, 2008, Focus on formative feedback, Review of Educational Research, 78, 153, 10.3102/0034654307313795 Tang, 1999, Peer response in ESL writing, TESL Canada Journal, 16, 20, 10.18806/tesl.v16i2.716 Tsui, 2000, Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?, Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 147, 10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00022-9 Vygotsky, 1978 Wang, 2014, Students’ perceptions of rubric-referenced peer feedback on EFL writing: A longitudinal inquiry, Assessing Writing, 19, 80, 10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.008 Wen, 2008, Online peer assessment in an inservice science and mathematics teacher education course, Teaching in Higher Education, 13, 55, 10.1080/13562510701794050 Yao, 2020, How university EFL writers’ beliefs in writing ability impact their perceptions of peer assessment: Perspectives from implicit theories of intelligence, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46, 1 Yi, 2020, Learner interactions in face-to-face collaborative writing with the support of online resources, ReCALL: The Journal of EUROCALL, 32, 85, 10.1017/S0958344019000120 Yu, 2016, Can higher-proficiency L2 learners benefit from working with lower-proficiency partners in peer feedback?, Teaching in Higher Education, 22, 178, 10.1080/13562517.2016.1221806 Zamel, 1982, Writing: The process of discovering meaning, TESOL Quarterly, 16, 195, 10.2307/3586792 Zhang, 2012, A study of English writing and domain-specific motivation and self-efficacy of Chines EFL learners, Pan Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 16, 101