To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aljaafreh, 1994, Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development, The Modern Language Journal, 78, 465, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02064.x
Anton, 1998, Sociocognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom, Canadian Modern Language Journal, 54, 314, 10.3138/cmlr.54.3.314
Beach, 1989, Showing students how to assess: Demonstrating techniques for response in the writing conference, 127
Bell, 1991, Using peer response groups in ESL writing classes, TESL Canada Journal, 8, 65, 10.18806/tesl.v8i2.589
Braine, 2003, From a teacher-centered to a student-centered approach: A study of peer feedback in Hong Kong writing classes, Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 13, 269, 10.1075/japc.13.2.05bra
Bruffee, 1973, Collaborative learning: Some practical models, College English, 34, 634, 10.2307/375331
Bruffee, 1978, The Brooklyn Plan: Attaining intellectual growth through peer-group tutoring, Liberal Education, 64, 447
Butler, S. (1981). The bridge to real writing: Teaching editing skills. Presented at the University of British Columbia. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED228639).
Carson, 1994, Writing groups: Cross-cultural issues, Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 17, 10.1016/1060-3743(94)90003-5
De Guerrero, 2000, Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision, The Modern Language Journal, 84, 51, 10.1111/0026-7902.00052
Ferris, 2003
Gebhardt, 1980, Teamwork and feedback: Broadening the base of collaborative writing, College English, 42, 69, 10.2307/376038
Gieve, 1998, Comments on Dwight Atkinson's “A critical approach to critical thinking in TESOL.”, TESOL Quarterly, 32, 123, 10.2307/3587907
Graner, 1987, Revision workshops: An alternative to peer editing groups, The English Journal, 76, 40, 10.2307/818540
Hansen, 2005, Guiding principles for effective peer response, ELT Journal, 59, 31, 10.1093/elt/cci004
Hyland, 2000, ESL writers and feedback: Giving more autonomy to students, Language Testing Research, 4, 33, 10.1177/136216880000400103
Kamimura, 2006, Effects of peer feedback on EFL student writers at different levels of English proficiency: A Japanese context, TESL Canada Journal, 23, 12, 10.18806/tesl.v23i2.53
Krashen, 1982
Lee, 1997, Peer reviews in Hong Kong tertiary classroom, TESL Canada Journal, 15, 58, 10.18806/tesl.v15i1.692
Lockhart, 1995, Analyzing talk in ESL peer response groups: Stances, functions, and content, Language Learning, 45, 605, 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00456.x
Lynch, 1998, Using G-theory and Many-facet Rasch measurement in the development of performance assessments of the ESL speaking skills of immigrants, Language Testing, 15, 158, 10.1177/026553229801500202
Mangelsdorf, 1992, Peer reviews in the ESL composition classroom: What do the students think?, ELT Journal, 46, 274, 10.1093/elt/46.3.274
Marcus, 1984, The writing center: Peer tutoring in a supportive setting, The English Journal, 73, 66, 10.2307/816981
Matsuhashi, 1989, A theoretical framework for studying peer tutoring as response, 293
McMurry, A. I. (2004). Preparing students for peer review. Unpublished master's project. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.
Mendonça, 1994, Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction, TESOL Quarterly, 28, 745, 10.2307/3587558
Min, 2005, Training students to become successful peer reviewers, System, 33, 293, 10.1016/j.system.2004.11.003
Min, 2006, The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality, Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 118, 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003
Nassaji, 2000, A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles, Language Awareness, 9, 34, 10.1080/09658410008667135
Nelson, 1992, An L2 writing group: Talk and social dimension, Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 171, 10.1016/1060-3743(92)90002-7
O’Donnell, C. (1980, March). Peer editing: A way to improve writing. Paper presented at the meeting of the combined annual meeting of the Secondary School English Conference and the Conference on English Education, Omaha, NE.
Park, T. (2004). An investigation of an ESL placement test of writing using multi-faceted Rasch measurement. Teachers College, Columbia University working papers in TESOL and applied linguistics, 4, pp. 1–21.
Paulus, 1999, The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing, Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 265, 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80117-9
Ramanthan, 1999, Individualism, academic writing, and ESL writers, Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 45, 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80112-X
Rollinson, 2005, Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class, ELT Journal, 59, 23, 10.1093/elt/cci003
Sager, C. (1973, November). Improving the quality of written composition through pupil use of rating scale. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of English, Philadelphia, PA.
Schaffer, 1996, Peer response that works, Journal of Teaching Writing, 15, 81
Sullivan, 2002, Self-assessment in autonomous computer-aided second language writing, ELT Journal, 56, 258, 10.1093/elt/56.3.258
Swain, 2002, Peer-peer dialogue as a means of second language learning, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 171, 10.1017/S0267190502000090
Teo, 2006, Social-interactive writing for English language learners, The CATESOL Journal, 18, 160
Thompson, 2002, Teaching critical thinking in EAP courses in Australia, TESOL Journal, 11, 15, 10.1002/j.1949-3533.2002.tb00104.x
Vygotsky, 1986
Warwick, 2003, Scaffolding speech and writing in the primary classroom: A consideration of work with literature and science pupil groups in the USA and UK, Reading Literacy and Language, 37, 54, 10.1111/1467-9345.3702003
Winsteps (2008). Winsteps, facets: Rasch analysis software. Retreived September 2, 2006, from www.winsteps.com.