Những tầm nhìn thay đổi bị cản trở: quyền lực và nhân khẩu học trong các quán sửa chữa và quá trình chuyển đổi bền vững đô thị
Tóm tắt
Các sáng kiến bền vững, chẳng hạn như các quán sửa chữa (Repair Cafes), là những địa điểm đổi mới có tiềm năng góp phần vào một quá trình chuyển đổi bền vững tại các đô thị. Sử dụng khung phân tích đa cấp, chúng tôi khám phá tầm nhìn về sự thay đổi của 12 quán sửa chữa ở Berlin để hiểu cách mà các thành viên tin rằng phong trào có thể tạo ra sự thay đổi. Chúng tôi phân tích động lực và nhân khẩu học của các nhóm người dùng khác nhau trong các quán sửa chữa để hiểu ai có tiếng nói trong đó. Chúng tôi nhận thấy rằng các quán sửa chữa có hai tầm nhìn chính về sự thay đổi mà yêu cầu sự tham gia rộng rãi. Tuy nhiên, chúng tôi cũng phát hiện rằng sự phân biệt ngầm từ các tình nguyện viên 'chuyên gia' kỹ thuật đã làm nản lòng sự tham gia của phụ nữ và các tầng lớp xã hội thấp hơn. Kiến thức rằng các quán sửa chữa không nhất quán trong các tầm nhìn về sự thay đổi mà họ tuyên bố và các thực hành của họ có những hệ luỵ đối với vai trò của họ trong các quá trình chuyển đổi bền vững đô thị.
Từ khóa
#sự đổi mới #quán sửa chữa #chuyển đổi bền vững đô thị #phân tích đa cấp #nhân khẩu họcTài liệu tham khảo
Anderson C, Denich M, Warchold A, Kropp JP, Pradhan P. A causal systems model to understand interactions among the sustainable development goals. Sustain Sci. 2021.
Argüelles L, Anguelovski I, Dinnie E. Power and privilege in alternative civic practices: examining imaginaries of change and embedded rationalities in community economies. Geoforum. 2017;86:30–41.
Avelino F, Rotmans J. Power in transition: an interdisciplinary framework to study power in relation to structural change. Eur J Soc Theory. 2009;12(4):543–69.
Becker SL, Franke F, Gläsel A. Regime pressures and organizational forms of community-based sustainability initiatives. Environ Innov Soc Transit. 2018;29:5–16.
Becker SL. From regimes to grassroots innovations: a framework for understanding the causes of the barriers to community-based initiatives and their impacts on transitions: PhD diss., University of Potsdam; 2017.
Boyer RHW. Grassroots innovation for urban sustainability: comparing the diffusion pathways of three ecovillage projects. Environ Plan A. 2015;47(2):320–37.
Bryant WK, Jeon-Slaughter H, Kang H, Tax A. Participation in philanthropic activities: donating money and time. J Consum Policy. 2003;26(1):43–73.
Bufkin JL. Bias crime as gendered behavior. Soc Justice. 1999;26(1 (75)):155–76.
Celata F, Dinnie L, Holsten A. Sustainability transitions to low-carbon societies: insights from European community-based initiatives; 2019. p. 909–12.
Connell RW, Messerschmidt JW. Hegemonic masculinity: rethinking the concept. Gend Soc. 2005;19(6):829–59.
Devine-Wright P. Think global, act local? The relevance of place attachments and place identities in a climate changed world. Glob Environ Chang. 2013;23(1):61–9.
Faulkner W. The power and the pleasure? A research agenda for “making gender stick” to engineers. Sci Technol Hum Values. 2000;25(1):87–119.
Flick U, von Kardorff E, Steinke I. Qualitative forschung. Theorie, Methoden, Anwendung in Psychologie und Sozialwissenschaften. Reinbek: Rowohlt; 2010. p. 227.
Fuenfschilling L, Frantzeskaki N, Coenen L. Urban experimentation & sustainability transitions; 2019. p. 219–28.
Geels FW. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res Policy. 2002;31(8-9):1257–74.
Geels FW. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Res Policy. 2004;33(6-7):897–920.
Geels FW. The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms. Environ Innov Soc Transit. 2011;1(1):24–40.
Geels FW. Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory Cult Soc. 2014;31(5):21–40.
Glaser BG. Doing grounded theory: issues and discussions: Sociology Press; 1998.
Glaser BG. All is data. Grounded Theory Rev. 2007;6(2):1–22.
Grin J, Rotmans J, Schot J. Transitions to sustainable development: new directions in the study of long term transformative change: Routledge; 2010.
Grineski SE, Collins TW, Ford P, Fitzgerald R, Aldouri R, Velázquez-Angulo G, et al. Climate change and environmental injustice in a bi-national context. Appl Geogr. 2012;33:25–35.
Hargreaves, Tom, Alex Haxeltine, Noel Longhurst, Gill Seyfang (2011). Sustainability transitions from the bottom-up: civil society, the multi-level perspective and practice theory. No. 2011-01. CSERGE working paper.
Hemmati M, Rohr U. A huge challenge and a narrow discourse-ain’t no space for gender in climate change policy? Women Environ Int Mag. 2007;74:5.
Herrero M, et al. Articulating the effect of food systems innovation on the sustainable development goals. Lancet Planet Health. 2020.
Kannengießer S. Repair Cafés as communicative figurations: consumer-critical media practices for cultural transformation. In: Communicative figurations. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan; 2018. p. 101–22.
Landholm DM, et al. Climate change mitigation potential of community-based initiatives in Europe. Reg Environ Chang. 2019;19(4):927–38.
Lavy V, Sand E. On the origins of gender human capital gaps: short and long term consequences of teachers’ stereotypical biases. No. w20909: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2015.
Lupton E. Mechanical brides: women and machines from home to office: Princeton Architectural Press; 1993.
Markard J, Truffer B. Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: towards an integrated framework. Res Policy. 2008;37(4):596–615.
Mellström U. Patriarchal machines and masculine embodiment. Sci Technol Hum Values. 2002;27(4):460–78.
Mesch DJ, Rooney PM, Steinberg KS, Denton B. The effects of race, gender, and marital status on giving and volunteering in Indiana. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q. 2006;35(4):565–87.
Messerschmidt J. Crime as structured action: gender, race, class, and crime in the making: Sage; 1997.
Messner MA. Power at play: sports and the problem of masculinity: Beacon Press; 1992.
Musick MA, Wilson J, Bynum WB Jr. Race and formal volunteering: the differential effects of class and religion. Soc Forces. 2000;78(4):1539–70.
Netzwek Reparatur-Initiativen (2017). Gesamtübersicht Initiativen. Reparatur-Initiativen. https://www.reparatur-initiativen.de/seite/ueber-uns/. Accessed 5 May 2017.
Oldenziel R. Making technology masculine: men, women and modern machines in America: Amsterdam University Press; 1999. p. 1870–945.
Oudshoorn N, Rommes E, Stienstra M. Configuring the user as everybody: gender and design cultures in information and communication technologies. Sci Technol Hum Values. 2004;29(1):30–63.
Remap (2018). Dein Weg zu Zero Waste. https://www.remap-berlin.de. Accessed 12 Jan 2018.
Rosner DK. Making citizens, reassembling devices: on gender and the development of contemporary public sites of repair in northern California. Publ Cult. 2014;26(1 (72)):51–77.
Rotmans J, Kemp R, Van Asselt M. More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy. Foresight. 2001;3(1):15–31.
Schäfer M, et al. Facilitating low-carbon living? A comparison of intervention measures in different community-based initiatives. Sustainability. 2018;10(4):1047.
Schippers M. Recovering the feminine other: masculinity, femininity, and gender hegemony. Theory Soc. 2007;36(1):85–102.
Sekulova F, et al. A ‘fertile soil’ for sustainability-related community initiatives: a new analytical framework. Environ Plan A. 2017;49(10):2362–82.
Seyfang G. Community action for sustainable housing: building a low-carbon future. Energy Policy. 2010;38(12):7624–33.
Seyfang G, Haxeltine A. Growing grassroots innovations: exploring the role of community-based initiatives in governing sustainable energy transitions; 2012. p. 381–400.
Seyfang G, Longhurst N. Desperately seeking niches: grassroots innovations and niche development in the community currency field. Glob Environ Chang. 2013;23(5):881–91.
Seyfang G, Smith A. Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: towards a new research and policy agenda. Environ Polit. 2007;16(4):584–603.
Smith A. Transforming technological regimes for sustainable development: a role for alternative technology niches? Sci Public Policy. 2003;30(2):127–35.
Smith A. Translating sustainabilities between green niches and socio-technical regimes. Tech Anal Strat Manag. 2007;19(4):427–50.
Smith A, Raven R. What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Res Policy. 2012;41(6):1025–36.
Smith A. The transition town network: a review of current evolutions and renaissance. Soc Mov Stud. 2011;10(01):99–105.
Steinberg KS, Rooney PM, Chin W. Measurement of volunteering: a methodological study using Indiana as a test case. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q. 2002;31(4):484–501.
Stitching Repair Café (2017). About Repair Café. Available online at: https://repaircafe.org/de/. Accessed 7 Feb 2017.
Taniguchi H. Men’s and women’s volunteering: gender differences in the effects of employment and family characteristics. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q. 2006;35(1):83–101.
Verbong G, Geels F. The ongoing energy transition: lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960–2004). Energy Policy. 2007;35(2):1025–37.
Zékány É, Cerwonka A. The gendered geek: performing masculinities in cyberspace. Unpublished Masters Dissertation. Budapest: Central European University; 2011.