Những tầm nhìn thay đổi bị cản trở: quyền lực và nhân khẩu học trong các quán sửa chữa và quá trình chuyển đổi bền vững đô thị
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
#sự đổi mới #quán sửa chữa #chuyển đổi bền vững đô thị #phân tích đa cấp #nhân khẩu họcTài liệu tham khảo
Anderson C, Denich M, Warchold A, Kropp JP, Pradhan P. A causal systems model to understand interactions among the sustainable development goals. Sustain Sci. 2021.
Argüelles L, Anguelovski I, Dinnie E. Power and privilege in alternative civic practices: examining imaginaries of change and embedded rationalities in community economies. Geoforum. 2017;86:30–41.
Avelino F, Rotmans J. Power in transition: an interdisciplinary framework to study power in relation to structural change. Eur J Soc Theory. 2009;12(4):543–69.
Becker SL, Franke F, Gläsel A. Regime pressures and organizational forms of community-based sustainability initiatives. Environ Innov Soc Transit. 2018;29:5–16.
Becker SL. From regimes to grassroots innovations: a framework for understanding the causes of the barriers to community-based initiatives and their impacts on transitions: PhD diss., University of Potsdam; 2017.
Boyer RHW. Grassroots innovation for urban sustainability: comparing the diffusion pathways of three ecovillage projects. Environ Plan A. 2015;47(2):320–37.
Bryant WK, Jeon-Slaughter H, Kang H, Tax A. Participation in philanthropic activities: donating money and time. J Consum Policy. 2003;26(1):43–73.
Bufkin JL. Bias crime as gendered behavior. Soc Justice. 1999;26(1 (75)):155–76.
Celata F, Dinnie L, Holsten A. Sustainability transitions to low-carbon societies: insights from European community-based initiatives; 2019. p. 909–12.
Connell RW, Messerschmidt JW. Hegemonic masculinity: rethinking the concept. Gend Soc. 2005;19(6):829–59.
Devine-Wright P. Think global, act local? The relevance of place attachments and place identities in a climate changed world. Glob Environ Chang. 2013;23(1):61–9.
Faulkner W. The power and the pleasure? A research agenda for “making gender stick” to engineers. Sci Technol Hum Values. 2000;25(1):87–119.
Flick U, von Kardorff E, Steinke I. Qualitative forschung. Theorie, Methoden, Anwendung in Psychologie und Sozialwissenschaften. Reinbek: Rowohlt; 2010. p. 227.
Fuenfschilling L, Frantzeskaki N, Coenen L. Urban experimentation & sustainability transitions; 2019. p. 219–28.
Geels FW. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res Policy. 2002;31(8-9):1257–74.
Geels FW. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Res Policy. 2004;33(6-7):897–920.
Geels FW. The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms. Environ Innov Soc Transit. 2011;1(1):24–40.
Geels FW. Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory Cult Soc. 2014;31(5):21–40.
Glaser BG. Doing grounded theory: issues and discussions: Sociology Press; 1998.
Glaser BG. All is data. Grounded Theory Rev. 2007;6(2):1–22.
Grin J, Rotmans J, Schot J. Transitions to sustainable development: new directions in the study of long term transformative change: Routledge; 2010.
Grineski SE, Collins TW, Ford P, Fitzgerald R, Aldouri R, Velázquez-Angulo G, et al. Climate change and environmental injustice in a bi-national context. Appl Geogr. 2012;33:25–35.
Hargreaves, Tom, Alex Haxeltine, Noel Longhurst, Gill Seyfang (2011). Sustainability transitions from the bottom-up: civil society, the multi-level perspective and practice theory. No. 2011-01. CSERGE working paper.
Hemmati M, Rohr U. A huge challenge and a narrow discourse-ain’t no space for gender in climate change policy? Women Environ Int Mag. 2007;74:5.
Herrero M, et al. Articulating the effect of food systems innovation on the sustainable development goals. Lancet Planet Health. 2020.
Kannengießer S. Repair Cafés as communicative figurations: consumer-critical media practices for cultural transformation. In: Communicative figurations. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan; 2018. p. 101–22.
Landholm DM, et al. Climate change mitigation potential of community-based initiatives in Europe. Reg Environ Chang. 2019;19(4):927–38.
Lavy V, Sand E. On the origins of gender human capital gaps: short and long term consequences of teachers’ stereotypical biases. No. w20909: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2015.
Lupton E. Mechanical brides: women and machines from home to office: Princeton Architectural Press; 1993.
Markard J, Truffer B. Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: towards an integrated framework. Res Policy. 2008;37(4):596–615.
Mellström U. Patriarchal machines and masculine embodiment. Sci Technol Hum Values. 2002;27(4):460–78.
Mesch DJ, Rooney PM, Steinberg KS, Denton B. The effects of race, gender, and marital status on giving and volunteering in Indiana. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q. 2006;35(4):565–87.
Messerschmidt J. Crime as structured action: gender, race, class, and crime in the making: Sage; 1997.
Messner MA. Power at play: sports and the problem of masculinity: Beacon Press; 1992.
Musick MA, Wilson J, Bynum WB Jr. Race and formal volunteering: the differential effects of class and religion. Soc Forces. 2000;78(4):1539–70.
Netzwek Reparatur-Initiativen (2017). Gesamtübersicht Initiativen. Reparatur-Initiativen. https://www.reparatur-initiativen.de/seite/ueber-uns/. Accessed 5 May 2017.
Oldenziel R. Making technology masculine: men, women and modern machines in America: Amsterdam University Press; 1999. p. 1870–945.
Oudshoorn N, Rommes E, Stienstra M. Configuring the user as everybody: gender and design cultures in information and communication technologies. Sci Technol Hum Values. 2004;29(1):30–63.
Remap (2018). Dein Weg zu Zero Waste. https://www.remap-berlin.de. Accessed 12 Jan 2018.
Rosner DK. Making citizens, reassembling devices: on gender and the development of contemporary public sites of repair in northern California. Publ Cult. 2014;26(1 (72)):51–77.
Rotmans J, Kemp R, Van Asselt M. More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy. Foresight. 2001;3(1):15–31.
Schäfer M, et al. Facilitating low-carbon living? A comparison of intervention measures in different community-based initiatives. Sustainability. 2018;10(4):1047.
Schippers M. Recovering the feminine other: masculinity, femininity, and gender hegemony. Theory Soc. 2007;36(1):85–102.
Sekulova F, et al. A ‘fertile soil’ for sustainability-related community initiatives: a new analytical framework. Environ Plan A. 2017;49(10):2362–82.
Seyfang G. Community action for sustainable housing: building a low-carbon future. Energy Policy. 2010;38(12):7624–33.
Seyfang G, Haxeltine A. Growing grassroots innovations: exploring the role of community-based initiatives in governing sustainable energy transitions; 2012. p. 381–400.
Seyfang G, Longhurst N. Desperately seeking niches: grassroots innovations and niche development in the community currency field. Glob Environ Chang. 2013;23(5):881–91.
Seyfang G, Smith A. Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: towards a new research and policy agenda. Environ Polit. 2007;16(4):584–603.
Smith A. Transforming technological regimes for sustainable development: a role for alternative technology niches? Sci Public Policy. 2003;30(2):127–35.
Smith A. Translating sustainabilities between green niches and socio-technical regimes. Tech Anal Strat Manag. 2007;19(4):427–50.
Smith A, Raven R. What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Res Policy. 2012;41(6):1025–36.
Smith A. The transition town network: a review of current evolutions and renaissance. Soc Mov Stud. 2011;10(01):99–105.
Steinberg KS, Rooney PM, Chin W. Measurement of volunteering: a methodological study using Indiana as a test case. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q. 2002;31(4):484–501.
Stitching Repair Café (2017). About Repair Café. Available online at: https://repaircafe.org/de/. Accessed 7 Feb 2017.
Taniguchi H. Men’s and women’s volunteering: gender differences in the effects of employment and family characteristics. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q. 2006;35(1):83–101.
Verbong G, Geels F. The ongoing energy transition: lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960–2004). Energy Policy. 2007;35(2):1025–37.
Zékány É, Cerwonka A. The gendered geek: performing masculinities in cyberspace. Unpublished Masters Dissertation. Budapest: Central European University; 2011.