Three-dimensional molar enamel distribution and thickness in Australopithecus and Paranthropus

Biology Letters - Tập 4 Số 4 - Trang 406-410 - 2008
Anthony J. Olejniczak1, Tanya M. Smith1, Matthew M. Skinner1, Frederick E. Grine2,3, Robin N. M. Feeney1, J. Francis Thackeray4, Jean‐Jacques Hublin1
1Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology04103 Leipzig, Germany
2Departments of Anthropology and Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook UniversityStony Brook, NY 11794, USA
3Leverhulme Centre for Human Evolutionary Studies, The University of CambridgeFitzwilliam Street, Cambridge CB2 1QH, UK
4Human Origins and Past Environments Programme, Transvaal MuseumPaul Kruger Street, Box 413 Pretoria, Gauteng 0001, South Africa

Tóm tắt

Thick molar enamel is among the few diagnostic characters of hominins which are measurable in fossil specimens. Despite a long history of study and characterization of Paranthropus molars as relatively ‘hyper-thick’, only a few tooth fragments and controlled planes of section (designed to be proxies of whole-crown thickness) have been measured. Here, we measure molar enamel thickness in Australopithecus africanus and Paranthropus robustus using accurate microtomographic methods, recording the whole-crown distribution of enamel. Both taxa have relatively thick enamel, but are thinner than previously characterized based on two-dimensional measurements. Three-dimensional measurements show that P. robustus enamel is not hyper-thick, and A. africanus enamel is relatively thinner than that of recent humans. Interspecific differences in the whole-crown distribution of enamel thickness influence cross-sectional measurements such that enamel thickness is exaggerated in two-dimensional sections of A. africanus and P. robustus molars. As such, two-dimensional enamel thickness measurements in australopiths are not reliable proxies for the three-dimensional data they are meant to represent. The three-dimensional distribution of enamel thickness shows different patterns among species, and is more useful for the interpretation of functional adaptations than single summary measures of enamel thickness.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1002/ajpa.1330700205

10.1038/nature00879

Grine F.E, 1988, Evolutionary history of the “robust” australopithecines, 3

10.1537/ase.03106

10.1038/35068500

10.1002/bies.20729

Macchiarelli R, 2004, Early pliocene hominid tooth from Galili, Somali region, Ethiopia, Coll. Antropol, 28, 65

10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199906)109:2<211::AID-AJPA6>3.0.CO;2-B

10.1002/ajpa.1330890202

10.1038/314260a0

10.1002/ar.a.20307

10.1002/ajpa.20711

10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.09.014

10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.11.004

10.1006/jhev.1998.0239

10.1038/nature03822

Senut B, 2001, First hominid from the Miocene (Lukeino Formation, Kenya), Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci. Ser. II-A, 332, 137

10.1016/j.jhevol.2005.02.004

Smith T.M, 2006, Molar crown thickness, volume, and development in South African Middle Stone Age humans, S. Afr. J. Sci, 102, 513

10.1073/pnas.0700747104

10.1006/jhev.1996.0097

10.1537/ase.050118

10.1038/nature06113

Tafforeau P. 2004 Phylogenetic and functional aspects of tooth enamel microstructure and three-dimensional structure of modern and fossil primate molars. Ph.D. dissertation Université de Montpellier II.

10.1371/journal.pone.0002044

10.1038/371306a0

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Biology Letters

Tập 4 Số 4

406-410

Thông tin tác giả