Three‐chamber Bioelectrochemical System for Biogas Upgrading and Nutrient Recovery

Fuel Cells - Tập 17 Số 5 - Trang 593-600 - 2017
Marco Zeppilli1, Alessio Mattia1, Marianna Villano1, Mauro Majone1
1Sapienza University of Rome, Department of Chemistry, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy

Tóm tắt

AbstractHere, an innovative three‐chamber bioelectrochemical system configuration is proposed to combine COD, CO2 and NH4+ removal into a single device. In the proposed process, while COD oxidation and CO2 reduction occurred, respectively, in the anodic and cathodic chamber, the consequent current generation promoted the migration of target ionic species towards an intermediate accumulation chamber, across cation and anion exchange membranes, respectively. Under this configuration, COD removal proceeded in the anode chamber with an average removal rate of 841 mgCOD L−1 d−1 while the cathode was able to remove 2.1 gCO2 L−1 d−1 and produce 60 meq L−1 d−1 of CH4. Around 90% of the removed CO2 was contained in the concentrated spill (at around 20 g L−1 of bicarbonate), which was recovered from the intermediate accumulation chamber and also contained the removed nitrogen as ammonium ion (around 32% removal and around 4‐fold concentration with respect to the anode influent). Methane generation allowed a partial recovery of energy of overall energy consumption costs of both COD and CO2 removal. This study confirms the possibility to combine three processes into a single bioelectrochemical device.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1039/C4CP00173G

Erisman J. W., 2013, Source Separation and Decentralization for Wastewater Management. London: IWA Publishing, 45

Mulder A., 2003, Water Science and Technology, 48, 67, 10.2166/wst.2003.0018

10.1021/es0605016

10.1126/science.1217412

10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.100

10.1016/j.biortech.2012.11.080

10.1038/srep15744

10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00024

10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.046

10.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.017

Villano M., 2012, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 27, 109

10.1021/es803531g

10.1016/0196-8904(95)00122-T

Zeppilli M., 2016, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 49, 445

10.1007/BF00871640

Balch W. E., 1979, Microbiological Reviews, 43, 260, 10.1128/mr.43.2.260-296.1979

10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.127

10.1039/C5RA09039C

Bauer F., 2013, SGC Rapport, 270, 50

10.2166/wst.2008.043

10.1016/j.cej.2016.06.020

10.1021/es901950j

Zeikus J. G., 1977, Bacteriological Reviews, 41, 514, 10.1128/br.41.2.514-541.1977

Thauer R. K., 1977, Bacteriological Reviews, 41, 100, 10.1128/br.41.1.100-180.1977

10.1007/s11356-014-3158-3

10.1016/j.bioelechem.2015.07.008

10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.011

Thran D., 2014, IEA Task 40 and Task 37 Joint Study, 39

Petersson A., 2009, IEA Bioenergy, 20, 10

10.1016/S0273-1223(98)00413-2

10.1016/j.watres.2014.07.025