The webcam and student engagement in synchronous online learning: visually or verbally?

Akcaoglu, M., & Lee, E. (2016). Increasing social presence in online learning through small group discussions. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2293 Al-Samarraie, H. (2019). A scoping review of videoconferencing systems in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.4037 Altbach, P.G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. A Report Prepared for the UNESCO 2009 World Conference on Higher Education. http://atepie.cep.edu.rs/public/Altbach,_Reisberg,_Rumbley_Tracking_an_Academic_Revolution,_UNESCO_2009.pdf An, Y.-J., & Frick, T. (2006). Student perceptions of asynchronous computer-mediated communication in face-to-face courses. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 485–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00023.x Andel, S. A., de Vreede, T., Spector, P. E., Padmanabhan, B., Singh, V. K., & De Vreede, G. J. (2020). Do social features help in video-centric online learning platforms? A social presence perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 113, 106505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106505 Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 25, 297–308. Autor:innengruppe AEDiL (2021). Corona-Semester reflektiert. Einblicke einer kollaborativen Autoethnographie [Corona semester reflected. Insights of a collaborative autoethnography]. wbv Media. https://doi.org/10.3278/6004820w Ayala, J. C., & Manzano, G. (2018). Academic performance of first-year university students: The influence of resilience and engagement. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(7), 1321–1335. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1502258 Bedenlier, S., Wunder, I., Gläser-Zikuda, M., Kammerl, R., Kopp, B., Ziegler, A., & Händel., M. (2021). “Generation invisible?”. Higher education students’ (non)use of webcams in synchronous online learning. International Journal of Educational Research Open. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100068 Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marin, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8 Bower, M. (2016). Deriving a typology of Web 2 learning technologies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47, 763–777. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12344 Bower, M. (2017). Design of technology-enhanced learning: Integrating research and practice. Emerald Publishing Limited. Bozkurt, A., Koutropoulos, A., Singh, L., & Honeychurch, S. (2020). On lurking: Multiple perspectives on lurking within an educational community. The Internet and Higher Education, 44,. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100709 Bui, T. H., Luong, D. H., Nguyen, X. A., Nguyen, H. L., & Ngo, T. T. (2020). Impact of female students’ perceptions on behavioral intention to use video conferencing tools in COVID-19: Data of Vietnam. Data in Brief, 32, 106142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.106142 Büchele, S. (2020). Evaluating the link between attendance and performance in higher education: The role of classroom engagement dimensions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(1), 132–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1754330 Burchfield, C. M., & Sappington, J. (1999). Participation in classroom discussion. Teaching of Psychology, 26(4), 290–291. Butz, N. T., Stupnisky, R. H., & Pekrun, R. (2015). Students’ emotions for achievement and technology use in synchronous hybrid graduate programmes: A control-value approach. Research in Learning Technology, 23,. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.26097 Candarli, D., & Yuksel, H. G. (2012). Students’ perceptions of video-conferencing in the classrooms in higher education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 357–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.663 Castelli, F. R., & Sarvary, M. A. (2021). Why students do not turn their video cameras during online classes and an equitable and inclusive plan to encourage them to do so. Ecology and Evolution, 11(8), 3565–3576. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7123 Chen, H.-R. (2012). Assessment of learners’ attention to e-learning by monitoring facial expressions for computer network courses. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 47(4), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.2190/ec.47.4.b Chen, H.-R. & Chen, J.-H. (2015). Design of attention-based recommendation learning mechanism in the cloud computing environment. 15th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1109/icalt.2015.91 Chen, J. C., Dobinson, T., & Kent, S. (2020). Lecturers’ perceptions and experiences of Blackboard Collaborate as a distance learning and teaching tool via Open Universities Australia (OUA). Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 35(3), 222–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2019.1688654 Christensen, C. M., & Eyring, H. J. (2011). The innovative university: Changing the DNA of higher education from the inside out. Jossey-Bass. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator’s solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard University Press. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum. Correia, A.-P., Liu, C., & Xu, F. (2020). Evaluating videoconferencing systems for the quality of the educational experience. Distance Education, 41(4), 429–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1821607 Dalelio, C. M. (2013). Student participation in online discussion boards in a higher education setting. International Journal on E-Learning, 12(3), 249–271. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 de Souza Rodrigues, M. A., Chimenti, P., & Nogueira, A. R. R. (2021). An exploration of eLearning adoption in the educational ecosystem. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 585–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10276-3 Díaz, S. R., Swan, K., Ice, P., & Kupczynski, L. (2010). Student ratings of the importance of survey items, multiplicative factor analysis, and the validity of the community of inquiry survey. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.11.004 D’Mello, S. K. (2017). Emotional learning analytics. In C. Lang, G. Siemens, A. Wise, & D. Gašević, (Eds.), The handbook of learning analytics (pp. 115–127). Society for Learning Analytics Research. https://doi.org/10.18608/hla17 Edelmann, N. (2013). Reviewing the definitions of “lurkers” and some implications for online research. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(9), 645–649. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0362 Eng, N. (2020). Should students show their faces on Zoom? Norman Eng. 10x your teaching. https://normaneng.org/should-students-show-their-faces-on-zoom/. Fan, Z., Xu, J., Liu, W., Liu, F., & Cheng, W. (2016). Kinect-based dynamic head pose recognition in online courses. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Advanced Information Management, Communicates, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IMCEC), Xi’an, China. Fatani, T. H. (2020). Student satisfaction with videoconferencing teaching quality during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 396. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02310-2 Flavin, M. (2012). Disruptive technologies in higher education. Research in Learning Technology, 20. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.19184 Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002 Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. S. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002 Gerbic, P. (2006). To post or not to post: Undergraduate student perceptions about participating in online discussions. In L. Markauskaite, P. Goodyear, P., & P. Reimann (Eds.), Who's learning? Whose technology? Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 271–281). Sydney University Press. Gherheş, V., Şimon, S., & Para, I. (2021). Analysing students’ reasons for keeping their webcams on or off during online classes. Sustainability, 13(6), 3203. Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., & Gijselaers, W. (2013). Investigating the relations between motivation, tool use, participation, and performance in an e-learning course using web-videoconferencing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.09.005 Gillies, D. (2008). Student perspectives on videoconferencing in teacher education at a distance. Distance Education, 29(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910802004878 Graesser, A. C. (2019). Emotions are the experiential glue of learning environments in the 21st century. Learning and Instruction, 70, 101212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.05.009 Händel, M., Bedenlier, S., Gläser-Zikuda, M., Kammerl, R., Kopp, B., & Ziegler, A. (2020a). Do students have the means to learn during the coronavirus pandemic? Student demands for distance learning in a suddenly digital landscape. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/5ngm9 Händel, M., Stephan, M., Gläser-Zikuda, M., Kopp, K., Bedenlier, S., & Ziegler, A. (2020b). Digital readiness and its effects on higher education student socio-emotional perceptions in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1846147 Harvard University (2021). Assessing online participation. https://bokcenter.harvard.edu/assessing-online-participation. Hascher, T. (2010). Learning and emotion: Perspectives for theory and research. European Educational Research Journal, 9(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2010.9.1.13 Hrastinski, S. (2008). What is online learner participation? A Literature Review. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1755–1765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.05.005 Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 Ice, P., Curtis, R., Phillips, P., & Wells, J. (2007). Using asynchronous audio feedback to enhance teaching presence and students’ sense of community. Online Learning, 11(2), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v11i2.1724 Isaías, P. (2018). Model for the enhancement of learning in higher education through the deployment of emerging technologies. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 16(4), 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-04-2018-0036 Johnson, M. (2016). Feedback effectiveness in professional learning contexts. Review of Education, 4(2), 195–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3061 Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017). Issues and challenges for teaching successful online courses in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(1), 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516661713 Kahu, E. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505 Kaplan-Rakowski, R. (2020). Addressing students’ emotional needs during the COVID-19 pandemic: A perspective on text versus video feedback in online environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09897-9 Kim, J. (2013). Influence of group size on students’ participation in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 62, 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.025 Kim, J., Kwon, Y., & Cho, D. (2011). Investigating factors that influence social presence and learning outcomes in distance higher education. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1512–1520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.005 Kim, M., Jung, E., De Siqueira, A., & Huber, L. (2016). An investigation into effective pedagogies in a flipped classroom: A case study. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 32(2), 1–15. Kitchin, R. (2014). The data revolution. SAGE Publications. Kozar, O. (2016). Perceptions of webcam use by experienced online teachers and learners: A seeming disconnect between research and practice. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 779–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1061021 Krause, K.-L. (2005). Understanding and promoting student engagement in university learning communities. https://melbourne-cshe.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/1761523/Stud_eng.pdf. Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2008.11772116 Kuh, G. D. & Schneider, C. G. (2008). High-impact practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Association of American Colleges and Universities. https://www.aacu.org/leap/hips. Lajoie, S. P., Pekrun, R., Azevedo, R., & Leighton, J. P. (2020). Understanding and measuring emotions in technology-rich learning environments. Learning and Instruction, 70, 101272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101272 Lashbrook, J. (2010). “Into it” or “going through the motions”: Exploring how college students understand their academic engagement. Sociological Studies of Children and Youth, 13, 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1537-4661(2010)0000013016 Lawson, T., Comber, C., Gage, J., & Cullum-Hanshaw, A. (2010). Images of the future for education? Videoconferencing: A literature review. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(3), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939x.2010.513761 Li, J., Wong, S. C., Yang, X., & Bell, A. (2020). Using feedback to promote student participation in online learning programs: Evidence from a quasi-experimental study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 485–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09709-9 Lin, X., & Gao, L. (2020). Students’ sense of community and perspective of taking synchronous and asynchronous online courses. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 169–179. http://www.asianjde.org/org/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/448. Little, R. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722 Loderer, K., Pekrun, R., & Lester, J. C. (2020). Beyond cold technology: A systematic review and meta-analysis on emotions in technology-based learning environments. Learning and Instruction, 70, 101162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.08.002 Long, T., Cummins, J., & Waugh, M. (2017). Use of the flipped classroom instructional model in higher education: Instructors’ perspectives. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(2), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9119-8 Maimaiti, G., Jia, C., & Hew, K. F. (2021). Student disengagement in web-based videoconferencing supported online learning: An activity theory perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1984949 Marinagi, C., Skourlas, C., & Belsis, P. (2013). Employing ubiquitous computing devices and technologies in the higher education classroom of the future. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 73, 487–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.02.081 Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 159, 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009 McBrien, J. L., Cheng, R., & Jones, P. (2009). Virtual spaces: Employing a synchronous online classroom to facilitate student engagement in online learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.605 Moubayed, A., Injadat, M., Shami, A., & Lutfiyya, H. (2020). Student engagement level in e-learning environment: Clustering using K-means. American Journal of Distance Education, 34(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2020.1696140 Munoz, K. E., Wang, M.-J. (S.), & Tham, A. (2021). Enhancing online learning environments using social presence: Evidence from hospitality online courses during COVID-19. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 21(4), 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313220.2021.1908871 Naujoks, N., Bedenlier, S., Gläser-Zikuda, M., Kammerl, R., Kopp, B., Ziegler, A., & Händel, M. (2021). Self-regulated resource management in emergency remote higher education – Status quo and predictors. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672741 Naveh, G., & Shelef, A. (2021). Analyzing attitudes of students toward the use of technology for learning: Simplicity is the key to successful implementation in higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(2), 382–393. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2020-0204 Ng, K. C. (2007). Replacing face-to-face tutorials by synchronous online technologies: Challenges and pedagogical implications. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v8i1.335. Nilsen, A. G., Almås, A. G., & Krumsvik, R. J. (2013). Teaching online or on-campus? – What students say about desktop videoconferencing. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 8(01–02), 90–106. http://www.idunn.no/dk/2013/01-02/teaching_online_or_on-campus_what_students_say_about_des. O’Conaill, B., Whittakr, S., & Wilbur, S. (1993). Conversations over video conferences: An evaluation of the spoken aspects of video-mediated communication. Human-Computer Interaction, 8, 389–428. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0804_4 Oriol-Granado, X. M., Mendoza-Lira, M., Apablaza, C. G. C., & Molina Lopez, V. M. (2017). Emociones positivas, apoyo a la autonomía y rendimiento de estudiantes universitarios: El papel mediador del compromiso académico y la autoeficacia [Positive emotions, autonomy support and academic performance of university students: The mediating role of academic engagement and self-efficacy]. Revista de Psicodidactica, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1387/RevPsicodidact.14280 Pala, F. K., & Erdem, M. (2020). Development of a participation style scale for online instructional discussions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 3213–3233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09817-x Parks-Stamm, E. J., Zafonte, M., & Palenque, S. M. (2017). The effects of instructor participation and class size on student participation in an online class discussion forum. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48, 1250–1259. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12512 Parsons, J., & Taylor, L. (2011). Improving student engagement. Current Issues in Education, 14(1). https://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/745 Pisutova, K., Rogers, R. C., & Mercer, J. (2018, November). Engaging students at a distance: Advantages and pitfalls of video-conference use in teaching. 16th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETA.2018.8572269. Platt, C. A., Raile, A. N. W., & Yu, N. (2014). Virtually the same? Student perceptions of the equivalence of online classes to face-to-face classes. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(3), 489–503. Quaye, S. J., Harper, S. R., & Pendakur, S. L. (2019). Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations. Routledge. Racheva, V. (2018). Social aspects of synchronous virtual learning environments. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2048, 020032. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5082050 Rajab, M. H., & Soheib, M. (2021). Privacy concerns over the use of webcams in online medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cureus, 13(2), e13536. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.13536 Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guardia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the COVID-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2, 923–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y Redmond, P., Heffernan, A. Abawi, L., Brown, A., & Henderson, R. (2018). An online engagement framework for higher education. Online Learning, 22(1), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175. Reinholz, D. L., Stone-Johnstone, A., White, I., Sianez, L. M., & Shah, N. (2020). A pandemic crash course: Learning to teach equitably in synchronous online classes. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-06-0126 Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Social presence in relation to students’ satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 402–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.001 Rocca, K. A. (2010). Student participation in the college classroom: An extended multidisciplinary literature review. Communication Education, 59(2), 185–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903505936 Ross, M., Graves, C. A., Campbell, J. W., & Kim, J. H. (2013). Using support vector machines to classify student attentiveness for the development of personalized learning systems. 12th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications, Miami, FL, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA.2013.66 Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. Ruthotto, I., Kreth, Q., Melkers, J., Stevens, J., & Clare, T. (2020). Lurking and participation in the virtual classroom: The effects of gender, race, and age among graduate students in computer science. Computers & Education, 151,. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103854 Schwarz, N. (2012). Feelings-as-information theory. In P. Van Lange, A. Kruglanski, & T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 289–308). Sage. Sezer, A., İnel, Y., Seçkin, A. Ç., & Uluçınar, U. (2017). The relationship between attention levels and class participation of first-year students in classroom teaching departments. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), 55–68. Sobaih, A. E. E., Hasanein, A. M., & Abu Elnasr, A. E. (2020). Responses to COVID-19 in higher education: Social media usage for sustaining formal academic communication in developing countries. Sustainability, 12(16), 6520. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166520 Stanford University (2021). 10 strategies for creating inclusive and equitable online learning environments. https://sites.google.com/stanford.edu/10-strategies-for-creating-inc/home. Sun, N., Rau, P. P. L., & Ma, L. (2014). Understanding lurkers in online communities: A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.022 Taylor, J. C. (2002). Teaching and learning online: The workers, the lurkers and the shirkers. Paper presented at the Research in Distance & Adult Learning in Asia: CRIDALA, Hong Kong. Tyng, C. M., Amin, H. U., Saad, M., & Malik, A. S. (2017). The influences of emotion on learning and memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1454. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01454 Vonderwell, S., & Zachariah, S. (2005). Factors that influence participation in online learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(2), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2005.10782457 Vizoso, C., Rodríguez, C., & Arias-Gundín, O. (2018). Coping, academic engagement and performance in university students. Higher Education Research and Development, 37(7), 1515–1529. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1504006 Wang, Y. (2004). Supporting synchronous distance language learning with desktop videoconferencing. Language Learning & Technology, 8, 90–121. Wekerle, C., Daumiller, M., & Kollar, I. (2020). Using digital technology to promote higher education learning: The importance of different learning activities and their relations to learning outcomes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1799455 Whittle, C., Tiwari, S., Yan, S., & Williams, J. (2020). Emergency remote teaching environment: A conceptual framework for responsive online teaching in crises. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(5/6), 311–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0099 Winstone, N., & Carless, D. (2019). Designing effective feedback processes in higher eEducation: A learning-focused approach. Routledge Wright, K. B. (2005). Researching internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00259.x Young, S. B., & Bruce, M. A. (2020). Student and faculty satisfaction: Can distance course delivery measure up to face-to-face courses? Educational Research: Theory and Practice, 31(3), 36–48.