The value revitalization model of Qajar religious schools in Tehran
Tóm tắt
Religious schools are institutions for teaching Islamic sciences. Nowadays, many religious schools in Tehran, which were built during the Qajar period, have been destroyed due to natural erosion and urban expansion. Since there is no comprehensive research on the conservation and revitalization of these schools, the present study aims to model the value revitalization of Qajar religious schools in Tehran. The present research is a mixed-methods study (a qualitative-quantitative study using a simulation). The data required are collected using a questionnaire. The statistical population includes school teachers who complete the structured questionnaire after visiting the schools through a virtual tour. The teachers are selected using a random sampling technique and the sample size (number of participated teachers) is 948. The sampling adequacy is confirmed with the KMO test. The reliability and validity of the questionnaire are also verified by Cronbach's alpha and the model fit index, respectively. The data are analyzed by modeling and path analysis in SPSS and AMOS software. Research results show that architectural phenomena (i.e., independent variable), through value conservation (i.e., mediator variable), have the most significant effect on the value revitalization (i.e., dependent variable) of Qajar religious schools in Tehran. Also, the path analysis shows three essential relations with a large effect size in the model: (1) The conservation of compound values influenced by social interactions in the building revitalizes the semi-tangible aesthetic factor of the building; (2) The conservation of physical values influenced by the building structure revitalizes the tangible aesthetic factor of the building; and (3) The conservation of semantic values influenced by the moral values of the building revitalizes the intangible aesthetic and educational factors of the building. In value revitalization, two basic aesthetic and educational factors play the most important role because they do not influence any other variable while all variables influence them.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Babayi A, Torabi Farsani S, Mirhosaini M. A study of Yazd educational system in the Qajar period. J Hist. 2020;15(58):215–52.
Karahmadi M, Kiani M, Ghasemi Sichani M. Evaluation of Isfahan’s new schools in the Late Qajar and the first Pahlavi periods based on shaping factors and physical components. Mon Sci J Bagh-e Nazar. 2020;17(88):5–18. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2020.190920.4177.
Sobhanimatin A, Latifi M. Identifying the requirements of appropriate communication between mosques and schools. Sci J Islamic Manag. 2020;27(4):53–78.
Hayaty H, Gholami F. Concept of education and its effects on architecture of mosque-schools in qajars era. Technol Educ J. 2019;13(4):743–61. https://doi.org/10.22061/jte.2019.3253.1843.
Hooshyari M, Pournaderi H, Fereshteh Nejad M. Typology of Masjid-Madrasa in the Islamic architecture of Iran, investigating the correlation between educational and devotional spaces. J Iran Arch Stud. 2013;2(3):37–54.
Zamani Z, Heidari S, Hanachi P. Study the microclimatic performance of the courtyard in Tehran climate (case study: Memar Bashi theological seminary courtyard). J Environ Sci Technol. 2020;22(5):27–40.
Soltanzadeh H, Khatibi S, Feli S, Soltanzade A. Location of Theological Schools in Islamic historical cities (case studies: the cities of Qazvin and Isfahan). Hum Geogr Res. 2018;50(2):449–66. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2017.237263.1007493.
Hosseini Alamdari A, Mousavi E, Keramati Sheikholeslami H, Saadatmand M. The typology of the Mosque-Schools of Iran based on the method of access. Mon Sci J Bagh-e Nazar. 2017;14(53):57–68.
Neyestani J, Akbari Z. Similarities and differences in the spatial-functional elements of Tehran’s seminaries in Qajar era. Armanshahr Arch Urban Dev. 2016;8(15):145–55.
Feizolahbeigi A. Analytic and comparative study of physical-historical changes in Haj Rajab Ali Mosque in Tehran city. Knowl Conserv Restor. 2020;3(1):1–18.
Mohseni M. An assessment of the evolution of structural forms of Iranian schools: Seljukid Era into Ghajar period (from the fifth to the fourteenth century AH). JRIA. 2019;7(1):69–88.
Sajadzadeh H, Daryaei R, Ebrahimi M, Mesri S. Interaction by the architecture of the Mosque Qajar period imported west (case study of Tehran Mosque Sepah Salar). pazhoheshha-ye Bastan shenasi Iran. 2017;7(14):221–40. https://doi.org/10.22084/nbsh.2017.9969.1432.
Hayati H, RahmatNia A, Kavarizadeh H. Typology of traditional school architecture with an emphasis on the effect of educational policies. Mon Sci J Bagh-e Nazar. 2020;16(81):63–84. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2019.141198.3691.
Alaghmand S, Salehi S, Mozaffar F. A comparative study of architecture and content of Iran’s schools from the traditional era to the modern era. Mon Sci J Bagh-e Nazar. 2017;14(49):5–20.
Taher-Toloudel MS, Saleh-Sedghpour B, Kamali-Tabrizi S. Impact model of the architectural phenomena on the value-based conservation of the religious-educational buildings of Tehran in the Qajar period. Parseh J Archaeol Stud. 2021;4(14):147–66.
Del MSTT, Sedghpour BS, Tabrizi SK. Factors affecting the value revitalization of Qajar religious schools in Tehran. Herit Sci. 2021;9(1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-021-00526-z.
Read H, Marić S. The meaning of art, vol. 213. Suffolk: Penguin books; 1949.
Giedion S. Space, time and architecture: the growth of a new tradition. J Aesthet Art Crit. 2009. https://doi.org/10.2307/2F426205.
Alemi B, Pourdeihimi S, Mashayekh Faridani S. Structure, form and architecture. J Iran Arch Stud. 2016;5(9):123–40.
Malinin LH. Creative practices embodied, embedded, and enacted in architectural settings: toward an ecological model of creativity. Front Psychol. 2016;6:1978. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01978.
Leon M, Laing R. A concept design stages protocol to support collaborative processes in architecture, engineering and construction projects. J Eng Des Technol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-10-2020-0399.
Hejazi M. Geometry in nature and Persian architecture. Build Environ. 2005;40(10):1413–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.11.007.
Ching FD, Onouye BS, Zuberbuhler D. Building structures illustrated: patterns, systems, and design. Hoboken: Wiley; 2013.
Sandaker BN, Eggen AP, Cruvellier MR. The structural basis of architecture. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge; 2019. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315624501.
Salvadori MG, Heller RA. Structure in architecture: the building of buildings. 1975. https://books.google.com/books/about/Structure_in_Architecture.html?id=lLpRAAAAMAAJ.
Jokilehto J. A history of architectural conservation. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge; 2017. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315636931.
Feilden B. Conservation of historic buildings. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge; 2007. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080502915.
De la Torre M, Throsby D. Assessing the values of cultural heritage. Getty Conservation Institute. Research report, Los Angeles. 2002. https://www.getty.edu/conservation/publications_resources/pdf_publications/pdf/assessing.pdf.
Icomos NZ. ICOMOS New Zealand charter for the conservation of places of cultural heritage value. 2010. https://www.icomos.org/images/DOCUMENTS/Charters/ICOMOS_NZ_Charter_2010_FINAL_11_Oct_2010.pdf.
Del MSTT, Tabrizi SK. A methodological assessment of the importance of physical values in architectural conservation using Shannon entropy method. J Cult Herit. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2019.12.012.
Del MSTT, Sedghpour BS, Tabrizi SK. The semantic conservation of architectural heritage: the missing values. Herit Sci. 2020;8(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-020-00416-w.
Eberhardt S, Pospisil M. EP heritage value assessment method proposed methodology for assessing heritage value of load-bearing structures. Int J Arch Herit. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2021.1901160.
Zhang Y, Dong W. Determining minimum intervention in the preservation of heritage buildings. Int J Arch Herit. 2021;15(5):698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2019.1645237.
Penića M, Svetlana G, Murgul V. Revitalization of historic buildings as an approach to preserve cultural and historical heritage. Proc Eng. 2015;117:883–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.165.
Taherdoost H. Sampling methods in research methodology; how to choose a sampling technique for research. How to choose a sampling technique for research (April 10, 2016). 2016. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205035.
Kim JO, Mueller CW. Factor analysis: statistical methods and practical issues (Vol. 14). Sage. 1978. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=raQzQnbET9QC&oi=fnd&pg=PA5&ots=PZmvJ7luQp&sig=RpQZvsAjbX92F_PMuAu95qA7cs#v=onepage&q&f=false.
Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika. 1974;39(1):31–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575.
Cerny BA, Kaiser HF. A study of a measure of sampling adequacy for factor-analytic correlation matrices. Multivar Behav Res. 1977;12(1):43–7. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1201_3.
Boone HN, Boone DA. Analyzing likert data. J Ext. 2012;50(2):1–5.
Joshi A, Kale S, Chandel S, Pal DK. Likert scale: explored and explained. Curr J Appl Sci Technol. 2015. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975.
Babbie ER. The practice of social research. Thomason/Wadsworth Co. 2007. http://academic.uprm.edu/jayant/class/fl07-soci3265.pdf.
Frey BB. The SAGE encyclopedia of educational research, measurement, and evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2018. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n685.
Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2011;2:53. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
Taber KS. The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res Sci Educ. 2018;48(6):1273–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2.
Flora DB. Your coefficient alpha is probably wrong, but which coefficient omega is right? A tutorial on using R to obtain better reliability estimates. Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci. 2020;3(4):484–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920951747.
Thakkar JJ. Applications of structural equation modelling with AMOS 21, IBM SPSS. In: Thakkar JJ, editor. Structural equation modelling studies in systems, decision and control. Singapore: Springer; 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3793-6_4.
Collier JE. Applied structural equation modeling using AMOS: basic to advanced techniques. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge; 2020. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003018414.
Lleras C. Path analysis. In: Kempf-Leonard K (ed) Encyclopedia of social measurement. Elsevier; 2005. pp 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-369398-5/00483-7.
Purwanto A, Asbari M, Santoso TI, Paramarta V, Sunarsi D. Social and management research quantitative analysis for medium sample: comparing of Lisrel, Tetrad, GSCA, Amos, SmartPLS, WarpPLS, and SPSS. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik. 2020;10(2):518–532. http://103.76.50.195/iap/article/view/22804.
Ho R. Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis and interpretation with SPSS. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2006. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420011111.
Shanthi R. Multivariate data analysis: using SPSS and AMOS. India: MJP Publisher; 2019.
Kenny DA. Measuring model fit. 2015. http://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm.
Henderson JC. Conserving colonial heritage: raffles hotel in Singapore. Int J Herit Stud. 2001;7(1):7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250119383.
Sabri R. Greek nationalism, architectural narratives, and a gymnasium that wasn’t. Int J Herit Stud. 2019;25(2):178–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2018.1431302.
Karlström A. Local heritage and the problem with conservation. 2013. https://doi.org/10.22459/TA36.12.2013.10.
Throsby CD. Paying for the past: economics, cultural heritage, and public policy. Australia’s economy in its international context. 2006. p. 527. https://www.academia.edu/download/65608440/hdl_77746.pdf.
Schiller F, Snell R. On the aesthetic education of man. Courier Corporation; 2004. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=GJb0T939CHEC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=57.%09Schiller,+F.,+%26+Snell,+R.+(2004).+On+the+aesthetic+education+of+man.+Courier+Corporation.&ots=2GI8iYMPBe&sig=lTDUpYNkHVC2neVym-G1elgnqIM#v=onepage&q&f=false.