The socket-shield technique: a critical literature review
Tóm tắt
Dental implants have become a standard treatment in the replacement of missing teeth. After tooth extraction and implant placement, resorption of buccal bundle bone can pose a significant complication with often very negative cosmetic impacts. Studies have shown that if the dental root remains in the alveolar process, bundle bone resorption is very minimal. However, to date, the deliberate retention of roots to preserve bone has not been routinely used in dental implantology. This study aims to collect and evaluate the present knowledge with regard to the socket-shield technique as described by Hurzeler et al. (J Clin Periodontol 37(9):855-62, 2010). A PubMed database search (
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed
) was conducted to identify relevant publication. The initial database search returned 229 results. After screening the abstracts, 13 articles were downloaded and further scrutinised. Twelve studies were found to meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Whilst the socket-shield technique potentially offers promising outcomes, reducing the need for invasive bone grafts around implants in the aesthetic zone, clinical data to support this is very limited. The limited data available is compromised by a lack of well-designed prospective randomised controlled studies. The existing case reports are of very limited scientific value. Retrospective studies exist in limited numbers but are of inconsistent design. At this stage, it is unclear whether the socket-shield technique will provide a stable long-time outcome.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Hurzeler MB, et al. The socket-shield technique: a proof-of-principle report. J Clin Periodontol. 2010;37(9):855–62.
Schwimer C, et al. Human histologic evidence of new bone formation and osseointegration between root dentin (unplanned socket-shield) and dental implant: Case Report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(1):e19–23.
Mourya A, et al. Socket-shield technique for implant placement to stabilize the facial gingival and osseous architecture: a systematic review. J Investig Clin Dent. 2019;10(4):e12449.
Bramanti E, et al. Postextraction dental implant in the aesthetic zone, socket shield technique versus conventional protocol. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(4):1037–41.
Dary HA, Hadidi AA. The socket shield technique using bone trephine: a case report. Int J Dent Oral Sci. 2015:1–5.
Arabbi KC, et al. Socket shield: a case report. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019;11(Suppl 1):S72–5.
Baumer D, et al. The socket-shield technique: first histological, clinical, and volumetrical observations after separation of the buccal tooth segment - a pilot study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(1):71–82.
Baumer D, et al. Socket shield technique for immediate implant placement - clinical, radiographic and volumetric data after 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(11):1450–8.
Cherel F, Etienne D. Papilla preservation between two implants: a modified socket-shield technique to maintain the scalloped anatomy? A case report. Quintessence Int. 2014;45(1):23–30.
Dayakar M, et al. The socket-shield technique and immediate implant placement. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2018;(5):22.
Glocker M, Attin T, Schmidlin P. Ridge preservation with modified “Socket-Shield” technique: a methodological case series. Dentistry J. 2014;2(1):11–21.
Gluckman H, Salama M, Du Toit J. A retrospective evaluation of 128 socket-shield cases in the esthetic zone and posterior sites: partial extraction therapy with up to 4 years follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20(2):122–9.
Gluckman H, Du Toit J, Salama M. The pontic-shield: partial extraction therapy for ridge preservation and pontic site development. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2016;36(3):417–23.
Guo T, et al. Tissue preservation through socket-shield technique and platelet-rich fibrin in immediate implant placement. Medicine. 2018;97(50).
Han CH, Park KB, Mangano FG. The modified socket shield technique. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(8):2247–54.
Huang H, et al. Immediate implant combined with modified socket-shield technique: a case letter. J Oral Implantol. 2017;43(2):139–43.
Kan JYK, Rungcharassaeng K. Proximal socket shield for interimplant papilla preservation in the esthetic zone. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013;33(1):e24–31.
Mitsias ME, et al. The root membrane technique: human histologic evidence after five years of function. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:7269467.
Mitsias ME, et al. A step-by-step description of PDL-mediated ridge preservation for immediate implant rehabilitation in the esthetic region. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2015;35(6):835–41.
Szmukler-Moncler S, et al. Unconventional implant placement part III: implant placement encroaching upon residual roots - a report of six cases. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(Suppl 2):e396–405.
Nevins ML, Langer L, Schupbach P. Late dental implant failures associated with retained root fragments: case reports with histologic and SEM analysis. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018;38(1):9–15.
Saeidi Pour R, et al. Clinical benefits of the immediate implant socket shield technique. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017;29(2):93–101.
Siormpas KD, et al. Immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone utilizing the “root-membrane” technique: clinical results up to 5 years postloading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(6):1397–405.
Siormpas KD, et al. The root membrane technique. Implant Dent. 2018;27(5):564–74.
Wadhwani P, et al. Socket shield technique: a new concept of ridge preservation. Asian J Oral Health Allied Sci. 2015;5(2):55–8.
Gluckman H, Du Toit J, and S. M. Guided bone regeneration of a fenestration complication at implant placement simultaneous to the socket-shield technique. Int J. 5(4): p. 58-64.
Gluckman H, Salama M, Du Toit J. Partial extraction therapies (PET) part 2: procedures and technical aspects. Int J Periodont Restorative Dent. 2017;37(3):377–85.