The VCDQ – a Questionnaire for symptom monitoring in vocal cord dysfunction

Clinical and Experimental Allergy - Tập 45 Số 9 - Trang 1406-1411 - 2015
Stephen J. Fowler1,2, Andrew Thurston2, Brigit Chesworth2, Vincent Chi‐Chung Cheng2, P. Constantinou2, Amitkumar J. Vyas2, S. Lillie2, Jonathan L. Haines2
1Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR South Manchester Respiratory and Allergy Clinical Research Facility, University Hospital of South Manchester, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
2Respiratory Medicine, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK

Tóm tắt

SummaryBackground

Vocal cord dysfunction (VCD) typically involves abnormal adduction of the vocal cords during inspiration, mimics the symptoms of asthma and leads to the prescription of ineffective medications.

Objective

We aimed to develop a clinical tool to monitor symptoms and response to treatment in confirmed VCD.

Methods

We collated symptoms of VCD from focus groups comprising patients and healthcare professionals; phrases describing these symptoms were assessed for face validity and internal correlation and rated for importance. The resultant 12‐item questionnaire (VCDQ) rated the impact of each on a 5‐point Likert scale (total score range 12–60) and was tested for reliability, concurrent validity and performance in 31 patients with endoscopically confirmed VCD (± asthma), 29 asthmatics with no history of VCD and 14 healthy controls. We assessed response to speech and language therapy and the minimal important difference by measuring the VCDQ pre‐ and post‐ therapy in a 20 new patients.

Results

The VCDQ had excellent test–retest reliability and differentiated VCD vs. healthy (Mann–Whitney U‐test: z = −5.390, P < 0.001) and asthma (z = −5.730, P < 0.001). All patients improved post‐therapy, assessed both by a global rating of change score (GRCS) and by the VCDQ [median (IQR) score pre‐therapy 50.5 (48.0 – 54.8), post‐therapy 35.0 (29.3 – 41.8), P < 0.001]. The minimal important difference in the VCDQ associated with a rating of ‘minimally better’ on the GRCS was 4 points.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance

The VCDQ is a valid and responsive tool suitable for measuring changes in symptoms in patients with VCD. It also gives insight into which symptoms are important to patients and could guide future therapy refinements. Future assessments of novel therapies for this condition should use an appropriately validated tool such as the VCDQ to measure response.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1183/09031936.00192809

10.1378/chest.123.2.468

10.1097/00043764-199802000-00009

10.1164/ajrccm.152.4.7551399

10.1002/lary.23176

10.1378/chest.129.4.905

10.1378/chest.118.3.874

10.1136/thx.2008.097741

10.1183/09031936.00138707

10.1097/01.cpm.0000203745.50250.3b

10.1378/chest.116.6.1676

10.1111/j.1365-2222.1974.tb01390.x

10.1016/S0091-6749(97)70194-5

10.1111/j.1440-1843.2009.01568.x

10.1016/j.anai.2010.09.004

10.1016/S0892-1997(96)80022-1

10.1136/thorax.58.4.339

10.1016/S0954-6111(06)80166-6

10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d3cfc9

10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6