The scaling of green space coverage in European cities

Biology Letters - Tập 5 Số 3 - Trang 352-355 - 2009
Richard A. Fuller1, Kevin J. Gaston2
1The Ecology Centre, The University of QueenslandSt Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
2Biodiversity and Macroecology Group, Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of SheffieldSheffield S10 2TN, UK

Tóm tắt

Most people on the planet live in dense aggregations, and policy directives emphasize green areas within cities to ameliorate some of the problems of urban living. Benefits of urban green spaces range from physical and psychological health to social cohesion, ecosystem service provision and biodiversity conservation. Green space coverage differs enormously among cities, yet little is known about the correlates or geography of this variation. This is important because urbanization is accelerating and the consequences for green space are unclear. Here, we use standardized major axis regression to explore the relationships between urban green space coverage, city area and population size across 386 European cities. We show that green space coverage increases more rapidly than city area, yet declines only weakly as human population density increases. Thus, green space provision within a city is primarily related to city area rather than the number of inhabitants that it serves, or a simple space-filling effect. Thus, compact cities (small size and high density) show very lowper capitagreen space allocation. However, at high levels of urbanicity, the green space network is robust to further city compaction. As cities grow, interactions between people and nature depend increasingly on landscape quality outside formal green space networks, such as street plantings, or the size, composition and management of backyards and gardens.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.08.035

10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.04.004

10.1073/pnas.0610172104

10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0

10.1080/00420980050162184

10.1177/001391659702900402

Department of Communities and Local Government Planning policy statement 3 (PPS3): housing. 2006 London UK:HMSO.

10.1126/science.1150198

European Environment Agency 2006 Urban sprawl in Europe: the ignored challenge. EEA Report number 10 European Commission Joint Research Centre Copenhagen Denmark.

10.1098/rsbl.2007.0149

Fuller R. A. Tratalos J. Warren P. H. Davies R. G. Pępkowska A. & Gaston K. J. In press. Environment and biodiversity. In Dimensions of the sustainable city (eds M. Jenks & C. Jones). Dordrecht The Netherlands: Springer Science.

Gilbert O.L. The ecology of urban habitats. 1989 London UK:Chapman & Hall.

10.1136/jech.2005.043125

10.1080/00420980701471943

Milego R. Urban morphological zones 2000 version F1v0: definition and procedural steps. 2007 Barcelona Spain:European Environment Agency.

10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.013

Mücher C. A. 2000 PELCOM project: development of a consistent methodology to derive land cover information on a European scale from remote sensing for environmental modelling. Final report part 2 EU DG XII-D.

10.1016/S0169-2046(96)00324-6

10.1007/s00267-005-0197-z

10.1016/j.biocon.2008.03.022

United Nations World urbanization prospects: the 2007 revision. 2007 New York NY:United Nations.

10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00497.x

10.1017/S1464793106007007

Wilson E.O. Biophilia. 1984 Cambridge MA:Harvard University Press.