The role of teams, culture, and capacity in the transfer of organizational practices

Emerald - 2010
Leyland M.Lucas1
1Department of Management and Business Administration, Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Tóm tắt

PurposeTransferring organizational practices requires an understanding not only of what is being transferred but also of what is needed to ensure that the transfer is successful. In line with this thinking, the purpose of this study is to examine three factors that are crucial parts of this mechanism: use of teams, culture, and capacity.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses a quantitative approach of a Fortune 500 company involved in energy supply. Data are gathered using survey methodology with items drawn from previous research. Hierarchical ordinary least squares are the methodology employed to analyze the data.FindingsThe study highlights how using teams, employing a collaborative culture, and possessing capacity after accounting for the control variables affected the knowledge transfer process and provides some insights into ways in which the process can be better managed.Research limitations/implicationsUsing this framework, it becomes problematic to separate individual and collective learning.Practical implicationsThe paper reinforces the idea that building a collaborative environment in which sharing and seeing knowledge as an organizational asset are essential to success.Originality/valueThe study reinforces the notion that individuals are being asked to make a major change in their approach to the management of knowledge: rather than as an individual asset to be exploited, it should be seen as an organizational asset. This requires that employees change the way they do things. Furthermore, knowledge is not an asset that can be easily discarded and replaced. As a consequence, organizations need to recognize that knowledge management can only be successful if a collaborative environment is created and the organization builds on what it already knows.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ancona, D.G. and Caldwell, D.F. (1992), “Bridging the boundary: external activity and performance in organizational teams”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 37, pp. 634‐65.

Ang, Z. and Massingham, P. (2007), “National culture and the standardization versus adaptation of knowledge management”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 5‐21.

Argote, L. (2001), Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.

Bender, S. and Fish, A. (2000), “The transfer of knowledge and the retention of expertise: the continuing need for global assignments”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 4, pp. 125‐37.

Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. (1991), “Organizational learning and communities‐of‐practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation”, Organization Science, Vol. 2, pp. 40‐57.

Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. (1998), “Organizational knowledge”, California Management Review, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 90‐111.

Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. (2001), “Structure and spontaneity: knowledge and organization”, in Nonaka, I. and Teece, D. (Eds), Managing Industrial Knowledge: Creation, Transfer, and Utilization, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Bunderson, J.S. (2003), “Team member functional background and involvement in management teams: direct effects and the moderating role of power centralization”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 46, pp. 458‐74.

Chase, R. (1998), “The people factor”, People Management, Vol. 4 No. 2, p. 38.

Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A. (1990), “Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, pp. 128‐52.

Darr, E.D. and Kurtzberg, T.R. (2000), “An investigation of partner similarity dimensions on knowledge transfer”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 82, pp. 28‐44.

Denison, D.R. and Mishra, A.K. (1995), “Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness”, Organization Science, Vol. 6, pp. 204‐23.

Edge, K. (2005), “Powerful public sector knowledge management: a school district example”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 9 No. 6, pp. 42‐52.

Eisenhardt, K.M. and Tabrizi, B. (1995), “Accelerating adaptive processes: product innovation in the global computer industry”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 40, pp. 84‐110.

Finestone, N. and Snyman, R. (2005), “Corporate South Africa: making multicultural knowledge sharing work”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 128‐41.

Gavetti, G. and Levinthal, D. (2000), “Looking forward and looking backward: cognitive and experiential search”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 45, pp. 113‐37.

Gibson, C.B., Zellmer‐Bruhn, M. and Schwab, D. (2003), “Team effectiveness in multinational organizations: evaluation across contexts”, Group & Organization Management, Vol. 28, pp. 444‐74.

Gick, M.L. and Holyoak, K.J. (1987), “The cognitive basis of knowledge transfer”, in Cormier, S.M. and Hagman, J.D. (Eds), Transfer of Learning: Contemporary Research and Applications, Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 9‐46.

Gladwell, M. (2010), Outliers: The Story of Success, Little, Brown & Co., New York, NY.

Goh, S.C. (2002), “Managing effective knowledge transfer: an integrative framework and some practical implications”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 6, pp. 23‐30.

Grant, R.M. (1996), “Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, pp. 109‐22.

Hair, J.F. (2005), Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice‐Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Jensen, R. and Szulanski, G. (2004), “Stickiness and the adaptation of organizational practices in cross‐border knowledge transfers”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 35, pp. 508‐23.

Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1995), “Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: an empirical test”, Organization Science, Vol. 6, pp. 76‐92.

Kostova, T. (1999), “Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: a contextual perspective”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24, pp. 308‐24.

Lane, P. and Lubatkin, M. (1998), “Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19, pp. 461‐77.

Leonard, D. and Sensiper, S. (1998), “The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation”, California Management Review, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 112‐31.

Lippert, S. and Davis, M. (2006), “A conceptual model integrating trust into planned change activities to enhance technology adoption behavior”, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 32 No. 5, pp. 434‐48.

McDermott, R. and O'Dell, C. (2001), “Overcoming cultural barriers to sharing knowledge”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 5, pp. 76‐85.

Minbaeva, D., Pedersen, T., Bjorkman, I., Fey, C. and Park, H. (2003), “MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 34, pp. 586‐99.

Orr, J. (1990), “Sharing knowledge, celebrating identity: war stories and community of memory among service technicians”, in Middleton, D.S. and Edwards, D. (Eds), Collective Remembering: Memory in Society, Sage Publications, London.

Parent, R., Roy, M. and St‐Jacques, D. (2007), “A system‐based dynamic knowledge transfer model”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 11 No. 6, pp. 81‐93.

Rempel, J.K. and Holmes, J.G. (1986), “How do I trust thee?”, Psychology Today, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 28‐34.

Ruggles, R. (1998), “The state of the nation: knowledge management in practice”, California Management Review, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 80‐9.

Simonin, B. (2004), “An empirical investigation of the process of knowledge transfer in international strategic alliances”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 35, pp. 407‐27.

Subramaniam, M. and Venkatraman, N. (2001), “Determinants of transnational new product development capability: testing the influence of transferring and deploying tacit overseas knowledge”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22, pp. 359‐78.

Svieby, K. and Simons, R. (2002), “Collaborative climate and effective knowledge work: an empirical study”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 6 No. 5, pp. 420‐33.

Szulanski, G. (1996), “Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, Winter special issue, pp. 27‐43.

Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997), “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, pp. 509‐33.

Van Maanen, J. and Barley, S. (1985), “Cultural organization: fragments of a theory”, in Frost, P.J. (Ed.), Organization Culture, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 31‐54.

Zaheer, A., McEvily, B. and Perrone, V. (1998), “Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance”, Organization Science, Vol. 9, pp. 141‐59.

Zahra, S. and George, G. (2002), “Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 27, pp. 185‐203.

Zarraga, C. and Garcia‐Falcon, J. (2003), “Factors favoring knowledge management in work teams”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 7, pp. 81‐96.

Corner, P., Kinicki, A. and Keats, B. (1994), “Integrating organizational and individual information processing perspectives on choice”, Organization Science, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 294‐308.

Littlepage, G., Robison, W. and Reddington, K. (1997), “Effects of task experience and group experience on group performance, member ability, and recognition of experience”, Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, Vol. 69, pp. 133‐47.

March, J.G. and Simon, H.A. (1958), Organizations, Wiley, New York, NY.

Mowery, D., Oxley, J.E. and Silverman, B.S. (1996), “Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, Winter special issue, pp. 77‐91.

Tyre, M.J. (1991), “Managing the introduction of new process technology: international differences in a multi‐plant network”, Research Policy, Vol. 20, pp. 57‐76.

Wageman, R. (1995), “Independence and group effectiveness”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 40, pp. 145‐80.