The role of hybridization in evolution

Molecular Ecology - Tập 10 Số 3 - Trang 551-568 - 2001
Nick Barton1
1Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK

Tóm tắt

Abstract

Hybridization may influence evolution in a variety of ways. If hybrids are less fit, the geographical range of ecologically divergent populations may be limited, and prezygotic reproductive isolation may be reinforced. If some hybrid genotypes are fitter than one or both parents, at least in some environments, then hybridization could make a positive contribution. Single alleles that are at an advantage in the alternative environment and genetic background will introgress readily, although such introgression may be hard to detect. ‘Hybrid speciation’, in which fit combinations of alleles are established, is more problematic; its likelihood depends on how divergent populations meet, and on the structure of epistasis. These issues are illustrated using Fisher’s model of stabilizing selection on multiple traits, under which reproductive isolation evolves as a side‐effect of adaptation in allopatry. This confirms a priori arguments that while recombinant hybrids are less fit on average, some gene combinations may be fitter than the parents, even in the parental environment. Fisher’s model does predict heterosis in diploid F1s, asymmetric incompatibility in reciprocal backcrosses, and (when dominance is included) Haldane’s Rule. However, heterosis arises only when traits are additive, whereas the latter two patterns require dominance. Moreover, because adaptation isviasubstitutions of small effect, Fisher’s model does not generate the strong effects of single chromosome regions often observed in species crosses.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1948.tb02726.x

10.5962/bhl.title.4553

Arnold M, 1996, Natural Hybridization and Introgression

10.1016/S0169-5347(00)88979-X

10.1038/hdy.1979.87

10.1038/hdy.1986.142

Barton NH, 1997, Natural hybridization and evolution (review of Arnold, 1996), Genetical Research (Cambridge), 70, 178

10.1017/S001667239900422X

10.1038/hdy.1986.135

10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.001025

10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.000553

Bateson W, 1909, Darwin and Modern Science, 85

10.1111/j.1095-8312.1990.tb00836.x

10.1093/genetics/153.2.1055

Burt A, 2000, Sex, recombination and the efficacy of selection — was Weissman right?, Evolution, 54, 337

Coyne JA, 1997, A critique of Wright’s shifting balance theory of evolution, Evolution, 51, 643, 10.2307/2411143

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04233.x

10.1098/rstb.1998.0210

Dobzhansky T, 1937, Genetics and the Origin of Species

10.1086/280899

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb04560.x

Falconer DS, 1995, Introduction to Quantitative Genetics

10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1445:SOEFDD]2.0.CO;2

10.2307/3001780

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb03949.x

10.1006/jtbi.1996.0242

Goodman SJ, 1999, Introgression through rare hybridisation: a genetic study of a hybrid zone between red and sika deer (genus Cervus), in Argyll, Scotland, Genetics, 152, 355, 10.1093/genetics/152.1.355

Grant V, 1971, Plant Speciation

10.1126/science.256.5054.193

10.1007/BF02983075

10.1017/S0305004100015450

10.1007/BF02986626

10.1016/0169-5347(89)90006-2

Hastings A, 1989, Pleiotropic stabilising selection limits the number of polymorphic loci to at most the number of characters, Genetics, 122, 459, 10.1093/genetics/122.2.459

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb00624.x

10.1017/S0016672300010156

10.1098/rspb.2000.1145

10.1073/pnas.54.3.731

10.1017/CBO9780511623486

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1979.tb04678.x

10.1086/413902

10.1098/rspb.1990.0025

10.1086/283071

Maynard Smith J, 1995, The Major Transitions in Evolution

Mayr E, 1942, Systematics and the Origin of Species

10.1086/409995

10.1111/j.1469-185X.1939.tb00934.x

Muller HJ, 1942, Isolating mechanisms, evolution and temperature, Biological Symposium, 6, 71

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb04449.x

10.1038/35012500

Orr HA, 1997, Dobzhansky, Bateson and the genetics of speciation, Genetics, 144, 1331, 10.1093/genetics/144.4.1331

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb01823.x

10.1017/S0016672399004164

10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00002.x

OrrHA&BetancourtA(2001)Haldane’s sieve and adaptation from the standing genetic variation.Genetics 157.

10.1126/science.260.5114.1643

10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01608-0

10.1002/biof.5520100101

10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.359

10.1126/science.272.5262.741

10.1007/s10709-006-9011-y

Searle JB, 1993, Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process, 309, 10.1093/oso/9780195069174.003.0012

10.1093/genetics/75.4.733

10.1093/genetics/81.1.209

10.1046/j.1420-9101.1995.8050623.x

10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01638-9

Stebbins GL, 1959, The role of hybridisation in evolution, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 103, 231

True JR, 1996, A genome wide survey of hybrid incompatibility factors by the introgression of marked segments of Drosophila mauritiana chromosomes into Drosophila simulans, Genetics, 142, 819, 10.1093/genetics/142.3.819

10.1016/0040-5809(84)90017-0

10.1093/genetics/111.1.165

10.1093/genetics/140.1.389

10.1093/genetics/154.4.1663

10.1038/hdy.1992.168

10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111359

10.1093/genetics/147.3.1091

10.1093/genetics/153.2.1041

Wright S, 1942, Genetics of natural populations VII The allelism of lethals in the third chromosome of Drosophila pseudoobscura, Genetics, 27, 363, 10.1093/genetics/27.4.363

Wu CI, 1983, Evidence for extensive genetic differentiation between the sex‐ratio and the standard arrangement of D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis and identification of hybrid sterility factors, Genetics, 105, 71, 10.1093/genetics/105.1.71

10.1146/annurev.ge.28.120194.001435