The role of discourse pragmatics in the acquisition of subjects in Italian

Levinson S. C. 1987.Pragmatics and the grammar of anaphora: A partial pragmatic reduction of binding and control phenomena.Journal of Linguistics,23,379–434.

Huang Y. 1995.On null subjects and null objects in generative grammar.Linguistics,33,1081–1123.

Austin J. , Blume M. , Parkinson D. , Núnez del Prado Z. , & Lust B. 1996.Interactions between pragmatic and syntactic knowledge in the first language acquisition of Spanish null and overt pronominals.In J. Lema & E. Trevino (Eds.),Theoretical analyses on Romance languages(pp. 35–47).Amsterdam:John Benjamins.

Dimitriadis A. 1995.When pro-drop languages don't: On overt pronominal subjects in Greek.Penn Working Papers in Linguistics,2,45–60.

Aissen J. 1999.Markedness and subject choice in optimality theory.Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,17,673–711.

Gundel J. , Hedberg N. , & Zacharski R. 1993.Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse.Language,69,274–307.

Valian V. 1991.Syntactic subjects in the early speech of American and Italian children.Cognition,40,21–81.

Antelmi D. 1997.La prima grammatica dell'italiano: Indagine longitudinale sull'acquisizione della morfosintassi italiana.Bologna:Il Mulino.

Sperber D. , & Wilson D. 1995.Relevance: Communication and cognition.Oxford:Blackwell.

Valian V. , & Eisenberg Z. 1996.The development of syntactic subjects in Portuguese-speaking children.Journal of Child Language,23,103–128.

Allen S. 2000.A discourse-pragmatic explanation for argument representation in child Inuktitut.Linguistics,38,483–521.

Longobardi G. 1994.Reference and proper names.Linguistic Inquiry,25,609–665.

Gundel J. 1996.Relevance theory meets the givenness hierarchy: an account of inferrables.In T. Fretheim & J. Gundel (Eds.),Reference and referent accessibility(pp. 141–153).Amsterdam:John Benjamins.

Tomasello M. 2003.Constructing a language. A usage-based theory of language acquisition.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.

Chafe W. 1996.Inferring identifiability and accessibility.In T. Fretheim & J. Gundel (Eds.),Reference and referent accessibility(pp. 37–46).Amsterdam:John Benjamins.

MacWhinney B. 2000.The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk(3rd ed.).Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.

Allen S. , & Schröder H. 2003.Preferred argument structure in early Inuktitut spontaneous speech data.In J. W. Du Bois , L. Kumpf , & W. Ashby (Eds.),Preferred argument structure: Grammar and architecture for function.Amsterdam:John Benjamins.

Hyams N. 1986.Language acquisition and the theory of parameters.Dordrecht:Reidel.

Lambrecht K. 1994.Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Halliday M. , & Hasan R. 1976.Cohesion in English.London:Longman.

Clancy P. 1993.Preferred argument structure in Korean acquisition.In E. Clark (Ed.),The proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Child Language Research Forum(pp. 307–314).Stanford, CT:CSLI.

Ariel M. 1990.Assessing noun-phrases antecedents.London:Routledge.

Cipriani P. , Pfanner P. , Chilosi A. M. , Cittadoni l. , Ciuti A. , Maccari A. , Pantano N. , Pfanner L. , Poli P. , Sarno S. , Bottari P. , Cappelli G. , Colombo C. , & Veneziano E. 1989.Protocolli diagnostici e terapeutici nello sviluppo e nella patologia del linguaggio (1/84 Ministry of Health).Pisa, Italy:Stella Maris Foundation.

Aguado–Orea J. , & Pine J. 2002.There is no evidence for a “no overt subject” stage in early child Spanish: A note on Grinstead (2000).Journal of Child Language,29,865–874.

van Hoek K. 1995.Conceptual reference points: A cognitive grammar account of pronominal anaphora constraints.Language,71,310–340.

Chafe W. 1994.Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

Greenfield P. , & Smith J. H. 1976.The structure of communication in early language development.New York:Academic Press.

Levinson S. 1991.Pragmatic reduction of the binding conditions revisited.Journal of Linguistics,27,107–161.

Grinstead J. 2000.Case, inflection and subject licensing in child Catalan and Spanish.Journal of Child Language,27,119–156.

Paradis J. , & Navarro S. 2003.Subject realization and cross-linguistic interference in the bilingual acquisition of Spanish and English: What is the role of the input?Journal of Child Language,30,1–23.

Huang Y. 1994.The syntax and pragmatics of anaphora: A study with special reference to Chinese.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Bloom P. 1990.Subjectless sentences in child language.Linguistic Inquiry,21,491–504.

Orsolini M. , Rossi F. , & Pontecorvo C. 1996.Re-introduction of referents in Italian children's narratives.Journal of Child Language,23,465–486.

Givón T. 1979.On understanding grammar.New York:Academic Press.

Guasti M. T. 2002.Language acquisition. The growth of grammar.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.

Ervin–Tripp S. 1970.Discourse agreement: How children answer questions.In J. Hayes (Ed.),Cognition and the development of language(pp. 79–107).New York:Wiley.

Givón T. 1984.Syntax: A functional-typological introduction (Vol. 1).Amsterdam:John Benjamins.

Guerriero S. , Cooper A. , Oshima–Takane Y. , & Kuriyama Y. 2001.A discourse-pragmatic explanation for argument realisation and omission in English and Japanese children's speech.In A. Do (Ed.),BUCLD 25 Proceedings(pp. 319–330).Somerville, MA:Cascadilla Press.

Hyams N. , & Wexler K. 1993.On the grammatical basis of null subjects in child language.Linguistic Inquiry,24,421–460.

Nelson K. 1973.Structure and strategy in learning to talk.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

Orsolini M. & Di Giacinto P. 1996.Use of referential expressions in 4-year-old children's narratives: invented versus recalled stories.In C. Pontecorvo , M. Orsolini , B. Burge , & L. Resnick (Eds.),Children's early text construction(pp. 67–81).Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.

Ariel M. 1996.Referring expressions and the +/− coreference distinction.In T. Fretheim & J. Gundel (Eds.),Reference and referent accessibility(pp. 13–35).Amsterdam:John Benjamins.

Serratrice L. , Sorace A. , & Paoli S. 2004.Crosslinguistic influence at the syntax-pragma- tics interface: Subjects and objects in English-Italian bilingual and monolingual acquisition.Bilingualism: Language and Cognition,7,183–205.

Cornish F. 1999.Anaphora, discourse, and understanding.Oxford:Oxford University Press.

Bates E. 1976.Language and context: The acquisition of pragmatics.New York:Academic Press.

Kempson R. 1996.Semantics, pragmatics and interpretation.In S. Lappin (Ed.),The handbook of contemporary semantic theory(pp. 561–598).Oxford:Blackwell.

Pine J. , Lieven E. , & Rowland C. 1998.Comparing different models of the development of the English verb category.Linguistics,36,807–830.

Chafe W. 1976.Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view.In C. Li (Ed.),Subject and topic(pp. 25–55).London:Academic Press.

Serratrice L. (2002, July 16–21).Syntax and pragmatics in the acquisition of subjects in Italian.Paper presented at the Ninth meeting of the International Association for the Study of Child Language,University of Madison.

Allen S. (in press).Interacting pragmatic influences on children's argument realization.In M. Bowerman & P. Brown (Eds.),Crosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure: Implications for learnability.Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.

Huang Y. 2000.Anaphora: A crosslinguistic study.Oxford:Oxford University Press.