The relative balance of GM-CSF and TGF-β1 regulates lung epithelial barrier function

Christian E. Overgaard1,2, Barbara Schlingmann1, StevenClaude Dorsainvil White1, Chris Ward1,2, Xian Fan3,1, Snehasikta Swarnakar4, Lou Ann S. Brown5,2, David M. Guidot3,1,2, Michael Koval6,1,2
1Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
2Emory Alcohol and Lung Biology Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia;
3Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, Georgia
4Drug Development Diagnostics and Biotechnology, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Kolkata, India;
5Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
6Department of Cell Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia

Tóm tắt

Lung barrier dysfunction is a cardinal feature of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Alcohol abuse, which increases the risk of ARDS two- to fourfold, induces transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1, which increases epithelial permeability and impairs granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-dependent barrier integrity in experimental models. We hypothesized that the relative balance of GM-CSF and TGF-β1 signaling regulates lung epithelial barrier function. GM-CSF and TGF-β1 were tested separately and simultaneously for their effects on lung epithelial cell barrier function in vitro. TGF-β1 alone caused an ∼25% decrease in transepithelial resistance (TER), increased paracellular flux, and was associated with projections perpendicular to tight junctions (“spikes”) containing claudin-18 that colocalized with F-actin. In contrast, GM-CSF treatment induced an ∼20% increase in TER, decreased paracellular flux, and showed decreased colocalization of spike-associated claudin-18 with F-actin. When simultaneously administered to lung epithelial cells, GM-CSF antagonized the effects of TGF-β1 on epithelial barrier function in cultured cells. Given this, GM-CSF and TGF-β1 levels were measured in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid from patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia and correlated with markers for pulmonary edema and patient outcome. In patient BAL fluid, protein markers of lung barrier dysfunction, serum α2-macroglobulin, and IgM levels were increased at lower ratios of GM-CSF/TGF-β1. Critically, patients who survived had significantly higher GM-CSF/TGF-β1 ratios than nonsurviving patients. This study provides experimental and clinical evidence that the relative balance between GM-CSF and TGF-β1 signaling is a key regulator of lung epithelial barrier function. The GM-CSF/TGF-β1 ratio in BAL fluid may provide a concentration-independent biomarker that can predict patient outcomes in ARDS.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1152/ajplung.1999.276.5.L825

10.1164/rccm.200304-478OC

10.1152/ajplung.00141.2005

10.1165/rcmb.2006-0174OC

10.1152/ajplung.00216.2003

10.1007/s00134-004-2503-2

10.1093/alcalc/agn051

10.1165/ajrcmb.10.1.7507342

10.1152/ajplung.00423.2003

Dobbs LG, 1986, Am Rev Respir Dis, 134, 141

10.1126/science.8171324

10.1165/rcmb.2002-0092OC

10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01531.x

10.1152/ajplung.00288.2012

10.1016/j.alcohol.2007.04.010

10.1152/ajplung.90609.2008

10.1152/ajplung.00153.2006

10.1152/ajplung.2000.279.1.L127

10.1172/JCI1396

10.1152/ajplung.1997.273.4.L715

10.2353/ajpath.2010.100168

10.1152/ajplung.00150.2006

10.1152/ajplung.00077.2014

10.1136/thorax.56.12.907

10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183809

10.4161/tisb.24518

10.1152/ajplung.00365.2010

10.1165/rcmb.2008-0270OC

10.1152/ajpcell.00131.2003

10.1152/ajplung.00233.2010

10.1165/rcmb.2013-0456OC

Li G, 2014, Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol, 51, 210, 10.1165/rcmb.2013-0353OC

10.1213/01.ANE.0000087799.85495.8A

10.1097/00003246-200001000-00001

10.1152/ajplung.00299.2010

10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.10.010

10.1164/rccm.200702-255OC

10.1001/jama.1996.03530250054027

10.1097/01.CCM.0000055389.64497.11

10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80545-0

10.1074/jbc.M502449200

10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00626.x

10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822d7bf0

10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63594-8

10.1152/ajplung.00148.2003

10.1172/JCI11963

10.1371/journal.pone.0055972

10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.05.017

10.1513/pats.200601-008AW

10.1016/S1074-7613(01)00218-7

10.1152/ajplung.00415.2010

10.3390/ijerph6092426

10.1146/annurev.physiol.64.090601.113847

10.1165/rcmb.2002-0180OC

10.4161/21688370.2014.982424

10.1152/ajplung.00043.2009

10.1073/pnas.0908869107