The pupil control studies. A historical, theoretical and empirical analysis

Journal of Educational Administration - Tập 39 Số 5 - Trang 424-441 - 2001
Wayne K. Hoy1
1The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. USA

Tóm tắt

The pupil control ideology (PCI) studies originated at The Pennsylvania State University under the direction of Professor Donald J. Willower. Describes the beginning and evolution of the PCI studies and the role of theory in their development. PCI inquiry is now in its fourth decade and the concept of pupil control ideology and its measure (PCI form) continue to be useful to researchers as they analyze behavior in school organizations.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Adler, P.S. (1999), “Building better bureaucracies”, The Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 13, pp. 36‐49.

Adler, P.S. and Borys, B. (1996), “Two types of bureaucracy: enabling and coercive”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 41, pp. 61‐89.

Adorno, T.W., Brunswick, E.F., Levinson, D.J. and Sanford, N. (1950), The Authoritarian Personality, Harper, New York, NY.

Aiken, M. and Hage, J. (1968), “Organizational interdependence and intra‐organizational structure”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 33, pp. 912‐30.

Altemeyer, B. (1997), The Authoritarian Specter, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Anderson, J.G. (1968), Bureaucracy in Education, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, MD.

Appleberry, J.B. and Hoy, W.K. (1969), “The pupil control ideology of professional personnel in ‘open’ and ‘closed’ elementary schools”, Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 5, pp. 74‐85.

Arches, J. (1991), “Social structure, burnout, and job satisfaction”, Social Work, Vol. 36, pp. 202‐6.

Bandura, A. (1977), “Self‐efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change”, Psychological Review, Vol. 84, pp. 191‐215.

Bandura, A. (1997), Self‐Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, Freeman, New York, NY.

Bean, J.S. and Hoy, W.K. (1974), “Pupil control ideology of teachers and instructional climate in the classroom”, High School Journal, Vol. 58, pp. 61‐9.

Blankenship, J. and Hoy, W.K. (1967), “An analysis of the relationship between open‐ and closed‐mindedness and capacity for independent thought and action”, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 5, pp. 69‐72.

Carlson, R.O. (1964), “Environmental constraints and organizational consequences: the public school and its clients”, in Griffiths, D.E. (Ed.), Behavioral Science and Educational Administration, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 262‐76.

Coleman, J.S. (1961), The Adolescent Society, Free Press, New York, NY.

Coleman, J.S. (1974), Power and Structure of Society, Norton, New York, NY.

Craig, T. (1995), “Achieving innovation through bureaucracy”, California Management Review, Vol. 38, pp. 8‐36.

Damanpour, F. (1991), “Organizational innovation”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 34, pp. 555‐91.

Deibert, J.P. and Hoy, W.K. (1977), “Custodial high schools and self‐actualization of students”, Educational Research Quarterly, Vol. 2, pp. 24‐31.

Denig, S.J. (1999), “Discipline in public and religious elementary and secondary schools: a comparative analysis”, The Journal of Research on Christian Education, Vol. 8, pp. 51‐74.

Etzioni, A. (1962), A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations, Free Press, New York, NY.

Finkelstein, R. (1998), “The effects of organizational health and pupil control ideology on the achievement and alienation of high school students”, doctoral dissertation, St. John’s University, Jamaica, NY.

Getzels, J.W. and Guba, E.G. (1957), “Social behavior and the administrative process”, School Review, Vol. 65, pp. 423‐41.

Gilbert, D.C. and Levinson, D.J. (1957), “Custodialism and humanism in mental hospital structure and staff ideology”, in Greenblatt, M. (Ed.), The Patient and the Mental Hospital, The Free Press, Glencoe, IL, pp. 20‐34.

Hall, E., Hall, C. and Abaci, R. (1997), “The effects of human relations training on reported teacher stress, pupil control ideology, and locus of control”, British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 19, pp. 488‐96.

Hage, J. and Aiken, M. (1970), Social Change in Complex Organizations, Random House, New York, NY.

Helsel, A.R. (1976), “Personality and pupil control behaviour”, Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 14, pp. 79‐86.

Hoy, W.K. (1967), “Organizational socialization: the student teacher and pupil control ideology”, Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 61, pp. 153‐5.

Hoy, W.K. (1968), “Pupil control and organizational socialization: the influence of experience on the beginning teacher”, School Review, Vol. 76, pp. 312‐23.

Hoy, W.K. (1969), “Pupil control ideology and organizational socialization: a further examination of the influence of experience on the beginning teacher”, School Review, Vol. 77, pp. 257‐65.

Hoy, W.K. (1972), “Dimensions of student alienation and characteristics of public high schools”, Interchange, Vol. 3, pp. 38‐52.

Hoy, W.K. (1978), “Scientific research in educational administration”, Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 14, pp. 1‐12.

Hoy, W.K. (1982), “Recent developments in theory and research in educational administration”, Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 18, pp. 1‐10.

Hoy, W.K. (1994), “Foundations of educational administration: traditional and emerging perspectives”, Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 30, pp. 178‐98.

Hoy, W.K. and Henderson, J.E. (1983), “Principal authenticity, school climate, and pupil‐control orientation”, Alberta Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 2, pp. 123‐30.

Hoy, W.K. and Miskel, C.G. (2001), Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6th ed., McGraw Hill, New York, NY.

Hoy, W.K. and Rees, R. (1977), “The bureaucratic socialization of student teachers”, Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 28, pp. 23‐6.

Hoy, W.K. and Sweetland, S.R. (2000), “Bureaucracies that work: enabling not coercive”, Journal of School Leadership, Vol. 10, pp. 525‐41.

Hoy, W.K. and Sweetland, S.R. (2001), “Designing better schools: the meaning and measure of enabling school structures”, on‐line at http://www.coe.ohio‐state.edu/whoy/cases_5.htm

Hoy, W.K. and Woolfolk, A.E. (1990), “Socialization of student teachers”, American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 27, pp. 279‐300.

Hoy, W.K., Blazovsky, R. and Newland, W. (1983), “Bureaucracy and alienation: a comparative analysis”, The Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 21, pp. 109‐21.

Leppert, E. and Hoy, W.K. (1972), “Teacher personality and pupil control ideology”, The Journal of Experimental Education, Vol. 40, pp. 57‐9.

Lewin, K., Lippitt, R. and White, R. (1930), “Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created social climates”, Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 10, pp. 271‐99.

Lunnenberg, F.C. (1983), “Pupil control ideology and self concept as a learner”, Educational Research Quarterly, Vol. 8, pp. 33‐9.

Lunnenberg, F.C. (1991a), “Educators’ pupil‐control ideology as a predictor of educators’ reactions to pupil disruptive behavior”, High School Journal, Vol. 74, pp. 81‐7.

Lunnenberg, F.C. (1991b), “Pupil control ideology and behavior as predictors of environmental robustness: public and private schools compared”, Journal of Research and Development in Education, Vol. 24, pp. 14‐19.

Lunnenberg, F.C. (1992), “Locus of control, pupil control ideology, and dimensions of teacher burnout”, Journal of Instructional Psychology, Vol. 19, pp. 13‐22.

Lunnenberg, F.C. (2000), “School bureaucratization, pupil control ideology, and pupil control behavior”, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

Lunnenberg, F.C. and Schmidt, L.J. (1989), “Pupil control ideology, pupil control behavior, and quality of school life”, Journal of Research and Development in Education, Vol. 22, pp. 35‐44.

Michaels, R.E., Cron, W.L., Dubinsky, A.J. and Joachimsthaler, E.A. (1988), “Influence of formalization on the organizational commitment and work alienation of salespeople and industrial buyers”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 25, pp. 376‐83.

McAuthur, J.T. (1978), “What does teaching do to teachers?”, Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 14, pp. 89‐103.

McAuthur, J.T. (1979), “Teacher socialization: the first five years”, Alberta Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 25, pp. 264‐74.

Mintzberg, H. (1989), Mintzberg on Management, Free Press, New York, NY.

Moretz, S.A. (1997), “Trust, autonomy, and teacher’s student control ideology”, doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.

Morrison, T.G., Wilcox, B., Madrigal, J.L. and McEwan, B. (1997), “Development of teachers’ theoretical orientations toward reading and pupil control ideology”, Reading and Research Instruction, Vol. 36, pp. 141‐56.

Morrison, T.G., Wilcox, B., Madrigal, J.L., Roberts, S. and Hintze, E. (1999), “Teachers’ theoretical orientations toward reading and pupil control ideology: a national survey”, Reading Research and Instruction, Vol. 38, pp. 333‐50.

Nachtscheim, N. and Hoy, W.K. (1976), “Authoritarian personality and control ideologies of teachers”, The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 22, pp. 173‐7.

Packard, J.S. (1989), “The pupil control studies”, in Boyan, N. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Educational Administration, Longman, New York, NY, pp. 185‐207.

Rokeach, M. (1960), The Open and Closed Mind, Basic Books, New York, NY.

Rotter, J. (1954), Social Learning and Clinical Psychology, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliff, NJ.

Saad, I.A. and Hendrix, V.L. (1993), “Pupil control ideology in a multicultural society: Arab and Jewish teachers in Israeli elementary schools”, Comparative Education Review, Vol. 37, pp. 21‐30.

Scott, W.R. (1998), Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems, 4th ed., Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Senatra, P.T. (1980), “Role conflict, role ambiguity, and organizational climate in a public accounting firm”, Accounting Review, Vol. 55, pp. 594‐603.

Waller, W. (1932), The Sociology of Teaching, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.

Weinstein, C.S., Woolfolk, A.E., Dittmeir, L. and Shanker, U. (1994), “Protector or prison guard; using metaphors and media to explore student teachers’ thinking about classroom management”, Action in Teacher Education, Vol. 16, pp. 41‐54.

Willower, D.J. (1965), “Hypotheses on the school as a social system”, Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 1, pp. 40‐51.

Willower, D.J. and Jones, R.G. (1963), “When pupil control becomes and institutional theme”, Phi Delta Kappa, Vol. 45, pp. 107‐9.

Willower, D.J. and Jones, R.G. (1967), “Control in an educational organization”, in Raths, J.D., Pancella, J.R. and Ness, J.S.V. (Eds), Studying Teaching, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 424‐8.

Willower, D.J., Eidell, T.L. and Hoy, W.K. (1967), The School and Pupil Control Ideology, Monograph No. 24, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.