The power of knowledge: information transfer and açaí intensification in the peri-urban interface of Belém, Brazil
Tóm tắt
Academic scholarship and development paradigms promote non-timber forest products (NTFPs) as potential options to link environmental conservation with sustainable economic development objectives for rural communities worldwide. The açaí berry (Euterpe oleracea) is a native palm found in forest ecosystems of northern Brazil and historically extracted and sold in regional markets. Recent increases in national and international açaí demand have resulted in dramatic price increases. Management decisions on a local producer level reflect trends not typically associated with traditional NTFPs as future production and income expectations increase. This case study draws on research conducted in peri-urban communities in close proximity to Belém, Brazil. The work draws links between recent açaí intensification trends in upland areas and information pathways that are contributing to this pattern. This paper argues that external information sources regarding land use choices are prioritized over local knowledge and market indicators which previously have been described as drivers for intensification processes of NTFPs. This qualitative analysis highlights the power structures that influence information sharing and in turn, land use choices on a community level. The results of this analysis are important for NTFP intervention initiatives focused on risk management for smallholders. Finally, this study is a useful complement for ecological studies currently being conducted on intensification processes of non-timber forest products.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alcorn JB (1993) Indigenous peoples and conservation. Conserv Biol 7:424–426
Arnold JEM, Ruiz-Perez M (2001) Can non-timber forest products match tropical forest conservation and development objectives. Ecol Econ 39:437–447
Belcher B, Schreckenberg K (2007) Commercialisation of non-timber forest products: a reality check. Dev Policy Rev 25(3):355–377
Bennett BC (2002) Forest products and traditional peoples: economic, biological and cultural considerations. Nat Resour Forum 26(4, November):293–301
Brondizio E (2004a) Agriculture intensification, economic identity and shared invisibility in Amazonian peasantry: Caboclos and Colonists in comparison perspective. Cult Agric 26(1&2, Spring/Fall):1–24
Brondizio E (2004b) From staple to fashion food: shifting cycles and shifting opportunities in the development of the acai palm fruit economy in the Amazon estuary. In: Zarin DJ et al (eds) Working forest in the neotropics. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 339–365
Brondizio ES, Siqueira AD (1997) From extractivists to forest farmers: changing concepts of Caboclo agroforestry in the Amazon estuary. Res Econ Anthropol 18:233–279
Brondizio ES et al (1994) Land use change in the Amazon estuary: patterns of Caboclo settlement and landscape management. Human Ecol 22(3):249–278
Brondizio E, Safar CAM, Siqueira AD (2002) The urban market of Açaí fruit (Euterpe oleracea Mart.) and rural land use change: ethnographic insights into the role of price and land tenure constraining agricultural choices in the Amazon estuary. Urban Ecosyst 6:67–97
Coomes OT, Burt GJ (1997) Indigenous market-oriented agroforestry: dissecting local diversity in western Amazonia. Agroforest Syst 37:27–44
Dantas da Silva PJ, Soares de Almeida S (2004) Estrutura ecológica de açaizais em ecosistemas inundáveis da Amazônia. In: Jardim MAG et al (eds) Açaí: possibilidades e limites para o desenvolvimento sustentável no estuário amazônico. Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Belém, pp 37–51
Dove MR (1993) A revisionist view of tropical deforestation and development. Environ Conserv 20(1, Spring):17–24
FAO (1997) http://www.fao.org/docrep/W4345E/W4345E00.htm. In state of the World’s forests. Ed. Accessed on 12 December 2006
FAO (2003) http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/005/Y7581E/y7581e00.htm. In state of the World’s forests. Ed. Accessed on 12 December 2006
Jardim MAG (2004) Pesquisas com a Palmeira Acai (Euterpe oleracea Mart.) No Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. In: Jardim MAG et al (eds) Açaí: possibilidades e limites para o desenvolvimento sustentável no estuário amazônico. Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Belém, pp 79–100
Leakey RRB, Simons AJ (1998) The domestication and commercialization of indigenous trees in agroforestry for the alleviation of poverty. Agroforest Syst 38:165–176
Mahapatra A, Mitchell CP (1997) Sustainable development of non-timber forest products: implication for forest management in India. For Ecol Manage 94(1, June):15–29
McSweeney K (2004) Forest product sale as natural insurance: the effects of household characteristics and the nature of shock in eastern Honduras. Soc Nat Resour 17:39–56
Pattanayak SK, Sills EO (2001) Do tropical forests provide natural insurance? The microeconomics of non-timber forest product collection in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Econ 7(4):595–612
Rogez H (2006) Personal communication. Universidade Federal do Para, June
Ruiz-Pérez M, Belcher B et al (2004a) Markets drive the specialization strategies of forest peoples. Ecol Soc 9(2):4–27
Ruiz-Pérez M, Belcher B, Maoyi F, Xiansheng Y (2004b) Looking through the bamboo curtain: an analysis of the changing role of forest and farm income in rural livelihoods in China. Int Forest Rev 61(3–4):306–316
Shackleton C, Shackleton S (2004) The importance of non-timber forest products in rural livelihood security and as safety nets: a review of evidence from South Africa. S Afr J Sci 100(November/December):658–665
Siqueira AD, Murrieta RSS, Brondizio ES (2000) Land tenure, access to resources and food security in the Amazon estuary. Paper presented at the international association of common property conference, Bloomington, IN (May 31–June 4)
Stoian D (2005) Making the best of two worlds: rural and peri-urban livelihood options sustained by nontimber forest products from the Bolivian Amazon. World Dev 33(9):1473–1490
Weinstein S, Moegenburg S (2004) Acai palm management in the amazon estuary: course for conservation or passage to plantations? Conserv Soc 2(2):315–346