The phenomenological ontology of literature

Frontiers of Philosophy in China - Tập 5 - Trang 621-630 - 2010
Xiaomang Deng1
1School of Philosophy, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

Tóm tắt

Literary ontology is essentially a phenomenological issue rather than one of epistemology, sociology, or psychology. It is a theory of the phenomenological essence intuited from a sense of beauty, based on the phenomenological ontology of beauty, which puts into “brackets” the sociohistorical premises and material conditions of aesthetic phenomena. Beauty is the “objectified” emotion. This is the phenomenological definition of the essence of beauty, which manifests itself on three levels, namely “emotion qua selfconsciousness,” “sense of beauty qua emotion,” and “sentiment qua sense of beauty.” Art on the other hand is the “objectification of emotion” whose most general and closest manner to “humanity” is literature and poetry. Poetry is the origin of language and the linguistic essence is a metaphor. Language as “the house of being” is both “thinking” and “poetry.” Literature expresses the essence of art in the most direct way and, in traditional Chinese aesthetic terminology, literature is the “language of emotion” conveyed by the writer based on his own emotion towards the “language of scene.”

Tài liệu tham khảo

Chen Wangheng (2001). 20 Shiji Zhongguo Meixue Bentilun Wenti 20世纪中国美学本体论问题 (Issues of Chinese Aesthetic Ontology in 20th Century). Changsha: Hunan Jiaoyu Chubanshe

Croce, B. (1983). Aesthetic as Science of Expression and General Linguistics (in Chinese), trans. by Zhu Guangqian. Beijing: Waiguo Wenxue Chubanshe

Deng Xiaomang (1986). “Guanyu Mei he Yishu de Benzhi de Xianxiangxue Sikao” 关于美和 艺术的本质的现象学思考 (“The Phenomenological Thinking on the Nature of Art and Beauty”). Zhexue Yanjiu, No. 8, 75–80

Deng Xiaomang (2000). “Shenme shi Yishuzuopin de Benyuan: Haidege’er yu Makesi Meixue Sixiang de Yige Bijiao” 什么是艺术作品的本源?—海德格尔与马克思美学思想的一个比较 (“What is the Origin of Works of Art: The Comparison of Marx and Heidegger’s Aesthetic Thinking”). Zhexue Yanjiu, No. 8, 58–64

Heidegger, I. (1996a). “The Letters with Regard to Humanitarian.” In: Sun Zhouxing ed. Selected Works of Heidegger (in Chinese). Shanghai: Shanghai Sanlian Shudian

Heidegger, I. (1996c). “Language.” In: Sun Zhouxing ed. Selected Works of Heidegger (in Chinese). Shanghai: Shanghai Sanlian Shudian

Ni Liangkang (1999). Husaier Xianxiangxue Gainian Tongshi 胡塞尔现象学概念通释 (General Interpretation of Husserl’s Terminology). Beijing: Beijing Sanlian Shudian

Vico, G. (1986). New Science (in Chinese). Beijing: Renmin Wenxue Chubanshe

Wang Fuzhi (1981). “Jiangzhai Shihua” 姜斋诗话 (“Research on Poetry by Wang Fuzhi”). In: Department of Philosophy, Peking University ed. Zhongguo Meixueshi Ziliao Xuanbian 中 国美学史资料选编 (Selected Data on the History of Chinese Aesthetics) (II). Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju

Yang Chunshi (2002). “Xin Shijian Meixue Buneng Zouchu Shijian Meixue de Kunjing: Da Yizhongtian Xiansheng” 新实践美学不能走出实践美学的困境——答易中天先生 (“New Practical Aesthetics Cannot Emerge from the Plight of Practical Aesthetics: Reply to Mr. Yi Zhongtian”). Xueshu Yuekan, No. 1, 46–51

Yi Zhongtian (2002). “Zouxiang ‘Houshijian’ Meixue, Haishi Zouxiang ‘Xinshijian’ Meixue?” 走向“后实践”美学, 还是走向“新实践”美学? (“Are We Heading for’ Post-Practical’ Aesthetics or ‘Neo-Practical’ Aesthetics?”). Xueshu Yuekan, No. 1, 40–45