Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Bối cảnh quyết định vi mô được kết nối: một lăng kính mới về quản trị đô thị biến đổi
Tóm tắt
Những gián đoạn xã hội quy mô lớn gần đây, từ đại dịch COVID-19 đến những trận cháy rừng gia tăng và các hiện tượng thời tiết khắc nghiệt, đã chỉ ra tầm quan trọng của việc chuyển đổi hệ thống quản trị để có thể giải quyết những khủng hoảng phức tạp, liên biên giới và phát triển nhanh chóng. Tuy nhiên, kiến thức hiện nay về động lực ra quyết định tạo ra quản trị biến đổi vẫn còn ít ỏi. Các nghiên cứu thường tập trung vào các kết quả tổng hợp của các quyết định chính phủ, trong khi bỏ qua những yếu tố nền tảng cấp vi mô của chúng. Đây là một sự thiếu sót chính vì những yếu tố thúc đẩy sự thay đổi chính sách, như là học hỏi hoặc cạnh tranh, được thực hiện bởi con người thay vì các tổ chức. Chúng tôi phản hồi lại khoảng trống kiến thức này bằng cách đưa ra một lăng kính phân tích mới để hiểu về việc xây dựng chính sách, nhằm khám phá cách mà đặc điểm của các nhà ra quyết định và cấu trúc các mối quan hệ của họ ảnh hưởng đến khả năng thực hiện các phản ứng chính sách biến đổi. Quan điểm này nhấn mạnh sự cần thiết phải có một cái nhìn động và quan hệ hơn về quản trị đô thị trong bối cảnh chuyển đổi. 1. Các thuộc tính của nhà hoạch định chính sách và mạng lưới xã hội đều hình thành năng lực chuyển đổi đô thị. 2. Năng lực chuyển đổi của một thành phố có thể cao hơn khi các nhân tố tham gia ra quyết định đa dạng hơn. 3. Sự đa dạng kích thích sự sáng tạo và đổi mới bằng cách cải thiện khả năng tiếp cận kiến thức, cơ hội học hỏi và kỹ năng. 4. Chất lượng mối quan hệ, cụ thể hơn là lòng tin lẫn nhau, có thể giúp giải thích tại sao một số thành phố chuyển mình trong khi những thành phố khác thì không. 5. Lãnh đạo hỗ trợ là yếu tố then chốt trong việc bảo vệ lòng tin và đảm bảo sự đa dạng giữa các nhà ra quyết định.
Từ khóa
#quản trị đô thị #quyết định chính sách #năng lực chuyển đổi #đa dạng #lãnh đạo hỗ trợTài liệu tham khảo
“68% of the world population projected to live in cities by 2015, says UN.” United Nations, UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. May 16, 2018.
Acuto M. Give cities a seat at the top table. Nature News. 2016;537(7622):611.
Adger WN. Adapting to climate change: thresholds, values, governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
Ansell C, Gash A. Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2007;18(4):543–71.
Argyris C. The executive mind and double-loop learning. Organ Dyn. 1982;11(2):5–22.
Avelino F, Wittmayer JM. Shifting Power Relations in Sustainability Transitions: A Multi-Actor Perspective. J Environ Planning Policy Manage. 2016;18(5):628–49.
Barkema HG, Oleg S. Does top management team diversity promote or hamper foreign expansion? Strateg Manag J. 2007;28(7):663–80.
Bell ST, Villado AJ, Lukasik MA, Belau L, Briggs AL. Getting specific about demographic diversity variable and team performance relationships. J Manag. 2011;37(3):709–43.
Bendor J. Incrementalism: Dead yet Flourishing. Public Adm Rev. 2015;75(2):194–205.
Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C. Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
Boussalis C, Coan T, Holman G. Climate change communication from Cities in the USA. Clim Change. 2018;149(2):173–87.
Broto VC, Trencher G, Iwaszuk E, Westman L. Transformative capacity and local action for urban sustainability. Ambio. 2019;48(5):449–62.
Bryson JM, Crosby BC, Stone MM. The design and implementation of Cross-Sector collaborations. Public Adm Rev. 2006;66:44–55.
Bulkeley H. Urban sustainability: learning from best practice? Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 2006;38(6):1029–44.
Callens C. User involvement as a catalyst for collaborative public service innovation. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2023;33(2):29–341.
Cardullo P, Kitchin R. Smart Urbanism and Smart Citizenship: The Neoliberal Logic of ‘Citizen-Focused’ Smart Cities in Europe. Environment and Planning c: Politics and Space. 2019;37:813–30.
Cho YJ, Poister TH. Human resource management practices and trust in public organizations. Public Manag Rev. 2013;15(6):816–38.
Coaffee J, Healey P. ‘My Voice: My Place’: tracking transformations in Urban Governance. Urban Studies. 2003;40(10):1979–99.
Costigan RD, et al. The Effect of Employee trust of the supervisor on enterprising behavior: a cross-cultural comparison. J Bus Psychol. 2006;21(2):273–91.
Crosby BC, Bryson JM. Why leadership of public leadership research matters: and what to do about It. Public Manag Rev. 2018;20(9):1265–86.
Denters B, Klok P-J. Rebuilding roombeek: patterns of citizen participation in Urban governance. Urban Affairs Rev. 2010;45(5):583–607.
Dzigbede KD, Gehl SB, Willoughby K. Disaster Resiliency of U.S. local governments: insights to strengthen local response and recovery from the COVID-19 Pandemic. Public Adm Rev. 2020;80(4):634–43.
Einstein KL, Glick DM, Palmer M. Can Mayors lead on climate change? evidence from six years of surveys. Forum-A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics. 2020;18(1):71–86.
Eisenack K, Roggero M. Many roads to Paris: Explaining urban climate action in 885 European cities. Glob Environ Chang. 2022;72: 102439.
Elmqvist T, et al. Sustainability and Resilience for Transformation in the Urban Century. Nat Sustain. 2019;2(4):267–73.
Emerson K, et al. An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. J Public Admin Res Theory. 2012;22(1):1–29.
Fawcett P, Daugbjerg C. Explaining governance outcomes: Epistemology, network governance and policy network analysis. Polit Stud Rev. 2012;10(2):195–207.
Fedele G, Donatti CI, Harvey CA, Hannah L, Hole DG. Transformative Adaptation to Climate Change for Sustainable Social-ecological Systems. Environ Sci Policy. 2019;101:116–25.
Feindt PH. Policy-learning and environmental policy integration in the Common Agricultural Policy, 1973–2003. Public Admin. 2010;88(2):296–314.
Folke C, et al. ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2005;30(1):441–73.
Fung A. Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Adm Rev. 2006;66:66–75.
Harrison K. A Tale of Two Taxes: The Fate of Environmental Tax Reform in Canada. Rev Policy Res. 2012;29(3):383–407.
Hartley K, Kuecker G, Woo JJ. Practicing public policy in an age of disruption. Policy Des Pract. 2019;2(2):163–81.
Harvey D. Rebel cities: from the right to the city to the urban revolution. London: Verso; 2012.
Hays RA. The President, Congress, and the formation of housing policy: A reexamination of redistributive policy-making. Policy Stud J. 1990;18(4):847.
Head BW, Alford J. Wicked problems: implications for public policy and management. Admin Soc. 2015;47(6):711–39.
Hobbie SE, Grimm NB. Nature-based Approaches to Managing Climate Change Impacts in Cities. Philos Transact Royal Soc B-Biol Sci. 2020;375(1794):20190124.
Hölscher K, Frantzeskaki N. Perspectives on Urban Transformation Research: Transformations in, of, and by Cities. Urban Transformations. 2021;3(1):2.
Homsy G. “Unlikely pioneers: creative climate change policymaking in smaller US Cities.” J Environ Stud Sci. 2018;8(2):121–31.
Hon LC, Brunner B. Diversity issues and public relations. J Public Relat Res. 2000;12(4):309–40.
Howlett M, Ramesh M. Achilles’ heels of governance: critical capacity deficits and their role in governance failures. Regul Gov. 2016;10(4):301–13.
Hughes S. The politics of urban climate change policy. Urban Affairs Rev. 2017;53(2):362–80.
Hunt A, Watkiss P. Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation in Cities. Clim Change. 2011;104(1):13–49.
Irvin RA, Stansbury J. Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort? Public Adm Rev. 2004;64(1):55–65.
Jimenez BS. Municipal government form and budget outcomes: Political responsiveness, bureaucratic insulation, and the budgetary solvency of cities. J Public Admin Res Theory. 2020;30(1):161–77.
Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. London: Penguin Books; 2012.
Keivani R. A Review of the Main Challenges to Urban Sustainability. Int J Urban Sustain Dev. 2010;1(1–2):5–16.
Knemeyer AM, Zinn W, Eroglu C. Proactive planning for catastrophic events in supply chains. J Oper Manag. 2009;27(2):141–53.
Krause RM, Hawkins CV. Implementing city sustainability: overcoming administrative silos to achieve functional collective action. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 2021.
Laborgne Pia, et al. “Urban Living Labs: How to Enable Inclusive Transdisciplinary Research?” Urban Transform. 2021;3(1):11.
Lasker RD. Broadening participation in community problem solving: a multidisciplinary model to support collaborative practice and research. J Urban Health. 2003;80(1):14–60.
Lasswell HD. Politics: who gets what, when, how. New York: McGraw; 1936.
Lau DC, Murnighan JK. Demographic diversity and faultlines: the compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Acad Manage Rev. 1998;23(2):325–40.
Lefebvre H. The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell; 1991.
Leichenko R. Climate Change and Urban Resilience. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2011;3(3):164–8.
Lindblom Charles E. “The Science of ‘Muddling Through.” Public Admin Rev. 1959;19(2):79.
Lipton M. "Family, fungibility and formality: Rural advantages of informal non-farm enterprise versus the urban-formal state." In Human Resources, Employment and Development Volume 5: Developing Countries, pp. 189–242. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 1984.
Lomnitz LA, Sheinbaum D. Trust, social networks and the informal economy. Rev Sociol. 2004;10(1):5–26.
Low B, Ostrom E, Simon C, Wilson J. Redundancy and diversity: do they influence optimal management. In: Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C, editors. Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2003. p. 83–114.
Lowi TJ. Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice. Public Adm Rev. 1972;32(4):298.
Loyd DL, Wang CS, Phillips KW, Lount RB. Social category diversity promotes premeeting elaboration. Organ Sci. 2013;24(3):757–72.
Lubell M. Governing institutional complexity: The ecology of games framework. Policy Stud J. 2013;41(3):537–59.
Lukes, S., 2005. Power: a radical view. Second. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
March JG, Olsen JP. The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. Am Polit Sci Rev. 1983;78(3):734–49.
Marshall N, Park S, Howden W, Adger, Brown K. Transformational Capacity and the Influence of Place and Identity. Environmental Research Letters. 2012;7(3):1–9.
Meerow S, Newell JP, Stults M. Defining urban resilience: a review. Landsc Urban Plan. 2016;147:38–49.
Merrey DJ, Cook S. "Fostering Institutional Creativity at Multiple Levels: Towards Facilitated Institutional Bricolage." Water Alternatives (2012);5:1 .
Millar C, Lockett M, Ladd T. Disruption: Technology, Innovation and Society. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2018;129:254–60.
Mintrom M, Luetjens J. Policy entrepreneurs and problem framing: The case of climate change. Environ Planning C: Politics and Space. 2017;35(8):1362–77.
Mintrom M, Vergari S. Policy networks and innovation diffusion: The case of state education reforms. J Polit. 1998;60(1):126–48.
Mintrom M. Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. Am J Pol Sci. 1997;41(3):738–70.
Morrow JL Jr, Hansen MH, Pearson AW. The cognitive and affective antecedents of general trust within cooperative organizations. J Manage Issues. 2004;16(1):48–64.
Moser SC, Ekstrom JA. A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107(51):22026–31.
Newig J, Günther D, Pahl-Wostl C. Synapses in the network: learning in governance networks in the context of environmental management. Ecol Soc. 2010;15:4.
Jens Newig, et al. The Environmental Performance of Participatory and Collaborative Governance: A Framework of Causal Mechanisms: Environmental Performance of Participation. Policy Stud J. 2018;46(2):269–97.
Nguyen Long L, Krause RM. Managing policy-making in the local climate governance landscape: the role of network administrative organizations and member cities. Public Adm. 2021;99:23–39.
O’Brien K. Global Environmental Change II: From Adaptation to Deliberate Transformation. Prog Hum Geogr. 2012;36(5):667–76.
Ostrom E. Why do we need to protect institutional diversity? Eur Polit Sci. 2012;11(1):128–47.
Page SE. The Diversity Bonus: How Great Teams Pay off in the Knowledge Economy. First paperback printing: Princeton University Press; 2019.
Pelled LH, Eisenhardt K, Xin KR. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Adm Sci Q. 1999;44(1):1–28.
Perrow C. Normal accidents: living with high risk technologies - updated edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2000.
Phillips KW, Medin D, Lee CD, Bang M, Bishop S, Lee DN. How diversity works. Sci Am. 2014;311(4):42–7.
Phillips CA, Caldas A, Cleetus R, Dahl KA, Declet-Barreto J, Licker LD, Pablo Merner J, Ortiz-Partida AL, Phelan E, Spanger-Siegfried S, Talati CH, Trisos CJ, Carlson C. Compound Climate Risks in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Nat Clim Chang. 2020;10(7):586–8.
Provan KG, Milward HB. Do Networks Really Work? A Framework for Evaluating Public-Sector Organizational Networks. Public Adm Rev. 2001;61(4):414–23.
Rampersad G, Quester P, Troshani I. Examining network factors: commitment, trust, coordination and harmony. J Business Industrial Market. 2010;25(7):487–500.
Rosenzweig C, Solecki W. Action pathways for transforming cities. Nat Clim Change. 2018;8(9):756–9.
Rosenzweig C, Solecki W. “Hurricane Sandy and Adaptation Pathways in New York.” Global Environ Change. 2014;28(C):395–408.
Russ-Eft D. That old fungible feeling: Defining human resource development. Adv Dev Hum Resour. 2000;2(3):49–53.
Sancino A, Budd L, Pagani M. Place leadership, policy-making and politics. Handbook on City and Regional Leadership, by Markku Sotarauta and Andrew Beer. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2021. p. 57–70.
Sarewitz D, Roger P, Keykhah M. Vulnerability and Risk: Some Thoughts from a Political and Policy Perspective. Risk Anal. 2003;23(4):805–10.
Schmidt VA, Radaelli CM. Policy Change and Discourse in Europe. West Eur Polit. 2004;27(2):183–210.
Simon HA. Administrative behavior: a study of decision-making processes in administrative organization. New York: Macmillan; 1947.
Slack E. The politics of the property tax. In: McCluskey WJ, Cornia GC, Walters LC, editors. A primer on property tax: administration and policy. Oxford: Blackwell; 2012. p. 69–88.
Smeds E, Acuto M. Networking cities after Paris: weighing the ambition of urban climate change experimentation. Global Pol. 2018;9(4):549–59.
Sørensen E, Torfing J. Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernanCE. Public Administration. 2009;81(2):234–58.
Tausanovitch C, Warshaw C. Representation in municipal government. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2014;108(3):605–41.
Teodoro MP. Bureaucratic job mobility and the diffusion of innovations. Am J Polit Sci. 2009;53(1):175–89.
Torfing Jacob, et al. Transforming the Public Sector Into an Arena for Co-Creation: Barriers, Drivers, Benefits, and Ways Forward. Admin Soc. 2019;51(5):795–825.
Torrens Jonas, von Wirth Timo. Experimentation or Projectification of Urban Change? A Critical Appraisal and Three Steps Forward. Urban Transformations. 2021;3(1):8.
Tversky A, Kahneman D. Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model. Q J Econ. 1991;106(4):1039–61.
Wagenaar H. Governance, complexity, and democratic participation: how citizens and public officials harness the complexities of neighborhood decline. Am Rev Public Admin. 2007;37(1):17–50.
Walker B, Gunderson L, Kinzig A, Folke C, Carpenter S, Schultz L. A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc. 2006;11(1):1.
Wallace WA, Mendonca D, Lee EE, Mitchell JE, Chow J. Managing disruptions to critical interdependent infrastructures in the context of the 2001 World Trade Center attack. Beyond September 11th: an account of post-disaster research. 2003;165–98.
Watts M. Cities spearhead climate action. Nat Clim Chang. 2017;7(8):537–8.
Weible CM. A collective interest model approach to explain the benefit–cost expectations of participating in a collaborative institution. Environ Behav. 2008a;40(1):24–45.
Weible CM. Expert-based information and policy subsystems: a review and synthesis. Policy Stud J. 2008b;36(4):615–35.
Weigand RA. Organizational diversity, profits and returns in U.S. Firms. Probl Perspect Manag. 2007;5(3):69–83.
Wolfram M. Conceptualizing Urban transformative capacity: a framework for research and policy. Cities. 2016;51:121–30.
Yeganeh AJ, Mccoy AP, Schenk T. Determinants of climate change policy adoption. Urban Clim. 2020;31(100547):1–23.
Yi H, Chen W. Portable innovation, policy wormholes, and innovation diffusion. Public Adm Rev. 2019;79(5):737–48.
Zhou X. Organizational decision making as rule following. In: Shapira Z, editor. Organizational decision making: Cambridge University Press; 1997. p. 257.