The lived experiences of pre-service science teachers designing and teaching socioscientific issues-based units

Aikenhead, G. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. Teachers College Press.

Appleton, K., & Kindt, I. (1999). Why teach primary science? Influences on beginning teachers’ practices. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290769.

Arends, D., & Kilcher, A. (2010). Teaching for student learning: Becoming an accomplished teacher. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203866771.

Armstrong, M. (2010). Armstrong's essential human resource management practice: A guide to people management. Kogan Page Publishers.

Asghar, A. (2013). Canadian and Pakistani Muslim teachers’ perceptions of evolutionary science and evolution education. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1936-6434-6-10.

Barrett, S. E., & Pedretti, E. (2006). Contrasting orientations: STSE for social reconstruction or social reproduction? School Science and Mathematics, 5, 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2006.tb18082.x.

Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology-based issues. Science Education, 87(3), 352–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10063.

Bencze, L., & Hodson, D. (1999). Changing practice by changing practice: Toward more authentic science and science curriculum development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(5), 521–539 https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(199905)36:5<521::aid-tea2>3.0.co;2-6.

Bingle, W. H., & Gaskell, P. J. (1994). Scientific literacy for decision-making and the social construction of scientific knowledge. Science Education, 78(2), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730780206.

Bunten, R., & Dawson, V. (2014). Teaching climate change science in senior secondary school: Issues, barriers and opportunities. Teaching Science, 60(1), 10.

Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Heinemann.

Carter, B. E., & Wiles, J. R. (2014). Scientific consensus and social controversy: Exploring relationships between students’ conceptions of the nature of science, biological evolution, and global climate change. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 7(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-014-0006-3.

Cebesoy, Ü. B., & Sahin, M. D. (2013). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının sosyobilimsel konulara yönelik tutumlarının çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. M. Ü. Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 37, 100–117. https://doi.org/10.33418/ataunikkefd.558150.

Christensen, C., & Fensham, F. J. (2012). Risk, uncertainty, and complexity in science education. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education, (pp. 751–769). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_50.

Clarkeburn, H., Downie, J. R., & Matthew, B. (2002). Impact of an ethics programme in a life sciences curriculum. Teaching in Higher Education, 7(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510120100391.

Crawford, B. A., Zembal-Saul, C., Munford, D., & Friedrichsen, P. (2005). Confronting prospective teachers’ ideas of evolution and scientific inquiry using technology and inquiry-based tasks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 613–637. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20070.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design choosing among five approaches, (3rd ed., ). SAGE Publications.

DeBoer, G. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. Teachers College Press.

DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 582–601 https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::aid-tea5>3.0.co;2-l.

Denscombe, M. (2010). The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects. McGraw-Hill Education.

Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 84, 287–312 https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-237x(200005)84:3<287::aid-sce1>3.0.co;2-a.

Eastwood, J. L., Sadler, T. D., Zeidler, D. L., Lewis, A., Amiri, L., & Applebaum, S. (2012). Contextualizing nature of science instruction in Socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(15), 2289–2315. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.667582.

Ellis, P. (2016). Understanding research for nursing students, (3rd ed., ). Sage Publications.

Gallagher, S. (2012). Phenomenology. Palgrave Macmillan.

Gewertz, C. (2008). Consensus on learning time builds. Education Week, 28(5), 12.

Hestness, E., McGinnis, J. R., Riedinger, K., & Marbach-Ad, G. (2011). A study of teacher candidates’ experiences investigating global climate change within an elementary science methods course. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(4), 351–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9234-3.

Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305021.

House, J. S., & Williams, D. R. (2003). Understanding and reducing socioeconomic and racial/ethnic disparities in health. In R. Hofrichter (Ed.), Health and social justice: Politics, ideology, and inequity in the distribution of disease. Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyh294.

Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implication of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2701_6.

Kara, Y. (2012). Pre-service biology teachers’ perceptions on the instruction of socioscientific issues in the curriculum. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(1), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2011.633999.

Khalid, T. (2003). Pre-service secondary school teachers’ perceptions of three environmental phenomena. Environmental Education Research, 9(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620303466.

Khishfe, R., & Lederman, N. (2006). Teaching nature of science within a controversial topic: Integrated versus non-integrated. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20137.

Kolstø, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85(3), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1011.

Kyle Jr., W. C. (1996). Editorial: The importance of investing in human resources. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 1–4.

Lambert, J. L., & Bleicher, R. E. (2013). Climate change in the preservice teacher’s mind. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(6), 999–1022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9344-1.

Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2014). Research on teaching and learning of nature of science. In N. G. Lederman, & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, (vol. 2, pp. 600–620). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203097267.ch30.

Lee, H., Chang, H., Choi, K., Kim, S. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2012). Developing character and values for global citizens: Analysis of pre-service science teachers’ moral reasoning on socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 925–953. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.625505.

Lee, H., & Witz, K. G. (2009). Science teachers’ inspiration for teaching socio-scientific issues: Disconnection with reform efforts. International Journal of Science Education, 31(7), 931–960. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690801898903.

Levinson, R. (2006). Towards a theoretical framework for teaching controversial socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 28(10), 1201–1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600560753.

Mansour, N. (2008). The experiences and personal religious beliefs of Egyptian science teachers as a framework for understanding the shaping and reshaping of their beliefs and practices about science-technology-society (STS). International Journal of Science Education, 30(12), 1605–1634. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701463303.

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE publications.

National Research Council (2012). A framework for k-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165.

Olson, J., Tippett, C., Milford, T., Ohana, C., & Clough, M. (2015). Science teacher preparation in a north American context. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9417-9.

Patronis, T., Potari, D., & Spiliotopoulou, V. (1999). Students’ argumentation in decision-making on a socio-scientific issue: Implications for teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 745–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290408.

Reis, P., & Galvao, C. (2009). Teaching controversial socio-scientific issues in biology and geology classes: A case study. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 13, 165–188.

Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education. In N. G. Lederman, & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, (vol. II, pp. 545–558). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203097267.ch27.

Sadler, T., Amirshokoohi, A., Kazempour, M., & Allspaw, K. M. (2006). Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms: Teacher perspectives and strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 353–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20142.

Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009.

Sadler, T. D. (2009). Socioscientific issues in science education: Labels, reasoning, and transfer. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4(3), 697–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9133-x.

Sadler, T. D. (2011). Situating socio-scientific issues in classrooms as a means of achieving goals of science education. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research, (pp. 1–9). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4_1.

Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37, 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9.

Schalk, K. (2009, Spring). A case-study of a socio-scientific issues curricular and pedagogical intervention in an undergraduate microbiology course: A focus on informal reasoning. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland].

Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers College Press.

Shea, N. A., Mouza, C., & Drewes, A. (2016). Climate change professional development: Design, implementation, and initial outcomes on teacher learning, practice, and student beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(3), 235–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9456-5.

Simmons, M. L., & Zeidler, D. (2003). Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific issue. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education, (pp. 81–94). Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4996-x_5.

Starks, H., & Brown Trinidad, S. (2007). Choose your method: A comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1372–1380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307307031.

Sundler, A. J., Lindberg, E., Nilsson, C., & Palmér, L. (2019). Qualitative thematic analysis based on descriptive phenomenology. Nursing Open, 6(3), 733–739. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.275.

Tal, T., & Abramovitch, A. (2012). Activity and action: Bridging environmental sciences and environmental education. Research in Science Education, 43, 1665–1687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9327-9.

Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. State University of New York Press. https://doi.org/10.29173/pandp15124.

Van Manen, M. (1997). From meaning to method. Qualitative Health Research, 7(3), 345–369.

Van Manen, M. (2016). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315422657.

Viadero, D. (2008). Research yields clues on the effects of extra time for learning. Education Week, 28(5), 16–18.

Walker, K. A., & Zeidler, D. L. (2007). Promoting discourse about socioscientific issues through scaffolded inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1387–1410. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601068095.

Wise, S. B. (2010). Climate change in the classroom: Patterns, motivations, and barriers to instruction among Colorado science teachers. Journal of Geoscience Education, 58(5), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.5408/1.3559695.

Wu, Y. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2007). High school students’ informal reasoning on a socioscientific issue: Qualitative and quantitative analyses. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1163–1187. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601083375.

Yüksel, P., & Yıldırım, S. (2015). Theoretical frameworks, methods, and procedures for conducting phenomenological studies in educational settings. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 6(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.59813.

Zeidler, D. L. (2003). The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education. Kluwer Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4996-x.

Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis: Theory, research and practice. In N. G. Lederman, & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, (vol. II, pp. 697–726). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203097267.ch34.

Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03173684.

Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048.

Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008.